Haunted Castle at Six Flags Great Adventure

"For other uses, see Haunted Castle (disambiguation)."

The Haunted Castle at Six Flags Great Adventure was a haunted house attraction at Six Flags Great Adventure amusement park in Jackson Township, New Jersey. On May 11, 1984, eight teenage visitors were trapped and killed when the structure was destroyed by fire.

Six Flags Great Adventure and its parent company Six Flags were subsequently indicted for aggravated manslaughter, accused of recklessly causing the deaths by taking inadequate precautions against a fire. In the subsequent trial, the prosecution argued that repeated warnings by safety consultants to install sprinklers or smoke alarms had been ignored. The defendants denied any culpability, and contended that the fire was arson and that no precautions would have saved lives. The trial jury found the defendants not guilty.

Operation

The purpose of the Haunted Castle walk-through dark ride was to entertain its customers by frightening them. Exterior decorations included plastic monsters, skulls and other features meant to create a frightening atmosphere. A facade of false turrets and towers lent the illusion of height to the one-story structure, completing the look of a forbidding medieval castle. After crossing a drawbridge over the surrounding moat, visitors entered the castle and felt their way along a convert|450|ft|m|sing=on-long convoluted path of dim corridors, occasionally being startled when employee actors dressed as Dracula, Frankenstein and other creatures jumped from hiding. Various theatrical props and exhibits were in view, including coffins, ghoulish mannequins, hanging spider webs and skeletons. Strobe lights and eerie sounds completed the scene.cite news
url = http://www.hauntedattraction.com/33/industry.html#ind2
title = Fire at the Haunted Castle (excerpted from "Amusement Park Crisis Management")
publisher = Haunted Attraction Magazine
accessdate = 2006-11-18
author = Joe Costal ]

Construction and history

Originally constructed of four aluminum highway trailers when it opened in 1978, the castle was expanded to 17 interconnected trailers in 1979.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70B13F93B5D0C728EDDAF0894DD484D81
title = GREAT ADVENTURE'S SISTER PARK INSTALLED SPRINKLERS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-21
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ] The castle was actually two side-by-side attractions of the same kind, with separate corridors and a common control room in the center. Only one side, with 9 of the 17 trailers, was in use at the time of the fire.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00F12FF3F5D0C728CDDAF0894DD484D81
title = SPRINKLERS NOT SOUGHT, ATTRACTION BUILDER SAYS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-01
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ]

During the subsequent criminal trial, the Jackson Township fire inspector testified that he had never inspected the castle.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F20F15F7395D0C758DDDAE0894DD484D81
title = FUN HOUSE NEVER INSPECTED, TOWN FIRE INSPECTOR TESTIFIES
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-07-16
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ] The township considered the castle a "temporary structure," even after it had been at the park for five years, based on the fact that the trailers were on wheels.The castle lacked a building permit or certificate of occupancy, and had no sprinklers or alarms despite repeated recommendations for them by the park's own safety consultants.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FA0917F73C5C0C708DDDAE0894DD484D81
title = FIRE SAFETY WAS WEAK AT 6 FLAGS, EXPERT SAYS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-13
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ]

Materials

The castle's aluminum trailers were linked by plywood partitions to create a complex maze. Attached to its exterior were painted turrets and towers of plywood on wooden frames. Inside, the materials used included foam rubber, various fabrics and plastics, plywood and
tar paper. Wax mannequins were used as props.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70E10FE3B5D0C7B8DDDAF0894DD484D81
title = OFFICIAL RECALLS CODE VIOLATIONS AT THEME PARK
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-16
accessdate = 2006-11-21 ] cite news
url =http://www.mass.gov/dfs/osfm/fireprevention/adv/av_hauntedh.htm
title = State Fire Marshall's Advisory
publisher = Massachusetts Department of Fire Services
date = 1999-06-03
accessdate = 2006-07-29 ] ]

