- United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 was adopted unanimously by the
United Nations Security Council on14 October 2006 . The resolution, passed under Chapter VII, Article 41, of the UN Charter, imposes a series of economic and commercial sanctions on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (the DPRK, or North Korea) in the aftermath of that nation's claimed nuclear test of9 October 2006 .Provisions
The resolution's provisions include:
*North Korea must "not conduct any further nuclear test or launch of aballistic missile ", "suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile programme" and "abandon all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programmes in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner".
*The DPRK must also "return immediately to thesix-party talks without precondition".
*Shipments of cargo going to and from North Korea may be stopped and inspected forweapons of mass destruction or associated items (however, there is no "obligation" placed on member states to perform such inspections).
*A ban is placed on imports and exports of "battletank s, armoured combat vehicles, large calibreartillery systems, combat aircraft, attackhelicopter s,warship s, missiles or missile systems", "relatedmateriel including spare parts" and any other items identified by the sanctions committee.
*UN member states must freeze the overseas assets of individuals and companies involved with the DPRK's weapons programmes. An international travel ban is also placed on programme employees and their families.
*UN members are banned from exportingluxury goods to North Korea. [http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20261&Cr=DPRK&Cr1= "Security Council imposes sanctions on DPR Korea after its claimed nuclear test"] , "United Nations ",14 October 2006 ]anctions committee
All the UN's member states are required to report to the Council on the measures they adopt in compliance with the resolution within the next 30 days. The resolution also orders the establishment of a sanctions committee, made up of the UNSC's fifteen current members, to oversee its enforcement and report back to the Council at least every 90 days.
Enforcement
While the resolution does invoke Chapter VII of the
United Nations Charter which allows for enforcement, it does not provide for any use of military force to back up these demands. The UN Security Council had earlier determined to present a united front on this resolution in order to make clear to Pyongyang its condemnation of the reclusive nation's nuclear aspirations, but there remain differences of opinion about the implementation of the resolution. Both China andRussia are concerned about how cargo inspections could provoke confrontations with theNorth Korean Navy , and China declared after passage of the resolution that it will not perform such inspections. TheUnited States compromised on its initial desire to block all imports of military equipment. The final vote on the sanction was delayed by the attempts to change the wording. [ [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/15/wnkor15.xml "Haggling delays N Korea sanctions vote"] , "Daily Telegraph "15 October 2006 ]On 16 November 2006, the French Government enacted the provision allowing for DPRK ships to be searched in international waters. [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6154986.stm "France searches N Korean vessel"] , "
BBC News "16 November 2006 ]North Korean reaction
North Korea's UN envoy
Pak Gil Yon walked out of the chamber after saying Pyongyang "totally rejects" the "unjustifiable" resolution. He said it was "gangster-like" for the Security Council to have adopted a "coercive resolution" while neglecting US pressure on North Korea: "If the United States increases pressure on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the DPRK will continue to take physical countermeasures considering it as adeclaration of war ." [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/6051704.stm "UN slaps sanctions on North Korea"] , "BBC News ",14 October 2006 ]The United States ambassador at the time,
John Bolton , said that it was the second time in three months that the representative of North Korea had rejected a unanimous resolution of the Security Council and walked out. (The other time was after the vote onUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 1695 .) [ UN document |docid=S-PV-5490 |body=Security Council |type=Verbotim Report |meeting=5490 |page=9 |anchor=pg009-bk04 |date=15 July 2006 |speakername=Mr. Bolton | speakernation=United States |accessdate=2008-04-06 ] He went on to add: "It is the contemporary equivalent of Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the rostrum of the General Assembly." [ UN document |docid=S-PV-5551 |body=Security Council |type=Verbotim Report |meeting=5551 |page=9 |anchor=pg009-bk01 |date=14 October 2006 |speakername=Mr. Bolton | speakernation=United States |accessdate=2008-04-06 ]On
17 October 2006 , North Korea said the United Nations had effectively declared war on the country when it imposed sanctions for the country's nuclear test.The DPRK foreign ministry said North Korea wanted peace, but was not afraid of war. A statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency said that North Korea will "mercilessly strike" if its sovereignty is violated. [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6057718.stm "N Korea says sanctions 'are war'"] , "BBC News ",17 October 2006 ]ee also
*
North Korea and weapons of mass destruction
*2006 North Korean nuclear test
*United Nations Security Council Resolution 1695 References
External links
* [http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sc8853.doc.htm Security Council Condemns Nuclear Test by Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] (UNSC press release, with resolution text)
* [http://daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?OpenAgent&DS=s/res/1718(2006)&Lang=E Resolution 1718] (from un.org; PDF)
* [http://www.un.org/webcast/sc.html UN video feeds of Security Council vote]
* [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/10/pyongyang-and-proliferation-un-north.php Pyongyang and Proliferation: The UN North Korea Resolution] ,JURIST
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.