- Anna Diggs Taylor
Anna Diggs Taylor (born Anna Katherine Johnston, 1932,
Washington, D.C. ) is a is a United States District Judge for theUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan . She graduated fromBarnard College in 1954 andYale Law School in 1957, and worked in the Office of Solicitor for theUnited States Department of Labor . In 1979, she was appointed to the federal bench by PresidentJimmy Carter , becoming the first black woman judge appointed to that Eastern District of Michigan.She became Chief Judge of the court in 1997, and took senior status in 1998. [ [http://www.micourthistory.org/resources/women-and-law/taylor.php Michigan Supreme Court Historical Society biography] ]
In 1960, she married U.S. Representative
Charles Diggs ; they divorced in 1971. She marriedS. Martin Taylor , a regent of theUniversity of Michigan , in 1976.Anonymous reviews published in the
Almanac of the Federal Judiciary highlight a positive reputation among lawyers who have appeared before her, as well as positive comments about her legal ability. However, the quality and comprehensiveness of her 2006 "ACLU v. NSA" ruling has been criticized by some legal experts.cite news|title=Experts Fault Reasoning in Surveillance Decision|author=Adam Liptak|date=2006-08-19|publisher=The New York Times |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/19/washington/19ruling.html]"ACLU v. NSA"
In 2006, Judge Taylor was the first U.S. judge to rule on the legal and
constitutional issues of theNSA warrantless surveillance controversy . Her ruling, "ACLU v. NSA ", held that the domestic wiretapping conducted by theNational Security Agency without court approval violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and is unconstitutional. She granted a permanentinjunction to halt it. The ruling, whose effect is stayed pending appellate proceedings, [cite web | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100401731.html | title= Court Allows Warrantless Wiretapping During Appeal | accessmonthday = October 6 | accessyear = 2006 | author = Associated Press | date = 2006-10-05 ] sparked a vigorous political and legalcontroversy . In the same decision, she declined to rule on the legality of the allegedNSA call database , on States Secrets grounds.The watchdog organization
Judicial Watch has alleged that Taylor may have had aconflict of interest in this case, because according toJudicial Watch she is or wassecretary andtrustee for the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan (CFSEM), a group that made a recent grant of $45,000 over two years to theACLU of Michigan, the winning plaintiff in "ACLU v. NSA". [cite news|title=Judicial Watch press release|author=|date=2006-08-21|publisher=|url=http://www.judicialwatch.org/5862.shtml]Taylor's ruling was subsequently overturned by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. The Circuit Court ruled 2-1 that the people bringing the suit did not have standing. The Court's decision vacated the portion of Taylor's ruling concerning warrantless wiretaps.
Footnotes
References
* [http://www.daahp.wayne.edu/biographiesDisplay.asp?id=64 Biography at Detroit African-American History Project]
External links
* [http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060823/NEWS05/608230436/1007/NEWS Judge in wiretap case under fire]
* [http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/lib_hist/Courts/district%20court/MI/EDMI/judges/adt-bio.html History of the Sixth Circuit] Biography
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.