2001 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

2001 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The table below lists the opinions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of the United States during the 2001 Term, which lasted from October 1, 2001, until October 6, 2002. The table illustrates what opinions were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each opinion. [One decree the Court had included in its list of bench opinions for the term has been omitted: "Nebraska v. Wyoming", 534 U.S. 40 (2001), a "per curiam" decree approving the parties' settlement.]

Table key

2001 term opinions

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="red" |
-
"Dusenbery v. United States", 534 U.S. 161
October 29, 2001
January 8, 2002
bgcolor="#00CD00" |

bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="red" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
-
"Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams", 534 U.S. 184
November 7, 2001
January 8, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson", 534 U.S. 204
October 1, 2001
January 8, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
||
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker", 535 U.S. 125
February 19, 2002
March 26, 2002
bgcolor="#00CD00" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="white" |
-
"Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB", 535 U.S. 137
January 15, 2002
March 27, 2002
bgcolor="#00CD00" |

bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="red" |
-
"Mickens v. Taylor", 535 U.S. 162
November 5, 2001
March 27, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="red" align=center|1 |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
-
"Adams v. Florida Power Corp.", [The Court in "Adams" dismissed "certiorari" as improvidently granted.] 535 U.S. 228

April 1, 2001
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Sao Paulo State of Federative Republic of Brazil v. American Tobacco Co.", 535 U.S. 229

April 1, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition", 535 U.S. 234
October 30, 2001
April 16, 2002|
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Thompson v. Western States Medical Center", 535 U.S. 357
February 26, 2002
April 29, 2002
bgcolor="#EE9572" |

bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="red" align=center|1
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="red" align=center|2
bgcolor="#EE9572" align=center|1
bgcolor="#EE9572" align=center|2
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
-
"Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.", 535 U.S. 425
December 4, 2001
May 13, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" align=center|* |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00B2EE" align=center|2
bgcolor="#79CDCD" align=center|2
bgcolor="#00CD00" align=center|*
bgcolor="#79CDCD" align=center|2 |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" align=center|2
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" align=center|2
bgcolor="red" align=center|2
-
"Gisbrecht v. Barnhart", 535 U.S. 789
March 20, 2002
May 28, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="red" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"SEC v. Zandford", 535 U.S. 813
March 18, 2002
June 3, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc."535 U. S. 826
March 19, 2002
June 3, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
||
-
"Franconia Associates v. United States", 536 U.S. 129
April 15, 2002
June 10, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc. of N. Y., Inc. v. Village of Stratton", 536 U.S. 150
February 26, 2002
June 17, 2002
bgcolor="red" |

bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00B2EE" align=center|1
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
-
"Barnes v. Gorman", 536 U.S. 181
April 23, 2002
June 17, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#00B2EE" align=center|1 |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="red" align=center|1
bgcolor="#CC99CC" align=center|2
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#B23AEE" align=center|2
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" |
-
"BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB", 536 U.S. 516
April 16, 2002
June 24, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#79CDCD" align=center|2
bgcolor="#00CD00" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#00CD00" align=center|*
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="red" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" | |
-
"Hope v. Pelzer", 536 U.S. 730
April 17, 2002
June 27, 2002
bgcolor="#EE9572" |

bgcolor="#00CD00" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#EE9572" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="red" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"Republican Party of Minnesota v. White", 536 U.S. 765
March 26, 2002
June 27, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
||
-
"Bd. of Ed. of Pottawatomie v. Earls", 536 U.S. 822

June 27, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#EE9572" align=center|2 |

-
"Stewart v. Smith", 536 U.S. 856

June 28, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
-
"United States v. Bass", 536 U.S. 862

June 28, 2002
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |
bgcolor="#93DB70" |

2001 term membership and statistics

This was the sixteenth term of Chief Justice Rehnquist's tenure, and the eighth consecutive term in which the Court's membership had not changed.
-
Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
Ronald Reagan
align=right|September 25, 1981
align=center|87.3% |
-
Associate Justice David Souter
George H. W. Bush
align=right|October 9, 1990
align=center|77.4% |
-
Associate Justice Stephen Breyer
Bill Clinton
align=right|August 3, 1994
align=center|79.5% |
-
colspan=5 bgcolor=#EEEEEE |Notes on statistics:
*A justice is only included in the majority if they joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full.
*Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
*The opinion counts only include the bench opinions listed above; opinions relating to orders and in-chambers opinions are not included.

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Supreme Court of the United States — Infobox High Court|court name = Supreme Court of the United States imagesize = 150px caption = established = 1789 country = United States location = Washington, D.C. coordinates= coord|38|53|26.55|N|77|00|15.64|W|display=inline,title type =… …   Wikipedia

  • 2000 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States — The table below lists the opinions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of the United States during the 2000 Term, which lasted from October 2, 2000, until September 30, 2001. The table illustrates what opinions were filed by each… …   Wikipedia

  • Liberalism in the United States — is a broad political and philosophical mindset, favoring individual liberty, and opposing restrictions on liberty, whether they come from established religion, from government regulation, or from the existing class structure. [ Liberalism in… …   Wikipedia

  • Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States — United States This article is part of the series on the  United States Supreme Court The Court …   Wikipedia

  • Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States — United States This article is part of the series on the  United States Supreme Court The Court …   Wikipedia

  • Copyright law of the United States — The copyright law of the United States governs the legally enforceable rights of creative and artistic works under the laws of the United States. Copyright law in the United States is part of federal law, and is authorized by the U.S.… …   Wikipedia

  • History of religion in the United States — The religious history of the United States begins more than a century before the former British colonies became the United States of America in 1776.Some of the original settlers were men and women of deep religious convictions. The religious… …   Wikipedia

  • Separation of church and state in the United States — The phrase separation of church and state (sometimes wall of separation between church and state ), attributed to Thomas Jefferson and others, and since quoted by the Supreme Court of the United States, expresses an understanding of the intent… …   Wikipedia

  • presidency of the United States of America — ▪ United States government Introduction  chief executive office of the United States. In contrast to many countries with parliamentary forms of government, where the office of president, or head of state, is mainly ceremonial, in the United… …   Universalium

  • Sex-related court cases in the United States — The United States Supreme Court and various U.S. state courts have decided several cases regarding pornography, sexual activity, and reproductive rights. The trend has been one of courts striking down states attempts to regulate sex.The following …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”