Argument from religious experience

Argument from religious experience

The Argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God, as against materialism.

Outline logical structure

Its logical structure is essentially as follows:
# There are compelling reasons for considering at least some religious experiences to point to and validate spiritual realities that exist in a way that transcends any material manifestations.
# According to Materialism, nothing exists in a way that transcends its material manifestations.
# According to Classical Theism in general, and Christianity in particular, God endows Humans with the ability to have spiritual experiences and to perceive, albeit imperfectly, such spiritual realities [There are innumerable references in both the Old testament, from Adam talking with God in Genesis onwards, and in the New Testament of which the Transfiguration and St Paul's comments in 1 Corinthians about spiritual gifts and "seeing through a glass darkly" (i.e. through a poor mirror, imperfectly) may stand as two examples] and these spiritual realities exist in a way that transcends any material manifestations.
# Therefore, to the extent that premise (1) is accepted, Theism is more plausible than Materialism.

Points 2, 3 and 4 are relatively un-controversial, and the argument is formally valid, so discussion focuses on the premise (1).

uggested reasons for accepting the premise

The principal arguments for the premise are:
# Very substantial numbers of "ordinary" people report having had such experiences, though this isn't to say that religious believers aren't ordinary [Polkinghorne "Belief in God in an Age of Science" p119 referencing "the surveys conducted by the distinguished biologist Alister Hardy"] [Swinburne references David Hay "Religious Experience Today" (1990) chapters 5, 6 and Appendix] . Such experiences are reported in almost all known cultures. Although such reported experiences may not all correspond to an objective reality, they are strong enough prima facie evidence that very compelling arguments to the contrary would be needed to cancel them out.
# These experiences often have very significant effects on people's lives, frequently inducing in them acts of extreme self-sacrifice well beyond what could be expected from evolutionary arguments. It is hard to imagine an evolutionary benefit in having these experiences if they are all, or mostly, false.
# These experiences often seem very real to the people involved, and are quite often reported as being shared by a number of people [ For example the New Testament speaks of Jesus, after his resurrection, appearing to 10 or more people at once (see eg 1 Corinthians 15:6, Luke 24, Mt 28, Jn 16, Acts 1).] . Although mass delusions are not inconceivable, one needs compelling reasons for invoking this as an explanation.

Swinburne suggests that, as two basic principles of rationality, we ought to believe that things are as they seem unless and until we have evidence that they are mistaken (principle of credulity), and that those who do not have an experience of a certain type ought to believe others who say that they do in the absence of evidence of deceit or delusion (principle of testimony) and thus, although if you have a "strong" reason to disbelieve in the existence of God you will discount these experiences, in other cases such evidence should count towards the existence of God. [ Swinburne, "Is there a God?" p 133–136]

uggested reasons for disputing the premise

# There is little doubt that some reports of religious experience have naturalistic and/or psychological explanations and are thus mistaken. If some reports are mistaken, perhaps all such reports may be.
# These might be mis-firings of evolutionary mechanisms selected for very different reasons [This is broadly Dawkins' line in The God Delusion] .
# It is conceivable that some claimed religious experiences are lies, possibly done for attention or acceptance.
# Different people have had, or believed to have had, religious experiences pointing to the existence of different religions. Not all of these can be correct. (For more information see the Argument from Inconsistent Revelations).
# Some have argued that the experiences are hallucinations which stem from "wanting" to believe in God (In a way relating to Pascal's Wager) that the person converts into a vivid hallucination that they try to convince themselves was "real", but they know aren't in the back of their mind(s). Some have compared them to insane people who have the same type of hallucination, but they obviously aren't taken as seriously.

Notes & References


Relevant authors and sources include:

* John Polkinghorne See eg his "The faith of a scientist" and "Belief in an Age of Science"
* Tom Wright who regards religious experience as one of the four main pointers to belief in God — see esp. his "Simply Christian" SPCK 2006, Ch 2 "The hidden spring"
* Richard Dawkins who in The God Delusion dismisses the Argument from religious experience, without formally stating it.
* Richard Swinburne esp "The Existence of God" OUP 2nd Edition 2004 ISBN 0199271682 and "Is there a God?" OUP 1996 ISBN 0198235453
* Ian Barbour "Religion and Science" SCM 1998 ISBN 0 334 02721 7
* William James wrote the classic account of "Varieties of Religious Experience"
* Caroline Franks Davis discusses "The Evidential Force of Religious Experience" in her book of that name, OUP 2004 ISBN 0198250010.

ee also

Religious experience

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • argument from religious experience —    see experience, religious …   Christian Philosophy

  • Religious experience — For the Wayne Proudfoot book, see Religious Experience (book). Religious experience (sometimes known as a spiritual experience, sacred experience, or mystical experience) is a subjective experience in which an individual reports contact with a… …   Wikipedia

  • Argument from nonbelief — Part of a series on Atheism …   Wikipedia

  • religious experience — Introduction       specific experiences such as wonder at the infinity of the cosmos, the sense of awe and mystery in the presence of the holy, feelings of dependence on a divine power or an unseen order, the sense of guilt and anxiety… …   Universalium

  • Argument from morality — The argument from morality is one of many arguments for the existence of God. It comes in different forms, all aiming to support the claim that God exists with observations about morality. Its counterpoint is generally the Problem of evil.… …   Wikipedia

  • Argument from love — The Argument from love is an argument for the existence of God, as against materialism and reductionist forms of physicalism.Outline of argumentThe deep relationship of theism in general, and Christianity in particular, and love goes back to the… …   Wikipedia

  • experience, religious —    An experience is religious if the individual undergoing it takes it to involve an encounter with a transcendent divine reality. While such experience is generally believed to contrast with mundane non divine experience, Schleiermacher rejected …   Christian Philosophy

  • Religious belief — refers to a mental state in which trust (faith) is placed in a creed related to the supernatural, sacred, or divine. Such a state may relate to: 1) the existence, characteristics and worship of a deity or deities, 2) divine intervention in the… …   Wikipedia

  • Religious disaffiliation — (see also apostasy) means leaving a faith, or a religious group or community. It is in many respects the reverse of religious conversion. Several other terms are used for this process, though each of these terms may have slightly different… …   Wikipedia

  • Religious violence — The Crusades were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between Christian Europe and Muslims. Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade. Religious violence is a term that covers all phenomena where religion, in any of its forms …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”