- 2004 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens
Concurrence
width=25px
Concurrence/dissent
white-space: nowrap |Total =
32
-
colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 29
colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 2
colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 1
-
white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 0
colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Ginsburg (16)
colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Rehnquist, Thomas (2)
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens dissented from the Court's "per curiam" decision that ruled that a police officer who shot a suspect fleeing in an automobile was entitled to qualified immunity. Stevens argued that the officer's conduct was objectively unreasonable because deadly force should not have been used to prevent the suspect's escape. He also believed that the immunity issue should have been decided by a jury, and that the Court should have held full briefing and argument on the case.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Right to a jury trial: determination of federal sentencing factors by judge
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of two opinions for the Court, each resolving different parts of the case; the other was filed by Breyer.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Right to a jury trial: determination of federal sentencing factors by judge
width=20% valign=top | Souter; Scalia (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of three dissents from Breyer's opinion for the Court in part.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Souter and Ginsburg filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Death penalty: execution of minors
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Voter intimidation
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens denied a stay.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens concurred in the Court's denial of "certiorari".
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens was the lone dissenter from Ginsburg's 8-1 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | O'Connor
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of two dissents from Kennedy's 5-4 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg; Souter (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens wrote an opinion respecting the Court's denial of "certiorari" to emphasize that the decision not to review the lower court's decision was not a judgment on the merits.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Commerce Clause: prohibition of state-sanctioned intrastate production of medical marijuana
width=20% valign=top | Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | O'Connor and Thomas filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas filed a dissent.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of two dissents from O'Connor's 5-4 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Eminent domain
width=20% valign=top | Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | O'Connor and Thomas filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Souter
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens dissented from Scalia's 7-2 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of two dissents from Kennedy's 5-4 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Establishment Clause
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens filed one of three dissents from Rehnquist's plurality decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Due process right to enforce restraining order
width=20% valign=top | Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Telecommunications
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.