- Photo-Secession
The Photo-Secession was a movement in photography away from photography as an objective science. The group of photographers, led by
Alfred Stieglitz andF. Holland Day in the early 1900s, espoused the principles ofPictorialism , which held that what was significant about a photograph was not what was in front of the camera, but the manipulation of the image by the artist/photographer to achieve his or her subjective vision. The movement helped to raise standards and awareness of art photography. The group is the American counter part to the Linked Ring, an invitation only British group which seceded from theRoyal Photographic Society .The group was formed in 1902 after Stieglitz was asked by the
National Arts Club to put together an exhibition of the best in contemporary American photography. While organizing the show Stieglitz had a disagreement with some of the more conservative members of the Club about which photographers should be included. To strengthen his position, Stieglitz rapidly formed an invitation-only group, which he called the Photo-Secession, to give the impression that his views were backed by many other prominent photographers. Although he later claimed that he had “enlisted the aid of the then newly organized and limited ‘Photo-Secession’, and it was determined to hold the forthcoming exhibition under the auspices of that group. In fact there was no such group until he formed it on February 17, 1902, just two weeks before the show at the National Arts Club was scheduled to start.cite book|author=William Innes Homer|title=Stieglitz and the Photo-Secession 1902|publisher=NY:Viking Studio|date=2002|pages=22,24-25]The photographers who were included in the first exhibition were C. Yarnell Abbott, Prescott Adamson, Arthur E. Becher, Charles I. Berg, Alice Bougton, John G. Bullock, Rose Clark and Ellizabth Flint Wade, F. Colburn Clarke,
F. Holland Day , Mary M. Devens, William B. Dyer, Thomas M. Edmiston, Frank Eugene, Dallett Fuguet, Tom Harris,Gertrude Käsebier , Joseph T. Keily, Mary Morgan Keipp, Oscar Maurer, William B. Post, Robert S. Redfield, W. W. Renwick, Eva Watson-Schütze, T. O’Conor Sloane, Jr., Ema Spencer,Edward Steichen ,Alfred Stieglitz , Edmund Stirling, Henry Troth, Mathilde Weil and Clarence H. White.Stieglitz’s sole role in forming and tightly controlling the Photo-Secession was made clear by two exchanges that took place at the opening of the National Arts Club show. In the first, Stieglitz implied that membership in the group was relatively open:
:Käsebier: “What’s this Photo-Secession? Am I a photo-secessionist?”:Stieglitz: “Do you feel that you are?”:Käsebier: “I do”:Stieglitz: “Well, that’s all there is to it.”
However, when Charles Berg asked Stieglitz if he, too, was a Photo-Secessionist, Stieglitz brusquely informed him he was not. Stieglitz gave this response even though he was the one responsible for including three of Berg’s photos in the show.
The “membership” of the Photo-Secession varied according to Stieglitz’s interests and temperament, centered around a core group of Stieglitz, Steichen, White, Käsbier, Eugene, Day, and, later,
Alvin Langdon Coburn .In founding the Photo-Secession, Stieglitz asserted that it was a “rebellion against the insincere attitude of the unbeliever, of the Philistine, and largely exhibition authorities.” [cite book|author=Katherine Hoffman|title=Stieglitz : A Beginning Light|publisher=New Haven: Yale University Press Studio|date=2004|pages=202] While this was in part true, his actions demonstrated that the creation of the Photo-Secession was also about advancing his own position in the world of photography and art.
Proponents of Pictorialism, which was the underlying value of the Photo-Secession, argued that photography needed to emulate the
painting andetching of the time. Pictorialists believed that just as what made a painting distinctive was the artist’s manipulation of the materials to achieve an effect, so too should the photographer alter or manipulate the photographic image. Among the methods used weresoft focus ; special filters and lens coatings; burning, dodging and/or cropping in thedarkroom to edit the content of the image; and alternative printing processes such assepia toning ,carbon print ing, platinum printing orgum bichromate processing.Content of the images often referred to previous work done by other artists, especially Greek and Roman art. Images often contained stylistic consistency such as dramatic lighting, perspective, geometric, monochrome/black and white, and high contrast.
In 1905 Stieglitz established the
Little Galleries of the Photo-Secession , a small but highly influential gallery where he continued to exhibit some of the more well-known members of the movement. The group continued to exhibit under the Photo-Secession name until about 1910, when several photographers finally grew tired of Stieglitz’s autocratic ways and finally left the group.In 1916 Käsebier, White, Coburn and others formed an organization call the [http://www.ppa-photoclub.org/about.html Pictorial Photographers of America] (PPA) to continue promotion of the pictorial style. A year later Stieglitz formally dissolved the Photo-Secession, although by that time it existed in name only.
tieglitz's Statement
The following notice appeared in "
Camera Work ", no. 3, Supplement, July 1903The Photo-Secession
:"So many are the enquiries as to the nature and aims of the Photo- Secession and requirements of eligibility to membership therein, that we deem it expedient to give a brief résumé of the character of this body of photographers.
:The object of the Photo-Secession is: to advance photography as applied to pictorial expression; to draw together those Americans practicing or otherwise interested in the art, and to hold from time to time, at varying places, exhibitions not necessarily limited to the productions of the Photo-Secession or to American work.
:It consists of a Council (all of whom are Fellows); Fellows chosen by the Council for meritorious photographic work or labors in behalf of pictorial photography, and Associates eligible by reason of interest in, and sympathy with, the aims of the Secession.
:In order to give Fellowship the value of an honor, the photographic work of a possible candidate must be individual and distinctive, and it goes without saying that the applicant must be in thorough sympathy with our aims and principles.
