- 2006 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts
Concurrence
width=25px
Concurrence/dissent
white-space: nowrap |Total =
13
-
colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 11
colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 0
colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 2
-
white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 2
colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Scalia, Thomas, Alito (9)
colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Stevens, Ginsburg (3)
valign=top | Federal Employers' Liability Act
width=20% valign=top | Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Alito
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Souter and Ginsburg filed concurring opinions.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Standing; Clean Air Act
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Thomas, Alito
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Roberts denied the application for a stay.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Thomas, Alito
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Thomas, Alito
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Roberts denied the applications for extension of time to petition for rehearing the Court's denial of "certiorari", and for suspension of the order denying "cert."
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Roberts concurred in the Court's dismissal of "certiorari", stating that he did not agree with all of the reasons given in the Court's "per curiam" opinion, but that he agreed with the disposition.-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Free speech; student rights
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Roberts wrote for a 5-4 majority in holding that a public school principal may, consistent with the First Amendment, restrict student speech at a school event when that speech is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Campaign finance reform
width=20% valign=top | Alito; Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Thomas, Alito; Kennedy (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.