California Celebrities Rights Act

The Celebrities Rights Act or Celebrity Rights Act was passed in California in 1985 and it extended the personality rights for a celebrity to 70 years after his or her death. [cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Friedemann O’Brien Goldberg & Zarian Names Bela G. Lugosi Of Counsel |url=http://www.metnews.com/articles/bela021402.htm |quote=But an appeals court overturned that decision and finally in 1979, the California Supreme Court, in Lugosi v. Universal Pictures, ruled that Lugosi did not inherit any rights that Universal Pictures infringed. It said the Lugosi name and likeness could not pass on to the actor’s heirs, since the right of publicity died with Lugosi. However, the California Assembly passed a “Celebrities Rights Act” in 1985 which said that rights of publicity survive the celebrity’s death and descend to heirs by wills, among other means. |publisher=Metropolitan News-Enterprise |date= |accessdate=2008-04-20 ] Previously, the 1979 "Lugosi v. Universal Pictures" decision by the California Supreme Court held that Bela Lugosi's personality rights could not pass to his heirs, as a copyright would have. The court ruled that any rights of publicity, and rights to his image, terminated with Lugosi's death. cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Who Can Inherit Fame? |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,952724,00.html |quote=Ten years later, the son and the widow of Bela Lugosi, star of the Dracula films, tried to take this doctrine a step further. They argued that this right was essentially property and therefore should pass on to heirs. In a California suit, they asked the courts to stop Universal Pictures from merchandising 70 Dracula products, ranging from jigsaw puzzles to belt buckles, and sought compensation based on the profits. Citing the First Amendment, Universal replied that the design of merchandise is a form of free speech that should not be restrained by anyone's heirs. Besides, said Universal's lawyer, Robert Wilson, Lugosi "attained fame and fortune because the company made and distributed the movies he starred in." After eleven years of wrangling, a trial judge decided in favor of the Lugosis, giving them $70,000 and barring Universal from merchandising Lugosi's likeness. |publisher="Time" |date= |accessdate=2007-07-21 ]

Civil Code section 3344 is for the publicity rights of living persons, while Civil Code section 3344.1, known as the "Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act," grants statutory post-mortem rights which prohibit the unsanctioned use of the "name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness on or in products, merchandise or goods" of any person. Similar laws have been enacted by 12 other states in the United States. [http://www.studio-international.co.uk/reports/elvis.htm] .

Among the uses exempt from the Astaire act:

The largest personality rights licensing agency is The Roger Richman Agency, which is owned by Corbis.

Cases

* In 1998 Princess Diana's estate sued the Franklin Mint for selling products bearing her likeness. The lawsuit filed May 18, 1998 in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles said the Franklin Mint "failed to obtain consent to use Princess Diana's identity and trademark ... and embarked on a campaign to profit from Princess Diana's death."
* "Shaw Family Archives Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.", 486 F.Supp.2d 309 (S.D.N.Y., 2007) ruled on May 7, 2007 that in regard to Marilyn Monroe, because she died before California's Celebrity Rights Act was passed in 1985, and the state of New York does not recognize a right of publicity after the artist's death, her name, image, and voice are now in the public domain in the states of California and New York. By implication, they would also be in the public domain in any state that, at the time of Monroe's death in 1962, did not recognize a right of publicity that survived the artist's death. In response to that court ruling, California passed legislation that created descendible rights of publicity that last 70 years after death, retroactively for any person deceased after January 1, 1938. [David Walker, " [http://www.pdn-pix.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003658099 California Adopts New Right of Publicity Law] ", "PDNonline".] The New York State Assembly is passing similar legislation. [New York State Assembly, [http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A08836 Bill A08836] .]

Top earning dead celebrities

The following information comes from "Forbes" in 2007.
*Elvis Presley $49M
*John Lennon $44M

References

Further reading

*Peter L. Felcher, and Edward L. Rubin; "The Descendibility of the Right of Publicity: Is There Commercial Life after Death?" "The Yale Law Journal", Vol. 89, No. 6 (May, 1980), pp. 1125-1132

External links

* [http://www.musicblob.it/archivio-documenti/lugosi-v-universal-pictures-1979-25-c3d-813/ Lugosi v. Universal Pictures (1979) 25 C3d 813]
* [http://www.musicblob.it/archivio-documenti/california-civil-code-section-3344-33441-astaire-celebrity-image-protection-act/ California Civil Code - Section 3344 - 3344.1 (Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act)]
* [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4822573 NPR: Personality Rights for Dead Actors]
* [http://www.albert-einstein.net/articles/latimes.html Los Angeles Times]
* [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5410#attachments Stanford Cyberlaw]
* [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/Shaw+Family+Archives+v.+MMLLC.pdf Shaw v. Marilyn]