- Al-Mu'addal
Al-Mu'addal was the
Saffarid ruler ofZarang for a part of911 .In
890 al-Mu'addal and his brother al-Laith helped their father 'Ali escape from imprisonment at the hands of the latter's uncle, the Saffarid amirAmr bin Laith . The three of them fled toKhurasan , where they entered the services ofRafi' b. Harthama . After 'Ali died in893 , the brothers continued to serve Rafi'. In896 they were captured by 'Amr, who however treated them well.Near the end of
908 al-Laith made a bid for power against 'Amr's son and successor Tahir by occupying part ofZarang . Al-Mu'addal, who had been taken hostage by Tahir, was released in early909 after Tahir was unable to dislodge al-Laith in an attempt to induce the latter to give up his struggle. Al-Laith maintained his position, however, and Tahir was eventually forced to withdraw.Al-Laith was now amir, but many were opposed to him. In the east, supporters of Tahir were causing unrest in
Zabulistan , while in the west, the Turkish generalSebük-eri had transferred his allegiance from the Saffarids to thecaliph , resulting in the loss ofFars andKerman . Al-Mu'addal was sent to restore order to the Zabulistan; while doing so he managed to capture a brother of Sebük-eri's named Ghalib. He then moved on toGhazna and killed a local leader there, but soon encountered stiff resistance and al-Laith was required to send him reinforcements. Despite this, he returned toSistan near the end of 909 having established the authority of al-Laith in the eastern provinces.In
910 al-Mu'addal participated in al-Laith's campaign against Sebük-eri; once they entered Fars he was charged with capturing the road toKhuzestan . Sebük-eri soon after managed to defeat and capture al-Laith, however, and al-Mu'addal was forced to flee to Kerman, where he took control of the local treasury before moving on to Sistan. In Zarang, meanwhile, news of al-Laith's fall caused the people to recognize another brother, Muhammad, as amir. In an effort to cement his power, Muhammad imprisoned al-Mu'addal.Muhammad was subsequently forced to conduct a campaign against the
Samanids to the north. After suffering a setback and being forced to end the campaign, his advisors convinced him that he needed al-Mu'addal's support, so he set him free. Al-Mu'addal, however, seized Zarang, forcing Muhammad to go toBust instead.Soon afterwards the Samanid Ahmad sent an army to take Zarang from the Saffarids. The Samanids arrived before the city in March of
911 and initiated a siege. During the siege al-Mu'addal was informed of Ahmad's taking of Bust and his capture of Muhammad. This prompted him to negotiate with the Samanids, and at the end of July 911 he surrendered. Al-Mu'addal's fate was better than that of his predecessors', who had been imprisoned in Baghdad; he was sent by Ahmad toBukhara and given a monthl stipend. His surrender allowed the Samanids to take control of Sistan.References
*Bosworth, C.E. "The History of the Saffarids of Sistan and the Maliks of Nimruz (247/861 to 949/1542-3)". Costa Mesa, California: Mazda Publishers, 1994.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.