CM/ECF

CM/ECF (Case Management/Electronic Case Files) is the case management and electronic case files system for most of the United States Federal Courts.

History and associated applications

CM/ECF was first implemented in 1996 in the Northern District of Ohio to handle a large number of asbestos cases. Pilot programs were implemented in the Western District of Missouri, the Eastern District of New York and the District of Oregon in late 1997. [Cite news
last=Cromwell
first=Tanya
title=Electronic case filing saves space, time, improves access to documents
newspaper=Kansas City Business Journal
date=2003-02-28|year=2003
url=http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/stories/2003/03/03/focus3.html] National rollout of the system started in bankruptcy courts in 2001, 2002 in district courts, and in 2004 in appellate courts. CM/ECF is not used in state courts, but several states have moved toward implementation of comparable systems for at least some cases. [Cite conference
first=John
last=Matthias
booktitle=
title=E-filing Expansion in State, Local, and Federal courts 2007
Publisher=Nastion Center for State Courts
url=http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Trends/2007/ELFileTrends2007.pdf
year=2007] As of January, 2008, there are about 200 courts running CM/ECF. [cite web
title=About CM/ECF
publisher=Administrative Office of the US Courts
accessdate= 2008-02-18
url=http://www.uscourts.gov/cmecf/cmecf_about.html]

PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), the Federal Judiciary's electronic public access system, still provides access to docket entries as it did before CM/ECF; however, CM/ECF allows for access to pleadings, motion papers, briefs, and other documents filed by the parties and attorneys in the case (with the exception of any documents permitted to be filed under seal or "in camera"). For most documents, an access charge of 8 cents per page (current as of 1/1/07) is levied to defray the cost of maintaining the system. In compliance with the E-Government Act of 2002, written opinions that "set forth a reasoned explanation for a court's decision" [citation
title=Free Written Opinions
url=http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/announcements/general/dc_ecf_opinion.html] are free of charge. To facilitate online access, courts implementing CM/ECF require attorneys to file copies of most litigation papers electronically, instead of or in addition to the traditional filing of paper copies.

Operational description

The main purpose of the system is to fulfill the legal obligation of the Clerk of Court as custodian of court records. Each case is assigned a number in the format D:YY-TT-SSSSS where D=Division Office (most districts are split into divisions), YY=Year, TT=Type (e.g. bk=bankruptcy, cv=civil, cr=criminal), SSSSS=Sequence number. The case number does not contain any type of court identifier.

The main list of the case is the docket sheet. The docket sheet contains a chronological list of each filing and any associated documents (in PDF format) in the case. Each record includes the filing date, docket text, and a link to filed documents. Events can link to past events. Example docket text: "Hearing Held on #18 Motion for Relief from Stay to Proceed With Foreclosure Action Against 123 Corporate Drive, Anytown, Pennsylvania. Filed by ABC Bank Represented by DEWEY CHEATEM (Counsel). ORDER ENTERED (T., Jason) (Entered: 03/01/2007)" -- see .

The application

CM/ECF is a web-based application that is written mainly in Perl and Java which generates HTML with Javascript for some client side validation. The software runs under Solaris or Red Hat Linux OS using Apache webserver. Most courts have moved to a Linux server. An Informix SQL database is used to store the data. The PDF format is used for all documents. In general the software is fairly simple and easily maintained.

Extensive changes were made in version 3.3 to use the YAHOO YUI library. This has increased the complexity of the version 3.2 code. The 3.3 application sports a more modern interface with drop down menus and no frame. Much of the 3.2 simple HTML user interface is still available depending on the menu items selected.

The system is decentralized with each court running its own servers and its own copy of the software. Each court has a live server and separate training and test servers. The test server is used to make changes and install new versions before "going to live." The training server allows users to learn how to use CM/ECF without affecting live cases.

While the application is developed and maintained centrally by the Administrative Office of the US Courts, local staff members configure the application specifically for the local court to conform to local rules and practices. [citation
magazine=The Third Branch
title=Ten Courts of Appeals Move to CM/ECF
volume=38
number=5
url=http://www.uscourts.gov/ttb/05-06/cm_ecf/index.html] Since source code can be modified locally, there is some variability in the application between districts. Most local changes are cosmetic and do not change the core functionality of the application.

The database design centers around the case record and each case record has multiple related records. For example, the "party" table lists parties to the case -- Plaintiff, Defendant, Debtor, etc. In a bankruptcy case the Trustee, US Trustee and certain creditors can become parties to a case. Each party is either pro se or has one or more counsel (attorney) listed. A party can also have a list of aliases, e.g., "Winona Judd DBA 'The Judds'". This feature allows name searches to find the case.

References

External links

* [http://www.uscourts.gov/cmecf/cmecf.html Official U.S. Courts CM/ECF Website]
* [http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/ PACER CM/ECF Information Page]
* [http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/training.html Training and Tutorials for CM/ECF]
* [http://www.bestcase.com/ecfresource.htm ECF Resources for Bankruptcy Attys]