- The Ruin (Ukrainian history)
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=The Ruin
date=June 29 ,1659 -May 16 ,1686
place=Ukraine :Right-bank Ukraine ,Left-bank Ukraine , and Zaporizhia
result=Eternal Peace Treaty ; Partition ofUkraine betweenPolish-Lithuanian Commonwealth andTsardom of Russia ; Left-Bank Ukraine withKyiv and the territories of the Zaporizhia came under Russian control, while Right-Bank Ukraine came under Polish control.
combatant1= (from 1669)
combatant2=
commander1=
commander2=
strength1=
strength2=
casualties1=
casualties2=The Ruin ( _uk. Руїна) is a period of Ukrainian history from the death of
hetman Bohdan Khmelnitsky in1657 and until ascension ofhetman Ivan Mazepa in1687 . This period is characterised by continuous strife,civil war , and foreign intervention of Ukraine's neighbours. The Ukrainian saying of the time: "Від Богдана до Івана не було гетьмана" ("there was no hetman between Bohdan (Khmelnitsky) and Ivan (Mazepa)") — accurately summarises the chaotic events of this period.Background
The Ruin started after the death of
hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky who delivered the country from centuries of Polish domination though years of Wars of Liberation and its entry into theTsardom of Moscow . While Khmelnytsky was a charismatic and influential leader, clearly one of the prominent figures in Ukrainian history, he did not, however, establish clear rules of succession and in his will wanted his son Yurii to become the new hetman. Yurii Khmelnytsky was unfortunately not only young and inexperienced but clearly lacked the charisma and the leadership qualities of his father. As a result, he was used as a puppet by different foreign powersFact|date=July 2007 and when he ruled on two different occasions the result of his reign was devastating for Ukraine.Fact|date=July 2007Start of Civil War
Out of many contenders for the hetman's office one was
Ivan Vyhovsky . A general chancellor of the Hetmanate and an adviser toBohdan Khmelnytsky himself, who in his will the hetman wanted to see Ivan as Yurii's right hand. Having been elected a hetman himself, in1657 he was trying to establish a more independent policy fromMoscow and found himself in a middle of acivil war , which in many instances was instigated by many ofUkraine 's neighbours. In particular,Russian military commanders in many of Ukrainian cities supported his contenders for the office and thereby keptcivil war growing in intensity and size. Fact|date=July 2007 In this situation Vyhovsky was forced to enter into negotiations withPoland , a rival ofMoscow and a contender for Ukrainian territories which it had lost during the Liberation war of1648 -1654 . The result was theTreaty of Hadiach in1658 with favourable conditions forUkraine .Fact|date=July 2007At this period
Russia was involved in long and protracted war withPoland and was conquering some of its territories. Vyhovsky's alliance withPoland alarmed Tsar Alexis, who treated this as a violation of theTreaty of Pereyaslav and sent a military contingent to Ukraine in1658 to pursue Vyhovsky. In addition to exterminating hetman's supporters, led by Prince Romodanovsky was involved in wide spread robbery and abuse of the local population. [http://www.library.kr.ua/elib/markevich/tom2/malor2.html]Even though the Russian forces and their allies were routed at the battle of Konotop in
1659 , Vyhovsky's rule was doomed mainly because his alliance with the Poles remained very unpopular among the poorer and also because he neglected the lower classes of the Ukrainian society and sought support among the rich Cossack elite who were quick to betray him either toPoland or toMoscow .Succession of hetmans
What followed was a bloody and destructive
civil war during which a number of hetmans tried to establish their rule in different parts of Ukraine. Virtually all of them tried to ally themselves with foreign powers:Tsardom of Russia , thePolish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , theOttoman Empire . TheTreaty of Pereyaslav that alliedUkraine withMoscow had been rewritten as Yurii Khmelnytsky was forced to amend the treaty with even more favourable conditions. If alliance with Orthodox Russia was not popular with some hetmans, alliance with non-Orthodox powers, such as Poland, Crimea, or Turkey, was even less popular. Fact|date=July 2007During this period a number of hetmans stayed in power for short periods of time and often controlled only parts of the country:
*
Yakym Somko (1660–1663)
*Yurii Khmelnytsky (1659–1662) (1678-1681)(in theRight-bank Ukraine )
*Pavlo Teteria (1663–1665) (in theRight-bank Ukraine )
*Petro Doroshenko (1665–1672) (in theRight-bank Ukraine )
*Ivan Briukhovetsky (1663-1668)
*Demian Mnohohrishny (1669-1672)
*Mykhailo Khanenko (1669-1674) (in theRight-bank Ukraine )
*Ivan Samoylovych (1672–1687)With
Ivan Mazepa coming to office in1687 and with stability that followed, the period of the Ruin was effectively over.Sources
* [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-30068/Ukraine The Ruin (from Ukraine), Encyclopedia Britannica]
* [http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages/R/U/Ruin.htm Encyclopedia of Ukraine]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.