- Scops-owl
Taxobox
name = Scops-owls
image_caption =Eurasian Scops-owl s, "Otus scops"
regnum =Animalia
phylum =Chordata
classis =Aves
subclassis =Neornithes
infraclassis =Neognathae
superordo =Neoaves
ordo =Strigiformes
familia =Strigidae
genus = "Otus"
genus_authority = Pennant, 1769
subdivision_ranks =Species
subdivision = Around 45, see text
synonyms =Genus:
*"Scops" Savigny, 1809
("non" Moehring, 1758, Brünnich, 1772: preoccupied)
*"Scopus" Oken 1817 ("non" Brisson, 1760: preoccupied)Scops-owls are
Strigidae (typicalowl s) belong to thegenus "Otus". Approximately 45 livingspecies are known, but new ones are frequently recognized and unknown ones are still being discovered every few years or so, especially inIndonesia . For most of the 20th century, this genus included the Americanscreech-owl s which are now again separated in "Megascops " based on a range ofbehavior al,biogeographical , morphological andDNA sequence data.Scops-owls in the modern sense are restricted to the
Old World , except for a singleNorth America n species - theFlammulated Owl - that is only provisionally placed here and is likely to be moved out of "Otus" eventually. See below for details.As usual for owls, female scops-owls are usually larger than the males of their species, with owls of both genders being compact in size and shape. All of the birds in this genus are small and agile. Scops-owls are colored in various brownish hues, sometimes with a lighter underside and/or face, which helps to camouflage them against the bark of trees. Some are polymorphic, occurring in a greyish- and a reddish-brown morph.
Ecology and behaviour
Scops-owls hunt from perches in semi-open landscapes. They prefer areas which contain old trees with hollows; these are home to their prey which includes
insects ,reptiles , smallmammals such as bats and mice and other small birds. The owls will also eat earthworms,amphibians and aquatic invertebrates [Marchesi & Sergio (2005)] . Scops-owls have a good sense of hearing which helps them locate their prey in any habitat. They also possess well-developed raptorial claws and a curved bill, both of which are used for tearing their prey into pieces small enough to swallow easily.Scops-owls are primarily solitary birds. Most species lay and incubate their eggs in a cavity nest which was previously made by another animal. During the incubation period, the male will feed the female. These birds are
monogamous , with biparental care, and onlyfledge one young per year. The young of most scops-owls are altricial to semialtricial.As opposed to screech-owls, scops-owls have only a single type of call. This consists of a series of whistles or high-pitched hoots, given with a frequency of 4 calls per second or less, or of a single, drawn-out whistle. Calls differ widely between species in type and pitch, and in the field are often the first indication of these birds' presence, as well as the most reliable means to distinguish between species. Some, like the recently-described
Serendib Scops-owl ("Otus thilohoffmanni"), were discovered because their vocalizations were unfamiliar to experts in bird-calls.Taxonomy and systematics
Due to a nomenclatorial dispute, the
generic name "Scops" is not used by either the scops- or the screech-owls (which when only a few species were known were placed together), nor by any other animal. In 1760,Mathurin Jacques Brisson had established the genus "Scopus" for thehammerkop , a peculiarAfrica n bird.Paul Möhring in 1758 had already used the name "Scops" for this bird however, and believing this name to be validMorten Thrane Brünnich replaced "Scopus" with it in 1772. The scops- and screech-owls, which were placed in "Otus" byThomas Pennant in 1769 (as he too believed that Moehring's "Scops" was valid) were moved to "Scops" byMarie Jules César Savigny in 1809.Lorenz Oken in 1817 changed this to "Scopus", also under the impression that "Scops" was the older name for the hammerkop, and valid. [uBio (2005)]However, the names established by Moehring predate the official start date of Linnean nomenclature in zoology as regulated by the
ICZN , which is December 31, 1758 - the last day of the year in which the 10th edition of Linné's "Systema Naturae " was published. Hence, "Scopus" as established by Brisson is indeed the valid generic name of the hammerkop, and the first valid use of "Scops" was in 1772 by Brünnich - which according to modern rules of zoological nomenclature was unjustified however, as the name he believed to be reinstating had never been technically valid in the first place.Evolution
The
evolution ary relationships of the scops- and screech-owls are not entirely clear. What is certain is that they are very closely related; they may be considered sister lineages which fill essentially the sameecological niche in theirallopatric ranges. A screech-owlfossil from theLate Pliocene ofKansas [SpecimenUMMP 50982, a partial leftcoracoid fromFox Canyon : Ford (1966).] - which is almost identical to Eastern andWestern Screech-owl s - indicate a long-standing presence of these birds in theAmericas , whilecoeval scops-owl fossils very similar to theEurasian Scops-owl have been found atS'Onix on the Spanish islandMajorca Mlíkovský (2002)] . The scops-and-screech-owl lineage probably evolved at some time during theMiocene (like most other genera of typical owls), and the three (see below) modern lineages separated perhaps roughly 5 million years ago. Note that there is no reliable estimate of divergence time, as "Otus" and "Megascops" areosteological ly very similar, as is to be expected from a group that has apparently conserved itsecomorphology since before itsevolutionary radiation . As almost all scops- and screech-owls today, their common ancestor was in all probability already a small owl, with ear tufts and at least the uppertarsus ("leg") feathered.However that may be, the hypothesis that the group evolved from Old World stock [Johnson (2003)] is tentatively supported by cytochrome "b" sequence dataHeidrich "et al." (1995), Wink & Heidrich (1999)] .
