- Juan de Zumárraga
Juan de Zumárraga (1468 –
3 June 1548 ) was a SpanishBasque Franciscan prelate and firstbishop ofMexico .Zumárraga was born in Durango in the
Biscay province in the Basque Country. He entered theFranciscan Order , and in 1527 was custodian of the convent ofAbrojo , where he received Charles V. Shortly afterwards he was appointed one of the judges of the court for the examination of witches in the Basque province. From his writings it would appear that he looked upon witches merely as women possessed of hallucinations. By this time more detailed accounts of the importance of the conquest ofHernán Cortés began to be received, and on20 December 1527 , Zumárraga was recommended by Charles V for the post of first bishop of Mexico. Without having been consecrated and with only the title of bishop-elect andProtector of the Indians , he, accompanied byAndrés de Olmos , left Spain with the first civil officials, auditors (Oidores ), towards the end of August 1528, and reached Mexico on 6 December. Thirteen days after, two auditors,Alonso de Parada andDiego Maldonado , persons of years and experience, died. Their companions,Juan Ortiz de Matienzo andDiego Delgadillo , assumed their authority, which was also shared by Nuño de Guzmán, who had come from his territories in the Pánuco Valley. Their administration was one of the most disastrous epochs inNew Spain and one of great difficulty for Zumárraga.Cortés had returned to Spain just previous to this and in his absence no limits seem to have been placed to the abuses of the auditors. They impoverished the Indians through taxation, sold them into slavery, branded them with hot irons, sent shiploads to the
Antilles , raped Indian girls, and persecuted with incredible fury the followers of Cortés.Bishop Zumárraga, as Protector of the Indians, endeavoured vainly to defend them. His position was a critical one; the
Spanish monarchy had defined neither the extent of his jurisdiction nor his duties as Protector of the Indians. Moreover, he had not received officialconsecration as a bishop, and was thus at a disadvantage when he attempted to exercise his authority. The Indians appealed to him as protector with all kinds of complaints, sometimes greatly exaggerated. His own Franciscans, who had so long laboured for the welfare of the Indians, pressed him to put an end to the excesses of the auditors. It was clear that he must have an open conflict with the civil officials of the colony, relying only on his spiritual prerogatives, which commanded no respect from these immoral and unprincipled men. Some members of other religious orders, perhaps envious of the influence of the Franciscans, upheld the persecution of the Indians. Bishop Zumárraga attempted to notify the Spanish court of the course of events, but the crafty auditors had established a successfulcensorship of all letters and communications from New Spain. Finally, aBiscay ne sailor concealed a letter in a cake of wax which he immersed in a barrel of oil.Meanwhile news reached Mexico that Cortés had been well received at the Spanish court and was about to return to New Spain. Fearful of the consequences, Nuño de Guzmán left Mexico City on
22 December 1529 , and began his famous expedition toMichoacán ,Jalisco , andSinaloa . The remaining auditors retained power and continued their outrages. In the early part of 1530 they dragged a priest and a former servant of Cortés from a church, quartered him andtorture d his servant. Bishop Zumárraga place the city under interdict, and the Franciscans retired to Texcoco. AtEaster the interdict was lifted, but the auditors were excommunicated for a year. On15 July 1530 , Cortés, now titled Captain General of New Spain, reached Vera Cruz. The Crown appointed new auditors, among themSebastián Ramírez de Fuenleal , Bishop ofSanto Domingo , and the lawyerVasco de Quiroga , who later became the first bishop of Michoacán.In December of the same year, the new "
Audiencia "', the ensemble of auditors, reached Mexico, and with them, an era of peace for both Zumárraga and the Indians. Matienzo and Delgadillo were sent to Spain as prisoners, but Nuño de Guzmán escaped, being then absent in Sinaloa.According to tradition, it was at this time (
9 December –12 December ,1531 ) that the apparition ofOur Lady of Guadalupe on the hill ofTepeyac took place.Meantime the calumnies spread by the enemies of Zumárraga and the partisans of the first auditor had shaken the confidence of the Spanish Court, and he set sail in May 1532 under orders to return to Spain. On his arrival he met his implacable enemy Delgadillo, who, though still under indictment, continued his calumnies. As a result of Delgadillo's charges, Charles V held back the
Bull of Clement VII , originally dated2 September 1530 , that would have named Zumárraga bishop. Zumárraga, however, had little difficulty vindicating his good name, and was consecrated bishop atValladolid on27 April 1533 . After another year in Spain working for favourable concessions for the Indians, he reached Mexico in October 1534, accompanied by a number of mechanics and six female teachers for the Indian girls. He no longer held the title of Protector of the Indians, as it was thought that the new auditors would refrain from the abuses of prior regimes. On14 November 1535 , with the arrival of the first viceroy,Antonio de Mendoza , the rule of the new auditors ended.According to Fray
Toribio de Benavente Motolinia , the number of baptized Indians in Mexico in 1536 was five million. The multitude of Indians who asked for baptism, said to have greatly increased after the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe in 1531, forced the missionaries to adopt a special form for administering this sacrament. The catechumens were arranged in order, with children in front. Prayers were recited in common over all, salt, saliva, etc., applied to a few, and then water was poured on the head of each without using the customary holy oils orchrism . The practice faced no opposition while the Franciscans were in charge of the missions, but as soon as members of other religious orders and some secular ecclesiastics arrived, doubt began to be cast upon the validity of these baptisms. To put an end to the dispute Bishop Zumárraga submitted the case to Rome, and on1 June 1537 ,Pope Paul III issued the bull "Altitudo divini consilii", which declared that the friars had not sinned in administering baptism in this form, but decreed that in future it should not be thus administered except in cases of urgent need.Another difficulty arose regarding marriage. The pre-Columbian religions had permitted
