- Uriel da Costa
Uriel da Costa (c. 1585 – April 1640) or Uriel Acosta (from the
Latin form of his Portuguese surname, "Costa", or "da Costa ") was aphilosopher andskeptic fromPortugal .Life
Da Costa was born in
Porto with the name Gabriel da Costa. He hailed from a "converso " family that had converted fromJudaism to Catholicism in order to avoid the civilpersecution s of Jews. A member of a devoutly religious family, his father had been a Catholicpriest who was well-versed in Canon law.Da Costa also occupied an ecclesiastical office. While a student of canon law, he began to read the
Bible and contemplate it seriously. He was aware that his family had Jewish origins, and in the course of his studies, he began to consider a return to Judaism. After his father died, he began to very carefully reveal his newfound sentiments to his family. Ultimately, in 1617, the whole family decided to return to Judaism; they fled Portugal forAmsterdam , which would soon become a thriving center of the Sephardicdiaspora .However, upon arriving in
the Netherlands , Da Costa very quickly became disenchanted with the kind of Judaism he saw in practice there. He came to believe that therabbi nic leadership was too consumed byritual ism and legalistic posturing. In 1624 he published abook titled "An Examination of the Traditions of thePharisee s" which questioned the fundamental idea of the immortality of the soul. Da Costa believed that this was not an idea deeply rooted in biblical Judaism, but rather had been formulated primarily by the Rabbis. The work further pointed out the discrepancies between biblical Judaism andRabbinic Judaism ; he declared the latter to be an accumulation of mechanical ceremonies and practices. In his view, it was thoroughly devoid of spiritual and philosophical concepts.The book became very controversial and was burned publicly. Da Costa was called before the rabbinic leadership of Amsterdam for uttering blasphemous views against Judaism and
Christianity . He was fined a significant sum and excommunicated.He ultimately fled Amsterdam for
Hamburg ,Germany (also a prominent Sephardic center), where he was ostracized from the local Jewish community. He did not understand German, which further compounded his difficulties. Left with no place to turn, in 1633 he returned to Amsterdam and sought a reconciliation with the community. He claimed that he would go back to being "an ape amongst the apes"; he would follow the traditions and practices, but with little real conviction.However, he soon again began to express rationalistic and skeptical views; he expressed doubts whether biblical law was divinely sanctioned or whether it was simply written down by
Moses . He came to the conclusion that allreligion was ahuman invention. Ultimately he came to reject formalized, ritualized religion. In his view, religion was to be based only onnatural law ;God had no use for empty ceremony. In many ways his beliefs were Deistic; he believed that God resides innature , which is full ofpeace and harmony, whereas organized religion is marked by blood,violence , and strife.Eventually da Costa came across two Christians who expressed to him their desire to convert to Judaism. In accordance with his views, he dissuaded them from doing so. For the communal leadership of Amsterdam, this was the final straw. He was thus again excommunicated. For seven years he lived in virtual isolation, shunned by his family and loved ones. Ultimately, the loneliness was too much for him to handle, and he again returned to
Holland and recanted.As a punishment for his heretical views he was publicly given thirty-nine lashes at the Portuguese
synagogue in Amsterdam. He was then forced to lie on the floor while the trampled over him. This left him so demoralized and depressed that he was unable to live with himself. After writing his autobiography, "Exemplar Humanae Vitae" (1640), in which he wrote about his experience as a victim ofintolerance , he set out to end the lives of both his cousin and himself. Seeing his relative approach one day, he grabbed a pistol and pulled the trigger. It misfired. Then he reached for another, turned it on himself, and fired, dying, they said, a terrible death.Ultimately there are many ways to view Uriel da Costa. He has been seen as a crusader of free thought and an early precursor of modern
biblical criticism . Internally to Judaism, he was seen by many as both a troublemaking heretic andmartyr against the intolerance of the Orthodox Jewish establishment. He has also been seen as a precursor toBaruch Spinoza .Da Costa is also indicative of the difficulty that many "
Marrano s" faced upon their arrival in an organized Jewish community. As a Crypto-Jew in Iberia, he read the Bible and was impressed by it. Yet upon confronting an organized Rabbinic community, he was not equally impressed by the established ritual and religious doctrine of Rabbinical Judaism, such as the Oral Law. As da Costa himself pointed out, traditionalPharisee and Rabbinic doctrine had been contested in the past by theSadducees and theKaraite s.Writings
*"Propostas contra a tradição" (Portuguese for "Propositions against tradition"), ca. 1616.
*"Exame das tradições farisaicas" ((Portuguese for "Examination of Pharisaic traditions", 1623. Here, da Costa argues that the humansoul is not immortal.
*"Exemplar humanae vitae" (Latin for "Example of a human life"), 1640.Gutzkow's "Uriel Acosta"
The German writer
Karl Gutzkow (1811–1878), in 1846, in the midst of the liberal milieu that led to theRevolutions of 1848 wrote a play about his life, entitled simply "Uriel Acosta". This would later become the first classic play to be translated intoYiddish , and would long be a standard ofYiddish theater . The first translation into Yiddish was byOsip Mikhailovich Lerner , who staged the play at theMariinski Theater inOdessa ,Ukraine (then part ofImperial Russia ) in 1881, shortly after theassassination ofTsar Alexander II.Abraham Goldfaden rapidly followed with a rival production, anoperetta , at Odessa'sRemesleni Club , andIsrael Rosenberg promptly followed with his own translation for a production inŁódź (modern-dayPoland ). Rosenberg's production starredJacob Adler in the title role; the play would remain a signature piece in Adler's repertoire to the end of his stage career, the first of the several roles through which he developed the persona that he referred to as "the Grand Jew".Hermann Jellinek (brother ofAdolf Jellinek ) also wrote a book entitled "Uriel Acosta".References
* [http://www.saudades.org/uriel.html The Tragic Life of Uriel Da Costa]
* Adler, Jacob, "A Life on the Stage: A Memoir", translated and with commentary by Lulla Rosenfeld, Knopf, New York, 1999, ISBN 0-679-41351-0. 200 "et. seq".
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.