The splitting of "Otus sensu lato"
While late 19th-century
ornithologist s knew little of the variation of these cryptic birds which often live in far-off places, with every newtaxon being described a few differences between the Old and New World "scops" owls became more and more prominent. Namely, the scops-owls give a whistling call or a row of high-pitched hoots with less than four individual hoots per second. This call is given in social interaction or when the owl tries to scare away other animals. The screech-owls on the other hand are named for their piercing trills of more than four individual notes per second. They also have a kind of song, which is a short sequence of varying calls given by the males when they try to attract females to their nests, or between members of a pair. There are a few other differences such as the screech-owls almost never being brown below which is common in scops-owls, but the difference in vocalizations is most striking.By the mid-19th century, it was becoming clear that "Otus" encompassed more than one genus. First, in 1848, the screech-owls were split off as "Megascops". The
white-faced owl s of Africa, with their huge eyes and striking facial coloration, were separated in "Ptilopsis" in 1851. In 1854, the highlyapomorph icWhite-throated Screech-owl of theAndes was placed in themonotypic genus "Macabra". "Gymnasio" was established in the same year for thePuerto Rican Screech Owl , and theBare-legged Owl (or "Cuban Screech-owl") was separated in "Gymnoglaux" the following year; the latter genus was sometimes merged with "Gymnasio" by subsequent authors. ThePalau Owl , described only in 1872 and little-known to this day, was eventually separated in "Pyrroglaux" byYoshimaro Yamashina in 1938.In the early 20th century, the lumping-together of
taxa had come to be preferred. The 3rd edition of the AOU checklist in 1910 placed the screech-owls back in "Otus". Although this move was never unequivocally accepted, it was the dominant treatment throughout most of the 20th century. In 1988 it was attempted to resolve this by reestablishing all those genera split some 140 years earlier atsubgenus rank inside "Otus" [Marshall & King (1988)] . Still, the diversity and distinctness of the group failed to come together in a goodevolution ary andphylogenetic picture, and it was not until the availability ofDNA sequence data that this could be resolved. In 1999, a preliminary study ofmtDNA cytochrome "b" across a wide range of owls found that even the treatment as subgenera was probably unsustainable and suggested that most of the genera proposed around 1850 should be accepted. Though there was some debate about the reliability of these findings at firstSACC (2003)] , they have been confirmed by subsequent studies. In 2003, the AOU formally reaccepted the genus "Megascops" again [Banks "et al." (2003)] .The
Flammulated Owl has been found to be marginally closer to the screech-owls than to the scops-owls, but by no means robustly or reliably so. If the scops-and-screech-owlclade indeed originated in the Old World, the Flammulated Owl's ancestors either colonized the Americas independently from but at about the same time and from much the same stock as the screech-owls', or they diverged immediately after the latter had settled in the New World. In any case, "Otus" flammeolus" might warrant separation in its ownmonotypic genus as this would best agree with the available data. It is retained in "Otus" simply because it does not have the "song" or rapid trill of "Megascops" - which as seen above are highly informative as regards these owls'phylogeny .pecies
*
White-fronted Scops-owl , " Otus sagittatus"
*Andaman Scops-owl , " Otus balli"Verify source|date=January 2008
*Reddish Scops-owl , " Otus rufescens"
** Sulu Reddish Scops-owl, "Otus rufescens burbidgei" - doubtfully distinct,extinct (mid-20th century)
*Sandy Scops-owl , " Otus icterorhynchus"
*Sokoke Scops-owl , " Otus ireneae"
*Flores Scops-owl , " Otus alfredi"
*Mountain Scops-owl , " Otus spilocephalus"
*Rajah Scops-owl , " Otus brookii"
*Javan Scops-owl , " Otus angelinae"
*Mentawai Scops-owl , " Otus mentawi"
*Collared Scops-owl , " Otus bakkamoena"
*Indian Scops-owl , " Otus lettia"
*Sunda Scops-owl , " Otus lempiji"
*Japanese Scops-owl , " Otus semitorques"
*Wallace's Scops-owl , " Otus silvicola"Verify source|date=January 2008
*Palawan Scops-owl , " Otus fuliginosus"
*Philippine Scops-owl , " Otus megalotis"