The fire

The fire started at 6:35 p.m. on a Friday evening. Fanned by outside air conditioners that continued to push air up through the floor vents, it spread rapidly due to the use of flammable building materials.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F6071FF6355C0C708DDDAC0894DC484D81
title = CAUSE SOUGHT IN BLAZE FATAL TO 8 AT JERSEY PARK'S HAUNTED CASTLE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-13
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] About 29 people were in the attraction when the fire started. Fourteen, including four park employees, escaped. Seven were treated for smoke inhalation at an area hospital. Eight teenagers from one group of nine that entered together were trapped and killed by asphyxiation.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F50B16FD3D5F0C7A8DDDAC0894DC484D81
title = BLAZE FATAL TO 8 LINKED TO LIGHTER
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-19
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] The sole survivor of the group was carried to safety by a park employee. cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F40613FF3E5D0C758CDDAF0894DD484D81
title = WORKER AT GREAT ADVENTURE CITES DELAY IN REPORTING FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-06
accessdate = 2006-12-19 ]

One witness, whose group entered the attraction three to five minutes behind the victim group, later testified that when she reached a display called the Hunchback, she saw flames coming from around a bend beyond the display. She thought it was part of the show, but then smelled smoke and realized the flames were real. Her group started yelling "fire!" and ran back to the entrance, bumping into walls.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F30C1EF7395D0C708DDDAF0894DD484D81
title = GIRL TELLS COURT ABOUT ESCAPING FUN HOUSE FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-13
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ]

Firefighters from 11 surrounding communities responded, and the fire was declared under control at 7:45 p.m. The park remained open during the fire, and closed at 8 p.m., two hours early.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FA0E12F9355C0C718DDDAC0894DC484D81
title = 8 PEOPLE KILLED, 7 HURT IN BLAZE AT THEME PARK
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-12
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] No one realized that lives had been lost until later that night, when firefighters searching one of the burnt-out trailers discovered the bodies, thought at first to be mannequins.

The investigation

The fire spotlighted a complex collection of local, state and Federal laws. New Jersey's Department of Labor and Industries inspects the safety of rides, such as roller coasters and ferris wheels. Locally, municipalities enforce state and local building codes governing fire safety and electrical wiring. In turn, the state's Department of Community Affairs is responsible for ensuring that municipalities enforce the codes. Finally, the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for monitoring employee safety. A state panel investigating the fire said that the regulatory system had failed at almost every level; and that the Haunted Castle had been in violation of a dozen state fire codes.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FB0C10FC3D5F0C7A8DDDAC0894DC484D81
title = PARK-FIRE INQUIRY FINDS THE SYSTEM FELL SHORT
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-19
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ] cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F60A1EFF3E5F0C748EDDA00894DC484D81
title = REPORT IN JERSEY FINDS PARK FIRE WAS AVOIDABLE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-09-27
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ]

The panel said the state's Uniform Construction Code [ [http://www.state.nj.us/dca/codes/forms/pdf/summary_of_ucc.pdf New Jersey Uniform Construction Code, 3-page summary PDF] ] required the owners to install smoke detectors and several other common safety devices before the castle opened. A spokesman for the local volunteer fire department said it had not enforced the state requirement for smoke detectors because the township's building inspector said that the code did not apply because the castle was a temporary structure.

Eight days after the fire, a statement by the Ocean County Prosecutor's Office said a 13-year-old boy had called the police after hearing radio reports that investigators were looking for witnesses. The boy told the police that he had been befriended by a 14-year-old boy at the castle's entrance. He said the older youth, who appeared to be familiar with the castle, offered to guide him through. He said the older youth used a cigarette lighter to find his way down a long corridor that was dark because of a malfunctioning strobe light, and eventually bumped into and ignited a foam-rubber wall pad. The prosecutor exonerated the older youth, who has never been identified, of any criminal wrongdoing.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F50B16FD3D5F0C7A8DDDAC0894DC484D81
title = BLAZE FATAL TO 8 LINKED TO LIGHTER
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-19
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ]

Legal aftermath

On September 14, 1984 a grand jury in Toms River, New Jersey, indicted Six Flags Great Adventure and its parent company Six Flags on a charge of aggravated manslaughter, for "recklessly causing the deaths under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life." The indictment also charged two park executives, the general manager at the time of the fire and his predecessor, with manslaughter for reckless conduct in ignoring repeated warnings of safety violations.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FB0F11FB395F0C748DDDAC0894DD484D81
title = AMUSEMENT PARK OWNERS GO ON TRIAL FOR FIRE THAT KILLED 8
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-05-17
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ]

Criminal trial

The criminal trial began in New Jersey Superior Court in Toms River on May 29, 1985. The prosecution argued that repeated warnings by safety consultants to install sprinklers or smoke alarms had been ignored. The defendants denied any culpability, and contended that the fire was arson and that no precautions would have saved lives.