:To Associateship are attached no requirements except sincere sympathy with the aims and motives of the Secession. Yet, it must not be supposed that these qualifications will be assumed as a matter of course, as it has been found necessary to deny the application of many whose lukewarm interest in the cause with which we are so thoroughly identified gave no promise of aiding the Secession. It may be of general interest to know that quite a few, perhaps entitled by their photographic work to Fellowship, have applied in vain. Their rejection being based solely upon their avowed or notoriously active opposition or equally harmful apathy. Many whose sincerity could not be questioned were refused Fellowship because the work submitted was not equal to the required standard. Those desiring further information must address the Director of the Photo-Secession, Mr. Alfred Stieglitz, 1111 Madison Avenue, New York."
List of Members
List of Members of the Photo-Secession, found in "
Camera Work ", no. 3, Supplement, July 1903Fellows (Founders and Council)
*John G. Bullock - Philadelphia
*William. B Dyer. - Chicago
*Dallett Fuguet - New York
*Gertrude Käsebier - New York
*Joseph T. Keiley - New York
*Robert S. Redfield - Philadelphia
*Eva Watson-Schütze - Chicago
*Eduard J. Steichen - New York
*Alfred Stieglitz - New York
*Edmund Stirling - Philadelphia
*John F. Strauss - New York
*Clarence H. White - Newark, OhioThe following were also listed Fellows, but not members of the Council
*Alvin Langdon Coburn - Boston
*Mary Devens - Boston
*William B. Post - Fryeburg, Me.
*S. L. Willard - ChicagoAssociates
*Prescott Adamson - Philadelphia
*W. P. Agnew - New York
*A. C. Bates - Cleveland, Ohio
*Edward LaVelle Bourke - Chicago
*Annie W. Brigman - Oakland, Cal.
*Norman W. Carkhuff - Washington
*W. E. Carlin - New York
*J. Mitchell Elliot - Philadelphia
*Dr. Milton Franklin - New York
*George A. Heisey – Newark, Oh.
*Sam S. Holzman - New York
*Marshall P. Kernochan - New York
*Sarah H. Ladd - Portland, Ore.
*Chester Abbott Lawrence - New York
*Fred K. Lawrence - Chicago
*Oscar Maurer - San Francisco
*William J. Mullins - Franklin, Pa.
*Olive M. Potts - Philadelphia
*Harry B. Reid - New York
*Harry C. Rubincam - Denver
*T. O’Conor Sloane - Orange, N. J.
*Walter P. Stokes - Philadelphia
*Mrs. George A. Stanbery - Zanesville, Ohio
*Katherine Stanbery - Zanesville, Ohio
*George B. Vaux - Philadelphia
*Mary Vaux - Philadelphia
*Lily E. White - Portland, Ore.
*Myra Wiggins - Salem, Ore.
*Arthur W. Wilde - PhiladelphiaLater the following photographers were listed as Members of the Photo-Secession. [cite book|author=Robert Doty|title=Photo Secession - Photography as a Fine Art|Publisher=Rochest, NY: George Eastman House|year=1960|page=104] Unlike Fellows and Associates, no definition was given of what constituted a member. All categories and assignments of membership were made by Stieglitz himself.
*Charlotte C. Aleright - Buffalo, N. Y.
*J. W. Alexander - New York
*John Aspinwall - Newburgh, N.Y.
*Alice Boughton - New York
*A. K. Boursault - New York
*John M. Bowles - New York
*F. E. Brown - Grand Rapids, Mich.
*Francis Bruguière - San Francisco
*Elizabeth Buehrmann - Chicago
*Charles H. Caffin - New York
*S. R. Carter -Toronto, Canada
*Mrs. F. F. Coburn - New York
*C. C. Crowther - Kobe, Japan
*S. D. Dixon - New York
*J. M. Drivet - New York
*Charles B. Duryea - New York
*Hiram Duryea - New York
*W. G. Eckstein - New York
*Frank Eugene - New York
*Herbert G. French - Cincinnati
*George Haviland - New York
*Paul B. Haviland - New York
*L. A. Heinsheimer - New York
*H. A. Hess - Springfield, Ill.
*J. P. Hodgins - Toronto, Canada
*L. J. R. Holst - New York
*S. S. Hornor - Concordville, Pa.
*F. W. Hunter - New York
*W. F. James - Chicago
*Frances B. Johnston - Washington
*Walter G. Jones - New York
*Edward W. Keck - Rochester, N. Y.
*Spencer, Jr. Kellogg - Buffalo, N. Y.
*J. B. Kerfoot - New York
*R. Kimbell - New York
*Louis A. Lamb - Chicago
*H. W. Lance - New York
*J. N. Laurvik - New York
*S. Brainerd Lawrence - New York
*Adelaide C. Leeson - Douglas, Alaska
*A. A. Lewis - New York
*Helen. Lohman - New York
*C. H. Macdowell - Chicago
*F. F. Marks - Camden, N. J.
*L. M. McCormick - Asheville, N. C.
*Arthur. Mooney - New York
*Charles Peabody - Cambridge, Mass.
*Jeanette B. Peabody - Cambridge, Mass.
*F. H. Pratt - Worcester, Mass.
*Landon Rives - Cobham, Va.
*C. W. Roepper - Philadelphia
*L. B. Schram - New York
*Sarah C. Sears -Boston
*George Seeley - Stockbridge, Mass.
*H. S. Smith - Boston
*L. F. Stephany - Pittsburgh
*Albert E. Sterner - New York
*Karl Strauss - New York
*Elizabeth R. Tyson - Boston
*S. S. Webber - Trenton, N. J.
*W. E. Wilmerding - New YorkNotes
External Links
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.