- Francis Langley
Francis Langley (1548 – 1602) was a theatre builder and theatrical producer in
Elizabethan era London . [William Ingram, "A London Life in the Brazen Age: Francis Langley, 1548–1602", Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1978.] AfterJames Burbage andPhilip Henslowe , Langley was the third significant entrepreneurial figure active at the height of the development ofEnglish Renaissance theatre . [F. E. Halliday "A Shakespeare Companion 1564–1964." Baltimore, Penguin, 1964; p. 273.] [Andrew Gurr, "The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642," Third edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992; pp. 42-5 and ff.]Background
Langley was a goldsmith by profession, and also held the office of "Alnager and Searcher of Cloth" — he was an official quality inspector of fabric. His brother-in-law was a clerk for the Privy Council; Langley had been appointed to his Alnager's post through a recommendation from Sir
Francis Walsingham . Langley became involved in theatre in the mid-1590s, and operated much as Henslowe did, [E. K. Chambers, "The Elizabethan Stage," 4 Volumes, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1923; Vol. 1, p. 368 n. 3.] contracting individual actors and troupes to work exclusively for him, and serving as their reliable creditor (a cynic might use the ugly term "loan shark"). Langley, however, did not leave the relatively abundant documentary record that Henslowe did; his affairs are much more mysterious and difficult to untangle.wan Theatre
Langley's central achievement in Elizabethan drama was the building of the Swan Theatre in
Southwark , on the south shore of theRiver Thames across from the City of London, in 1595–96. [Chambers, Vol. 2, pp. 411-14.] [Halliday, p. 481.] The Swan was the fourth in the series of large public playhouses in London, after Burbage'sThe Theatre (1576), Lanman's Curtain (1577) and Henslowe's Rose (1587) — though the Swan was in its time the most well-appointed and visually striking of the four. Langley had purchased the Manor of Paris Garden as early as May 1589, for the sum of £850. (Paris Garden was a "liberty," at the extreme western end of theBankside district of Southwark. The Manor in question had been part of the monastery of Bermondsey, which, like all such establishments in England, had passed into private hands after Henry VIII'sDissolution of the Monasteries . In November of 1594, the Lord Mayor of London complained to Lord Burghley about Langley's plans to build another theatre on the Bankside. [Chambers, Vol 4, pp. 316-17.] (The Rose and theBeargarden , thebear-baiting ring, were already located there.)The Lord Mayor's protest had no discernible effect; the Swan was certainly ready by February 1597, when Langley signed a contract with
Pembroke's Men to play at his new theatre. Their contract mentions that the theatre had already been in use for plays, which points to activity in the summer of 1596. Theplaying company involved is not named; but given Shakespeare's odd connection with Langley (see below), it might have been theLord Chamberlain's Men ."The Isle of Dogs"
If there was a period of good business in the spring and summer of 1597, it definitely did not last: in July came the scandal centered on
Thomas Nashe andBen Jonson 's play "The Isle of Dogs." On July 28 the Privy Council, angered by what it termed "very seditious and scandalous matter" in that play, ordered all the London theatres shut down for the remainder of the summer. When the prohibition on the other theatres was lifted in the autumn, it was kept on Langley's Swan, dealing his theatre business a serious blow. (Langley was in trouble with the authorities over another matter as well, a stolen diamond that he had fenced or attempted to fence; and this may well have been an additional reason for the suppression of his theatre.)Five of the actors in Pembroke's Men, now out of work, defected to the
Admiral's Men , and apparently took some of the company's playscripts with them. Langley sued them, though the outcome of the case is unclear from the surviving records. [Chambers, Vol. 2, pp. 131-3.] It seems likely that Langley reached some kind of resolution with Henslowe, for the actors remained with their new company. Langley's position at this time could not have been a strong one. The remnant of the Pembroke's Men company, perhaps with some replacement members, was touring outside of London in 1598–99, in Bath, Bristol, Dover, and other towns.Boar's Head
His harsh experience with the Swan Theatre did not entirely sour Langley on the business of drama. The Boar's Head Inn, outside the City of London's medieval walls on the northeast, had long been a venue for play-acting in previous decades; it was converted to a theatre in 1598 by a partnership between Oliver Woodliffe and Richard Samwell. In November of that year, however, Langley bought Woodliffe's share in the concern. The original conversion proved unsatisfactory, and a major reconstruction was launched in 1599. At the same time the litigious Langley launched a series of lawsuits against Samwell concerning the costs of refitting the theatre — a legal campaign that ended with Langley's death in 1601. [Gurr, pp. 139-40.] (Samwell must have been relieved. But the Boar's Head never succeeded as a theatre, and the project failed after 1604.)
Post mortem
After Langley's death, his Paris Garden estate was sold in January 1602. His theatre lived on after him, hosting miscellaneous events—fencing contests, boxing matches, stage-magic spectacles — and eventually becoming a venue for drama once again; the
Lady Elizabeth's Men played at the Swan in the 1611–13 period. They actedThomas Middleton 's "A Chaste Maid in Cheapside " there in 1613. Eventually the place fell into disrepair; a 1632 pamphlet refers to the building as "fallen to decay, and like a dying swan hanging down her head, seemed to sing her own dirge."hakespeare
Langley also had a cryptic connection with
William Shakespeare . In November of 1596 two writs of attachment, similar to modern restraining orders, were issued to the sheriff ofSurrey , the shire in which Southwark is located. One involves Francis Langley versus two parties named William Gardener and William Wayte; the other involves William Wayte versus Langley, two women named Anne Lee and Dorothy Soer...and William Shakespeare.Shakespeare may have been connected with Pembroke's Men in the early 1590s, since they played at least two of his earliest works, "
Titus Andronicus " and "Henry VI, Part 3 ;" his later company the Lord Chamberlain's Men may have acted a season at the Swan in the summer of 1596. Otherwise, Shakespeare's connection with Langley is obscure. Gardener was a corrupt Surrey justice of the peace, and Wayte was his stepson; Lee and Soer are mere names on a legal document. Gardener died a year later, in November 1597; the story behind this affair remains unknown.References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.