polygamy and the taking ofconcubine s, and when Natives were converted the question arose as to which were legitimate wives and which were concubines, and whether any of the marriages had been valid at all. The Franciscans knew that certain rites were observed for certain unions, and that in some cases where separation ordivorce was desired, it was necessary to obtain the consent of the authorities, while in other cases the consent of the interested parties sufficed. These customs, they argued, meant that there were valid marriages among the Indians. Others denied that this was the case. Bishop Zumárraga took part in all these discussions until the case was submitted to the Holy See. Pope Paul III decreed in the "Altitudo" that the converted Indians should keep the first woman wed as their wife.A third important difficulty concerned the position of the "regular" (non-order affiliated)
clergy and their privileges.Adrian VI on9 May 1522 , issued the bull "Exponi nobis fecisti" to Charles V, in which he transferred his ownApostolic authority in all matters to the Franciscans and other mendicant orders when they judged it necessary for the conversion of the Indians, except for acts as requiring episcopal consecration. This provision affected regions where there was no bishop, or where it required two or more days of travel to reach one. Pope Paul III confirmed the bull on15 January 1535 . The bishops found their authority much limited, and a series of assemblies followed in which Zumárraga with his customary prudence tried to arrive at an understanding with the regulars without openly clashing with them. Various modifications were adopted with the consent of the regulars on condition that these "should not impair the privileges of the regulars". The question therefore remained open. In 1535 Bishop Zumárraga received the title and powers ofApostolic Inquisitor of the diocese of Mexico from theInquisitor General ,Álvaro Manrique ,Archbishop of Seville , including that of delivering criminals to the secular courts. He never availed himself of the title and did not establish the tribunal, although he did indict and deliver a resident of Texcoco accused of having "reverted toidolatry " and of offeringhuman sacrifice s to the secular courts.Meanwhile, Las Casas had gone to Spain and obtained from the
Junta of Valladolid (1541–1542) the approbation of the celebrated "Nuevas Leyes". These laws conclusively and decisively prohibited the enslavement of the Indians, withdrew all grants from all corporations,ecclesiastical andsecular , and from those who were or had been Viceroys,governor s, or employees of any description whatsoever; previous grants were reduced; Indians were taken from owners who had ill-treated them; all governors were deprived of the faculty to "encomendar" (a system of patents which amounted to a virtual enslavement of the Indians); owners were compelled to live upon their own possessions; and in all newly discovered territory no grants could be made.Francisco Tello de Sandoval , commissioned to carry out the new laws, reached Mexico on8 March 1544 .The gravest difficulties confronted him. Those affected by the new laws were almost all the Spaniards of the colony, many of them far advanced in years, who had passed through all the trying period of the conquest, and whom the new laws would leave in abject poverty. These had recourse to Bishop Zumárraga to intercede with Tello to obtain a suspension of the order until they could be heard before the Spanish Court. The representatives of the colonists found the emperor, Charles V, at
Mechlin , on20 October 1545 . In virtue of the situation as explained to him, he modified the general tenor of the laws so that while still correcting the principal abuses, they would not bear too heavily on the Spaniards of the colony. Through the prudent intervention of Bishop Zumárraga and the compliance of Tello, Mexico was undoubtedly saved from a bloody civil struggle such as engulfedPeru on account of the enforcement of these same laws and from which the Indians emerged worse off than they were before.The last years of Bishop Zumárraga's life were devoted to carrying out the numerous works he had undertaken for the welfare of his diocese. Among the chief of these should be mentioned: the school for Indian girls; the famous "Colegio de Santa Cruz" in
Tlatelolco ; the introduction of the first printing press into theNew World ; the foundation of various hospitals, especially those of Mexico and Vera Cruz; the impetus he gave to industries, agriculture, and manufactures, for which he brought trained mechanics and labourers from Spain; and the printing of many books. At the instance of the emperor,Pope Paul III separated (11 February 1546 ) theSee of Mexico from the metropolitanSee of Seville , and erected theArchdiocese of Mexico , appointing Bishop Zumárraga first archbishop and designating the dioceses ofOaxaca ,Michoacán ,Tlaxcala ,Guatemala , andCiudad Real de Chiapas , as suffragans. The Bull of appointment was sent on8 July 1548 , but Bishop Zumárraga had died one month previously.References
*catholic
*cite book |author=Himmerich y Valencia, Robert |origyear=1991 |year=1996 |title=The Encomenderos of New Spain, 1521–1555 |location=Austin |publisher=University of Texas Press |pages=p. 266s-ttl|title=
Archbishop of Mexico
years=1528 – 1548s-ttl|title=Encomendero ofOcuituco
years=1535 – 1544
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.