Discovery Doctrine

Discovery Doctrine

The Discovery Doctrine is a concept of public international law expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most notably "Johnson v. M'Intosh" in 1823. The doctrine was Chief Justice John Marshall's explanation of the way in which colonial powers laid claim to newly discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. Under it, title to newly discovered lands lay with the government whose subjects discovered new territory. The doctrine has been primarily used to support decisions invalidating or ignoring aboriginal possession of land in favor of colonial or post-colonial governments.

John Marshall, who is most credited with describing the doctrine, did not voice wholehearted support of the doctrine even while using it to justify judicial decisions. He pointed to the doctrine as simple fact, looking at the possession-takings which had been supported by it as things which had occurred and had to be recognized. The supposedly inferior character of native cultures was a reason for the doctrine having been used, but whether or not that was justified was not relevant for Marshall.cite news | first = Jack | last = Utter | title = The Discovery Doctrine, the tribes and the truth | url = http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=2541 | work = Indian Country Today | publisher = Four Directions Media |date= 2000-06-07 | accessdate = 2007-01-10]

Colonial history

The origins of the doctrine can be traced to Pope Nicholas V's issuance of the papal bull Romanus Pontifex in 1452, essentially declaring war against all non-Christians. The bull allowed Portugal to claim and conquer lands in West Africa. Pope Alexander VI extended to Spain the right to conquer newly-found lands in 1493, after Christopher Columbus had already begun doing so. Arguments between Portugal and Spain led Alexander to clarify that only non-Christian lands could thus be taken, as well as drawing the Line of Demarcation to allocate potential discoveries between the two powers.cite journal | last = Newcomb | first = Steve | year = 1992 | month = Fall | title = Five Hundred Years of Injustice | journal = Shaman's Drum | pages = 18–20 | url = http://ili.nativeweb.org/sdrm_art.html | accessdate = 2007-01-10]

United States law

According to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. M'Intosh, this theory of Christian expansion and possession of newly discovered lands, despite native presence, was one by which all colonial powers operated. Chief Justice Marshall, writing the decision, held that the United Kingdom had taken title to the lands which constituted the United States when the British discovered them. Marshall pointed to the exploration charters given to John Cabot as proof that the British had operated under the doctrine. The tribes which occupied the land were, at the moment of discovery, no longer completely sovereign and had no property rights but rather merely held a right of occupancy. Further, only the discovering nation or its successor could take possession of the land from the natives by conquest or purchase. Natives could not sell the land to private citizens but only to the discovering government.

The doctrine was used in numerous other cases as well. With Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, it supported the concept that tribes were not independent states but "domestic dependent nations". The decisions in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe and Duro v. Reina used the doctrine to prohibit tribes from criminally prosecuting first non-Indians, then Indians who weren't a member of the prosecuting tribe.cite web | url = http://thorpe.ou.edu/guide/robertson.html | title = Native Americans and the Law: Native Americans Under Current United States Law | accessdate = 2007-01-10 | last = Robertson | first = Lindsay G. | year = 2001 | month = June | work = Native American Constitution and Law Digitization Project | publisher = The University of Oklahoma Law Center]

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Discovery doctrine — This article is about the discovery of land under public international law. For pre trial phase of a lawsuit, see Discovery (law) …   Wikipedia

  • Discovery (law) — This article is about pre trial phase of a lawsuit. For about the discovery of land under public international law, see Discovery Doctrine. Civil procedure in the United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Doctrines of civil procedure… …   Wikipedia

  • discovery — dis·cov·ery n pl er·ies 1: the act or process of discovering 2: something discovered applied for a patent for the discovery 3 a: the methods used by parties to a civil or criminal action to obtain information held by the other party that is… …   Law dictionary

  • Doctrine of Addai — • Syriac document which relates the conversion of Edessa Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Doctrine of Addai     Doctrine of Addai      …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Doctrine of signatures — The doctrine of signatures is a philosophy shared by herbalists from the time of Dioscurides and Galen. This doctrine states that herbs that resemble various parts of the body can be used to treat ailments of that part of the body. Examples… …   Wikipedia

  • Doctrine of worthier title — Property law Part of t …   Wikipedia

  • Doctrine of chances — Chance Chance (ch[.a]ns), n. [F. chance, OF. cheance, fr. LL. cadentia a allusion to the falling of the dice), fr. L. cadere to fall; akin to Skr. [,c]ad to fall, L. cedere to yield, E. cede. Cf. {Cadence}.] 1. A supposed material or psychical… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Work-product doctrine — In American civil procedure, the work product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation from discovery by opposing counsel. [cite encyclopedia |editor=Bryan G. Gardner |title=Work product rule |encyclopedia=Black s Law… …   Wikipedia

  • work product doctrine — n: a doctrine or rule that protects an attorney s work product from discovery – called also work product rule; ◇ This doctrine applies to work product of all kinds, but it may be waived for certain materials (as documents) if the party seeking… …   Law dictionary

  • Plain view doctrine — The plain view doctrine allows an officer to seize without a warrant, evidence and contraband found in plain view during a lawful observation.For the plain view doctrine to apply for discoveries, three criteria must be met: # the officer is where …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”