Convergence in measure

Convergence in measure can refer to two distinct mathematical concepts which both generalize the concept of convergence in probability.

Definitions

Let $f, f_n\ (n \in \mathbb N): X \to \mathbb R$ be measurable functions on a measure space (X,Σ,μ). The sequence (f_n) is said to converge globally in measure to f if for every ε > 0,

$\lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(\{x \in X: |f(x)-f_n(x)|\geq \varepsilon\}) = 0$,

and to converge locally in measure to f if for every ε > 0 and every $F \in \Sigma$ with $\mu (F) < \infty$,

$\lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(\{x \in F: |f(x)-f_n(x)|\geq \varepsilon\}) = 0$.

Convergence in measure can refer to either global convergence in measure or local convergence in measure, depending on the author.

Properties

Throughout, f and f_n (n $\in$ N) are measurable functions X → R.

• Global convergence in measure implies local convergence in measure. The converse, however, is false; i.e., local convergence in measure is strictly weaker than global convergence in measure, in general.

• If, however, $\mu (X)<\infty$ or, more generally, if all the f_n vanish outside some set of finite measure, then the distinction between local and global convergence in measure disappears.

• If μ is σ-finite and (f_n) converges (locally or globally) to f in measure, there is a subsequence converging to f almost everywhere.

• If μ is σ-finite, (f_n) converges to f locally in measure if and only if every subsequence has in turn a subsequence that converges to f almost everywhere.

• In particular, if (f_n) converges to f almost everywhere, then (f_n) converges to f locally in measure. The converse is false.

• Fatou's lemma and the monotone convergence theorem hold if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.^{[clarification needed]}

• If μ is σ-finite, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem also holds if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.^{[clarification needed]}

• If X = [a,b] ⊆ R and μ is Lebesgue measure, there are sequences (g_n) of step functions and (h_n) of continuous functions converging globally in measure to f.

• If f and f_n (n ∈ N) are in L^p(μ) for some p > 0 and (f_n) converges to f in the p-norm, then (f_n) converges to f globally in measure. The converse is false.

• If f_n converges to f in measure and g_n converges to g in measure then f_n + g_n converges to f + g in measure. Additionally, if the measure space is finite, f_ng_n also converges to fg.

Counterexamples

Let $X = \mathbb R$, μ be Lebesgue measure, and f the constant function with value zero.

• The sequence $f_n = \chi_{[n,\infty)}$ converges to f locally in measure, but does not converge to f globally in measure.

• The sequence $f_n = \chi_{[\frac{j}{2^k},\frac{j+1}{2^k}]}$ where $k = \lfloor \log_2 n\rfloor$ and j = n − 2^k

(The first five terms of which are $\chi_{\left[0,1\right]},\;\chi_{\left[0,\frac12\right]},\;\chi_{\left[\frac12,1\right]},\;\chi_{\left[0,\frac14\right]},\;\chi_{\left[\frac14,\frac12\right]}$) converges to f locally in measure; but for no x does f_n(x) converge to zero. Hence (f_n) fails to converge to f almost everywhere.

• The sequence $f_n = n\chi_{\left[0,\frac1n\right]}$ converges to f almost everywhere (hence also locally in measure), but not in the p-norm for any $p \geq 1$.

Topology

There is a topology, called the topology of (local) convergence in measure, on the collection of measurable functions from X such that local convergence in measure corresponds to convergence on that topology. This topology is defined by the family of pseudometrics

$\{\rho_F : F \in \Sigma,\ \mu (F) < \infty\},$

where

$\rho_F(f,g) = \int_F \min\{|f-g|,1\}\, d\mu$.

Because this topology is generated by a family of pseudometrics, it is uniformizable. Working with uniform structures instead of topologies allows us to formulate uniform properties such as Cauchyness.

References

• D.H. Fremlin, 2000. Measure Theory. Torres Fremlin.
• H.L. Royden, 1988. Real Analysis. Prentice Hall.
• G.B. Folland 1999, Section 2.4. Real Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.