- Fruit of the poisonous tree
Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal metaphor in the United States used to describe evidence gathered with the aid of information obtained illegally. [cite book |title=Understanding Criminal Procedure |last=Dressler |first=Joshua |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2002 |edition=3rd edition |publisher=LexisNexis |location=Newark, NJ |isbn=0820554057 |pages= |url= ] The logic of the terminology is that if the source of the evidence (the "tree") is tainted, then anything gained from it (the "fruit") would be likewise.
Such evidence is not generally admissible in court. [cite book |last=Gaines |first=Larry |authorlink= |coauthors=Miller, LeRoy |title=Criminal Justice In Action: The Core |year=2006 |publisher=Thomson/Wadsworth |location=Belmont, CA |isbn=0495003050 ] For example, if a police officer conducted an unconstitutional (Fourth Amendment) search of a home and obtained a key to a locker in a train station, thus obtaining evidence of a crime from the locker, then that evidence would more than likely be excluded in accordance with the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The discovery of a witness is not evidence in itself because the witness is attenuated by separate interviews, in-court testimony and their own statements.
The doctrine is an extension of the
exclusionary rule , which, subject to some exceptions, prevents evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being admitted in a criminal trial. Like the exclusionary rule, the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine is intended to deter police from using illegal means to obtain evidence.The doctrine is subject to three main exceptions. The tainted evidence will be admissible if (1) it was discovered in part as a result of an independent, untainted source; (2) it would inevitably have been discovered despite the tainted source; or (3) the chain of causation between the illegal action and the tainted evidence is too attenuated.
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine stems from the 1920 case of "
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States ". [See also cite journal |last=Bransdorfer |first=Mark S. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1987 |month= |title=Miranda Right-to-Counsel Violations and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine |journal=Indiana Law Journal |volume=62 |issue= |pages=1061 |issn=00196665 |url= |accessdate= |quote= ]The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree phrase is a reference to the biblical passage originally found in bible|Matthew 7:17-20.
Notes and references
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.