Prosecution case

The prosecution called as witnesses fire-prevention consultants who had inspected the castle and recommended the installation of sprinklers or smoke alarms; and told the trial jury that after five years of semiannual inspections, the devices were not in place when the attraction burned.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FB0A15F9395D0C718DDDAF0894DD484D81
title = PARK FIRE AN ACCIDENT, BOY TESTIFIES
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-12
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ] Shift managers of the attraction called as witnesses testified that "none of the exit lights were working, bulbs were missing from other lights and there were no fire alarms, despite a history of patrons' using matches and cigarette lighters in the dark corridors"; and that their pleas for safety precautions had been rejected by management as too expensive. They also testified that a ripped "crash pad" in the corridor had exposed foam rubber padding.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F1081EFB3E5D0C748CDDAF0894DD484D81
title = HAUNTED CASTLE MANAGER SAYS HE REPORTED PERILS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-07
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FB0B14F93F5D0C778CDDAF0894DD484D81
title = 3 EX-PARK AIDES SAY SAFETY PLEAS WENT UNHEEDED
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-04
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ]

The boy who had come forward as a witness during the initial investigation repeated what he had told investigators earlier, testifying for the prosecution that he had seen another boy his age, a boy he did not know, accidentally set the fire with a cigarette lighter by brushing its flame against a foam wall pad. According to news reports of the trial, no such boy was ever found, and no other witness testified to seeing such a boy. Under cross-examination by the defense, the witness denied starting the fire himself.cite news
url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9E03E3DA1738F931A25754C0A963948260
title = BADEN CRITICIZES INQUIRY BY JERSEY INTO PARK FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-12
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ]

Defense

The defense denied any culpability, saying that company executives had carefully considered all safety recommendations, acting on some and rejecting others; and contending that the fire was arson and that no precautions would have saved lives in a fire where an accelerant was used.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FA0E12FC3E5C0C7A8DDDAE0894DD484D81
title = CLOSING STATEMENTS TO JURORS ARE MADE IN PARK FIRE TRIAL
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-19
accessdate = 2006-12-19 ] A defense forensic pathologist said arson might be the cause, saying that "high levels" of benzene in the victims' blood "could indicate some sinister reason for the fire." However, another defense witness said there were no burn patterns or other evidence of an accelerant.

Park officials testified that smoke alarms had been installed, but the park was unable to control vandalism to them and decided not to reinstall them after 1979. A park official testified that having an employee assigned to walk continually through the attraction was a good alternative to the smoke alarms.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F50E14FC355D0C748EDDAF0894DD484D81
title = FUN HOUSE PATROL CALLED A SUBSTITUTE FOR ALARMS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-06-27
accessdate = 2006-12-18 ] A top fire-safety official testifying for the defense said that sprinklers and smoke detectors might have saved part of the structure, but would not have saved lives because by then "you would have had lethal combustion products throughout the facility", suffocating the victims.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F5061FF73D5C0C738DDDAE0894DD484D81
title = VALUE OF SPRINKLERS DISPUTED
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-10
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] His testimony was later criticised by other fire-safety experts as undermining efforts to advance sprinkler legislation.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F50716FC3E5D0C708EDDAB0894DE484D81
title = FIRE SAFETY OFFICIAL CRITICIZED FOR TESTIMONY ON FATAL JERSEY BLAZE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1986-02-23
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ]

Jury findings

The jury, after an eight-week trial and 13 hours of deliberation, found the two companies not guilty of the charges. Interviewed after the trial, the jury foreman blamed Jackson Township officials for repeatedly allowing the castle to slip through cracks in the fire code. A second juror disagreed, saying that township officials were not derelict. Both jurors held the two companies blameless because they had been told by township officials that they needed no permit or sprinklers.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00A11F73E5C0C708EDDAE0894DD484D81
title = FOREMAN OF JURY BLAMES TOWN FOR SIX FLAGS FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-23
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ] cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F30E1EFC385C0C7B8EDDAE0894DD484D81
title = GREAT ADVENTURE JUROR ABSOLVES TOWNSHIP IN FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-28
accessdate = 2006-11-20 ]