*Mindanao Scops-owl , " Otus mirus"
*Luzon Scops-owl , " Otus longicornis"
*Mindoro Scops-owl , " Otus mindorensis"
*Pallid Scops-owl , " Otus brucei"
*African Scops-owl , " Otus senegalensis"
*Eurasian Scops-owl , " Otus scops"
*Oriental Scops-owl , " Otus sunia"
*Moluccan Scops-owl , " Otus magicus"
*Mantanani Scops-owl , " Otus mantananensis"
*Ryūkyū Scops-owl , " Otus elegans"
*Sulawesi Scops-owl , " Otus manadensis"
*Sangihe Scops-owl , " Otus collari"
*Biak Scops-owl , " Otus beccarii"
*Seychelles Scops-owl , " Otus insularis"
*Simeulue Scops-owl , " Otus umbra"
*Enggano Scops-owl , " Otus enganensis"
*Nicobar Scops-owl , " Otus alius"
*Pemba Scops-owl , " Otus pembaensis"
*Comoro Scops-owl , " Otus pauliani"
*Siau Scops-owl , "Otus siaoensis"Verify source|date=January 2008
*Anjouan Scops-owl , " Otus capnodes"
*Moheli Scops-owl , " Otus moheliensis"
*Malagasy Scops-owl , " Otus rutilus"
*Mayotte Scops-owl , " Otus mayottensis" – formerly included in "O. rutilus"
*Torotoroka Scops-owl , " Otus madagascariensis" – formerly included in "O. rutilus"
*Serendib Scops-owl , "Otus thilohoffmanni"Verify source|date=January 2008
*Sao Tome Scops-owl , " Otus hartlaubi"
*Flammulated Owl , " Otus flammeolus" – provisionally placed here
*Balsas Screech Owl , "Otus seductus"As noted above, the
fossil record of scops-owls gives an incomplete picture of their evolution at present. While older sources cite many species of supposedextinct "Otus" (or "Scops"), these are now placed in entirely different genera:
* "Otus" henrici" was abarn-owl of the genus "Selenornis "
* "Otus" providentiae" was aburrowing owl , probably apaleosubspecies
* "Otus" wintershofensis" may be close to extant genus "Ninox " and some material assigned to it belongs into "Intutula "
* "Scops" commersoni" is ajunior synonym of the recently-extinctMauritius Owl , referring to pictures and descriptions which mention ear tufts; thesubfossil material of this species had been erroneously assigned to tuftless owlsFootnotes
References
* (2003): Forty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union check-list of North American birds. "Auk" 120(3): 923–931. [http://www.aou.org/checklist/suppl/AOU_checklist_suppl_44.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (1966): Fossil Owls From the Rexroad Fauna of the Upper Pliocene in Kansas. "Condor" 68(5): 472-475. doi|10.2307/1365319 [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v068n05/p0472-p0475.pdf PDF fulltext] [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/DJVU/v068n05/P0472-P0475.djvu DjVu fulltext]
* (1995): Molecular phylogeny of the South American "Otus atricapillus" complex (Aves Strigidae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. "Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C" 50(3-4): 294-302. [http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak14/ipmb/phazb/pubwink/1995/6.%201995.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2003): The owl pages: [http://www.owlpages.com/articles.php?section=Studies+and+Papers&title=Fossils Owls in the Fossil Record] . Version of 2003-JUL-14. Retrieved 2008-JAN-10.
* (2005): Distribution, density, diet and productivity of the Scops Owl "Otus scops" in the Italian Alps. "Ibis" 147(1): 176-187. doi|10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00388.x (HTML abstract)
* (1988): Genus "Otus". "In:" aut|Amadon, Dean & Bull, J: Hawks and owls of the world: A distributional and taxonomic list. "Proceedings of the Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology" 3: 296–357.
* (2002): "Cenozoic Birds of the World, Part 1: Europe". Ninox Press, Prague. ISBN 80-901105-3-8 [http://www.nm.cz/download/JML-18-2002-CBE.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2003): [http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCProp58.html Proposal (#58): Elevate subgenus "Megascops" (New World "Otus") to full generic status] . Retrieved 2008-JAN-10.
* (2005): "Digital Nomenclator Zoologicus", version 0.86 4: 153. [http://www.ubio.org/NZ/PDF/Vol4/pg0153.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (1999): Molecular evolution and systematics of owls (Strigiformes). "In:" aut|König, Claus; Weick, F. & Becking, J.H. (eds.): "Owls: A guide to the owls of the world": 39-57. Yale University Press, New Haven. ISBN 0300079206 [http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak14/ipmb/phazb/pubwink/1999/20.%201999.pdf PDF fulltext]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.