- 2003 term United States Supreme Court opinions of William Rehnquist
Concurrence
width=25px
Concurrence/dissent
white-space: nowrap |Total =
16
-
colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 14
colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 1
colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 1
-
white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 2
colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: O'Connor (11)
colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Stevens (5)
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens and Kennedy filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Campaign finance reform
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter; Stevens, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist filed one of three opinions for the Court.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Campaign finance reform
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Kennedy
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist also filed one of two opinions dissenting in part.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Establishment Clause: public funding
width=20% valign=top | Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist wrote for a 7-2 majority that upheld a state scholarship program that excluded only theology students from consideration. Scalia and Thomas filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Confrontation Clause: hearsay
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed a dissent.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Bankruptcy; state sovereignty
width=20% valign=top | Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas filed a dissent.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | State sovereignty; Americans with Disabilities Act
width=20% valign=top | Kennedy, Thomas
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist filed one of two dissents from Stevens' 5-4 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer; O'Connor (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Electoral redistricting
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Thomas
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist dissented from the Court's denial of "certiorari", arguing that the Court should review the Colorado Supreme Court's interpretation of the Federal Elections Clause in the U.S. Constitution that it was up to each state to decide for itself what "Legislature" meant in the context of what branch of government was empowered to redraw legislative districts.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Article III standing; Establishment Clause
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor; Thomas (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist filed one of three dissents from O'Connor's 6-3 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed a dissent.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Campaign finance reform
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Rehnquist denied a request for an injunction pending appeal.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.