- Avot of Rabbi Natan
Avot de-Rabbi Nathan ( _he. אבות דרבי נתן"'), usually printed together with the
minor tractates of theTalmud , is a Jewishaggadic work probably compiled in thegeonic era (c.700–900 CE). Although Avot de-Rabbi Nathan is the first and longest of the "minor tractates", it probably does not belong in that collection chronologically, having more the character of a latemidrash . In the form now extant it contains a mixture ofMishnah andMidrash , and may be technically designated as a homiletical exposition of the Mishnaic tractatePirkei Avoth , having for its foundation an older recension (version) of that tractate. It may be considered as a kind of "tosefta " or "gemarah " to the Mishna Avot, which does not possess a traditional gemarah. Avot de-Rabbi Nathan contains many sentences, proverbs, and incidents that are not found anywhere else in the earlyrabbinical literature Harv|Cashdan|1965. Other rabbinical sayings appear in a more informal style than what is found in the canonical Mishna Avot redacted byJudah I .The two existing forms (recensions) of Avot d'Reb Natan
Touching its original form, its age, and its dependence on earlier or later recensions of the Mishnah, there are many opinions, all of which are ably discussed in
S. Schechter 's introduction. There are two recensions of this work, one of which is usually printed with theBabylonian Talmud in the appendix to "Seder Nezikin" [the ninth volume] , preceding the so-calledMinor Treatises , and another which, until the late 1800s, existed inmanuscript only. In 1887Solomon Schechter published the two recensions in parallel columns, contributing to the edition a critical introduction and valuable notes. There were likely other recensions as well, since the medieval rabbis quote from other versions.In order to distinguish the two recensions, the one which is printed with the Talmud may be called A; and the other, B. The former is divided into forty-one chapters, and the latter into forty-eight. Schechter has proved that recension B is cited only by Spanish authors.
Rashi knows of recension A only.The methodology
The content of the two recensions differ from each other considerably, although the method is the same in both. The separate sentences of the Mishnah Avot are generally taken as texts, which are either briefly explained—the ethical lessons contained therein being supported by reference to
Biblical passages—or fully illustrated by narratives and legends. Sometimes long digressions are made by introducing subjects which are connected only loosely with the text. This method may be illustrated by the following example: Commenting on the sentence ofSimon the Just , in Pirkei Avoth, i. 2, which designates charity as one of the three pillars on which the world rests, the Avot de-Rabbi Nathan (recension A) reads as follows:The chapters of the two recensions of Avot de-Rabbi Nathan correspond with those of the Mishnah Avot as follows:
*Chaps. i. to xi. of recension A and chaps. i. to xxiii. of recension B correspond with chap. i. 1-11 in Pirkei Avoth, dealing with saying of theZugoth .
*Chaps. xii. to xix. of A and chaps. xxiv. to xxix. of B correspond with chap. i. 12-18 and the whole of chap. ii. in Pirkei Avoth, dealing with the teachings ofHillel ,Shammai ,Yohanan ben Zakkai and his disciples
*Chaps. xx. to xxx. of A and chaps. xxx. to xxxv. of B correspond with chaps. iii. and iv. in Pirkei Avoth, an independentmishnaic collection
*Chaps. xxxi. to xli. of A and chaps. xxxvi. to xlviii. of B correspond with chap. v. in Pirḳei Avoth, a collection of anonymous statement related by formAuthorship
Rabbi Nathan , whose name appears in the title of the work under treatment, cannot possibly have been its only author, since he flourished about the middle of the 2nd century, or a generation prior to the author of the Mishnah. Besides, several authorities are quoted who flourished a long time after R. Nathan; for instance,Rabbi Joshua ben Levi . The designation "De-Rabbi Nathan" may perhaps be explained by the circumstance that R. Nathan is one of the first authorities mentioned in the opening chapter of the work (but not the first, that beingYose ha-Galili ). Perhaps the school of the tannaite R. Nathan originated the work, however. Probably due to political differences that Rabbi Nathan had withShimon ben Gamliel , Rabbi Nathan's name does not appear in the version of Avot compiled by redactor of the MishnaRebbi (the son of the aforementioned Shimon ben Gamliel). However, it is known that Rabbi Nathan made an independent collection Harv|Cashdan|1965, and it is possible that Avot de-Rabbi Nathan derives from that source.It is also called
Tosefta to Abot (see Horowitz, "Uralte Toseftas," i. 6,Frankfort-on-the-Main , 1889; Brüll's "Jahrbücher," ix. 139 et seq.). The two recensions of the work in their present shape evidently have different authors; but who they were cannot be ascertained. Probably they belonged to the period of theGeonim , between the 8th and 9th centuries.Translations
*A Latin translation of Abot de-Rabbi Nathan was published by
Franz Tayler , London, 1654: "Tractatus de Patribus Rabbi Nathan Auctore, in Linguam Latinam Translatus".
*An English version is given byM. L. Rodkinson in his translation of theBabylonian Talmud , i. 9, New York, 1900.
*"The Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan", translated byJudah Goldin ,Yale University Press , 1955. (reprinted 1990)
*" 'Aboth d'Rabbi Nathan, translated into English with Introduction and Notes", by Eli Cashdan, in "The Minor Tractates of the Talmud", Soncino, 1965.
*"Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan: Abot De Rabbi Nathan", Anthony J. Saldarini, Brill Academic, 1975.
*"The Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan",Jacob Neusner , University of South Florida Press, 1986.Commentaries
Schechter gives the commentaries to Abot de-Rabbi Nathan in his edition, xxvii. et seq. Emendations were made by
Benjamin Motal in his collectanea, called Tummat Yesharim, Venice, 1622. Commentaries have been written by Eliezer Lipman ofZamość ,Zolkiev , 1723; by Elijah ben Abraham with notes byThe Vilna Gaon , Wilna, 1833; byAbraham Witmand , Ahabat Ḥesed, Amsterdam, 1777; and byJoshua Falk , Binyan Yehoshu'a,Dyhernfurth , 1788.References
*Harvard reference | Surname=Cashdan | Given=Eli | Year= 1965 | Chapter=Introduction | Editor=A. Cohen | Title=The Minor Tractates of the Talmud: Massektoth Ketannoth, Volume I | Edition= | Publisher=
Soncino Press | Place=London | URL=| Access-date=.
*JewishEncyclopedia. The JE cites the following works
**Leopold Zunz , "Gottesdienstliche Vorträge der Juden,", 1st ed., pp. 108 et seq.;
**Solomon Taussig , "Neweh Shalom I", Munich, 1872, in which pamphlet a part of Abot de-Rabbi Nathan, recension B, was for the first time published, according to a manuscript of the Munich Library;
**Solomon Schechter , "Abot de-Rabbi Nathan," Vienna, 1887;
**"Monatsschrift", 1887, pp. 374-383;
**Moritz Steinschneider , "Hebr. Bibl." xii. 75 et seq.
**Moritz Steinschneider, Cat. Bodl. col. 2034;
**Isaac ben Jacob Benjacob , "Oẓar ha-Sefarim", p. 654.External links
* [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=355&letter=A Jewish Encyclopedia article for Avot of Rabbi Nathan]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.