- Dan (biblical city)
Dan ( _he. דן), formerly named Laish, is a town mentioned by the
Bible , in which it is portrayed as the northernmost town of theKingdom of Israel , and formerly as the main town of theTribe of Dan . The town has been securely identified with the archaeological site known as "Tel el-Qadi"Fact|date=July 2008, which consequently has become known to Israelis as "Tel Dan".To the west of Dan are the southern mountains of the Lebanon range, while to the east and north were the
Hermon mountains. Melting snow from the Hermon mountains provides the majority of the water of theJordan River , and passes through Dan making the immediate area highly fertile. The lush vegetation that results makes the area around Dan seem somewhat out of place in the otherwisearid region around it.Pre Israelite Town
According to the archaeological remains of Tel el Qadi, the town was originally occupied in the late
Neolithic era (c 4500BC), although at some time in the fourth millennium BC it became abandoned; the abandonment lasting for up to 1000 years.According to the
Book of Judges , prior to the Tribe of Dan occupying the land, the town was known as "Laish", and allied with theSidonians ; this presumably indicates they werePhoenicia ns (Sidonians were one of the Phoenician groups), who may or may not have beenCanaan ite ["Peake's commentary on the Bible ", passim] . The alliance had little practical benefit due to the remoteness of the town fromSidon , and the intervening Lebanon mountains ["Peake's commentary on the Bible"] . As a consequence of the Hermon mountains, the town was also isolated from theAssyria ns andAram [ibid] ; theSeptuagint mentions that the town was unable to have an alliance with the Aramaeans. Themasoretic text does not mention the Aramaeans, but instead states that the town had no relationship with "any man" - textual scholars believe that this is atypographic error , with "adham" ("man") being a mistake for "aram" [ibid] .Occupancy by the Tribe of Dan
According to the narrative in Judges concerning
Micah's Idol [Judges 17 and 18] , the Tribe of Dan did not at that point have any Israelite territory to their name [Judges 18:1] , and so, after scouting out the land, eventually decided to attack Laish, as the land around it was fertile, and the town was unmilitarised and did not have practical alliances. Most Biblical scholars now believe that the Tribe of Dan originated as one of theSea Peoples , hence "remaining on their ships" in the earlySong of Deborah , and not having Israelite land to their name ["Australian Journal of Biblical Archaeology", Yigael Yadin, "And Dan, Why Did He Remain in Ships?" 1968] ["Biblical Archaeology Review ", "When Canaanites and Philistines Ruled Ashkelon", March/April 1991] , though conservative scholars argueFact|date=February 2007 that the Tribe of Dan were migrating due to being forced out of their original lands by thePhilistines .The narrative in Judges goes on to describe the Tribe of Dan brutally defeating the people of Laish and burning the town to the ground, after which they built their own town in the same spot. However, textual scholars believe that the whole narrative concerning Micah's idol is a slur on the sanctuary at Dan, by a writer or writers who were opposed to the presence of idols there, and hence that the apparent brutality may not reflect historic reality ["Peake's commentary on the Bible"] . The narrative states that Laish subsequently became known as "Dan", after the name of the tribe, and that it housed a sanctuary filled with idols, which remained in use until the "time of captivity of the land" and the time that the "house of God" ceased to be in
Shiloh . Scholars think that the former refers to the Assyrian conquest of theKingdom of Israel byTiglath-pileser III in 733/732 BCE, and that the latter refers to the time ofHezekiah 's religious reform [ibid] ; an alternative possibility, however, supported by a minority of scholars, is that "time of captivity of the land" is a typographic error and should read "time of captivity of the ark", referring to the battle ofEben-Ezer , and the Philistine capture of the Ark, and that the ceasing of the "house of God" being in Shiloh refers to this also ["Jewish Encyclopedia "] .As part of the Kingdom of Israel
According to the
Book of Kings ,Jeroboam I set up an idol of a golden calf at Dan, and another atBethel [1 Kings ?:?] . Textual scholars believe that this is where theElohist story ofAaron 'sGolden Calf actually originates, due to opposition in some sections of Israelite society (including the Elohist themselves) to the seeming idol-worship of Jeroboam [Richard Elliott Friedmann , "Who Wrote the Bible?"] . However, Biblical scholars believe that Jeroboam was actually trying to outdo the sanctuary at Jerusalem (Solomon's Temple ), by creating a seat for God that spanned the whole kingdom of Israel, rather than just the small space above theArk of the Covenant in Jerusalem; the "seat" for God in the Jerusalem sanctuary was represented by acherubim on either side, while scholars believe that Jeroboam was using the calves to represent the sides of his seat for God - implying his whole kingdom was equal in holiness to the Ark [ibid]Dan suffered in the era of expansion by the Aramaeans, due to being the closest city to them in the kingdom of Israel. The several incursions indicated by the Book of Kings suggest that Dan changed hands at least four times between the kingdom of Israel and Aramaeans, around the time that Israel was ruled by
Ahab and the Aramaeans byBen Hadad I , and their successors. Around this time, theTel Dan stele was created by the Aramaeans, during one of the periods of their control of Dan. When the Assyrian empire expanded to the south, the kingdom of Israel initially became a vassal state, but after rebelling, the Assyrians invaded, the town fell toTiglath-pileser III in 733/732 BCE.ee also
*
Baalbek
*Micah's Idol
*Tel Dan
*Tribe of Dan
*Dan, Israel Citations and notes
External links
* [http://www.biblelight.org/arch3.htm Biblical references]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.