Other aspects

The two park executives charged separately with manslaughter avoided trial and possible imprisonment by entering a [http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/criminal/crpti.htm pretrial intervention program] that allowed them to perform community service.cite news
url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE2DF143DF93BA35750C0A960948260
title = CHARGES DROPPED IN SIX FLAGS CASE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-03-08
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ]

The families of those killed filed civil suits against Bally Manufacturing, the owner of Six Flags; Six Flags; and the castle's builder, the Haunted House Company of East Orange. The suits charged manslaughter and aggravated manslaughter.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00F12F6385F0C708DDDAF0894DC484D81
title = PARENTS SEEK $2.6 BILLION IN SUITS OVER DEATHS OF 4 IN BLAZE AT PARK
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-06-13
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ] One such suit was settled for $2.5 million in December 1985.cite news
url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A03E0DE123BF932A15751C1A963948260
title = Settlement in Fire At Park in Jersey
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-12-21
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ]

afety improvements

Immediately after the fire, several other New Jersey haunted-house attractions were closed pending fire inspections, including the multi-trailer "Gates of Hell" attraction on Casino Pier in Seaside Heights, New Jersey, built by the same company as the Haunted Castle.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F20C12F6345C0C738EDDAC0894DC484D81
title = 'HAUNTED HOUSES' INSPECTED
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-05-20
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ] New Jersey and other states passed new fire-safety laws for dark rides and "any structure that intentionally disorients". cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=FB0810FE3F5F0C708EDDA00894DC484D81
title = JERSEY FIRE PANEL TO SUGGEST AMUSEMENT-PARK IMPROVEMENTS
publisher = New York Times
date = 1984-09-23
accessdate = 2006-11-10 ]

Park attendance fell sharply for the rest of the year, finishing 15 percent below the 3.3 million of the year preceding. Park officials said pre-fire attendance levels were restored the next year after they reassured the public that the park was made safer by the addition of $5.2 million worth of sprinklers and computerized smoke and heat detectors, while industry sources have reported that ensuing poor attendance almost caused the park to close in 1987.cite news
url=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00617FC3F5C0C768DDDAE0894DD484D81
title = PROSECUTOR FACING LEGAL TEAM IN TRIAL ON PARK FIRE
publisher = New York Times
date = 1985-07-15
accessdate = 2006-11-11 ]

The victims

*Joseph Beyroutey, 17, Paterson, NJ
*Nicola Caiazza, 18, Paterson, NJ
*Jose Carrion Jr., 17, Brooklyn, NY
*Tina Genovese, 15, Williamstown, NJ
*Christopher Harrison, 18, Brooklyn, NY
*Eric Rodriguez, 18, Brooklyn, NY
*Lenny Ruiz, 17, Brooklyn, NY
*Samuel Valentin Jr., 17, Brooklyn, NY

Questioning the report

An independent film titled "Doorway to Hell? The Mystery and Controversy Surrounding the Fire at the Haunted Castle" was produced in 2003 by Peter James Smith, a long-time patron of the castle. Smith's documentary questions the official report's finding that the fire was accidental. He speaks of an "emotionally disturbed" youth with a history of setting fires who "kept playing with a lighter in his pocket", and says the youth was seen exiting the Castle as the fire broke out, questioned but not charged.

Smith also says that two earlier visitors on the day of the fire reported seeing a chained exit door, but were not called as witnesses. He further says that diagrams of the castle and its exits used in the trial were inaccurate, and did not show a metal fence erected to protect employees from hostile guests, something that would have made escape more difficult.

ee also

*Six Flags Great Adventure
*Incidents at Six Flags parks

References

External links

* [http://youtube.com/watch?v=QndKjUVG5mU Smith's Haunted Castle documentary at YouTube]
* [http://www.popartpete.com Smith's Haunted Castle documentary and press release]