R. v. Turpin

SCCInfoBox
case-name=R. v. Turpin
full-case-name=Sharon Turpin and Latif Siddiqui v. Her Majesty The Queen
citations= [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1296
heard-date=June 16, 1988
decided-date=May 4, 1989
history=
ruling=Accused appeal dimissed
ratio=
SCC=1988-1988
NotParticipating=Le Dain, McIntyre and Sopinka JJ.
Unanimous=Wilson J.

"R. v. Turpin", [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1296 is a leading constitutional case of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that the requirement for a murder trial to be conducted in front of a judge and jury did not violate the right to trial by jury under sections 11(f) or the equality guarantee under section 15 of the "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms".

Background

Sharon Turpin and Latif Siddiqui were tried for first degree murder in Ontario. As with all murder trials, they must be tried in front of a judge and jury according to ss. 427, 429 and 430 of the "Criminal Code of Canada". The Turpin and Siddiqui challenged the constitutionality of the provisions on two grounds. First, they claimed that section 11(f) of the "Charter" granted them a right to choose between judge alone or judge and jury, which was violated by the Code provisions. Second, they argued that since there is an exception to the Code provisions for trials in Alberta, there was a violation of their right to equality under section 15 of the "Charter".

At trial, the judge found that the provisions were unconstitutional for violating both sections. On appeal, the ruling was overturned.

Opinion of the Court

Justice Wilson, writing for the Court, dismissed the appeal and found that there was no violation. She found that section 11(f) did not protect selection of mode of trial, nor did it protect the right to trial by judge alone. On the equality issue she found that persons living outside of Alberta did not constitute a "disadvantaged group" as required in a successful claim.

External links

*

References