- Tanning bed
A tanning bed or sunbed is a device emitting
ultraviolet radiation(typically 95% UVA and 5% UVB, +/-3%) used to produce a cosmetic tan. Regular tanning beds use several fluorescent lamps that have phosphor blends designed to emit UV in a spectrum that is somewhat similar to the sun. Smaller home tanning beds usually have 12 to 28 100 watt lamps while systems found in salons can run from 24 to 60 lamps each consuming 100 to 200 watts.
There are also "high pressure" tanning beds that generate primarily UVA with some UVB by using highly specialized quartz lamps, reflector systems and filters. These are less common and much more expensive, thus less commonly used. A
tanning boothis quite similar to a tanning bed, but the individual stands while tanning and the typical power output of booths is higher.
Because of several alleged adverse effects on human health, the
World Health Organizationdoes not recommend the use of UV tanning devices for cosmetic reasons [http://www.who.int/uv/publications/sunbedpubl/en/] . For example, using a sunbed without gogglesmay lead to a condition known as arc eye.
Tanning beds are used for somewhat different reasons in the
United Statesthan in Europe. In the U.S., tanning is more seasonal, where most users begin in January and stop or slow down by June. It is most often used as a way to jump start the tanning process, so that once the summerbegins, they can go to the beach or enjoy other outdoor activities and already have a significant base tan built up. This is also why tanning lotions and bronzers are more commonly used in the United States.
Europeans may enjoy tanning seasonally, but less so than Americans. This is due to many areas in Europe having significantly fewer days of sunshine than the U.S., so Europeans are more likely to use a tanning bed all year long, for both the cosmetic and mood altering benefits. European tanning beds generally use a different type of
lampas well, with UVB ratings in the 1% to 3% range (using US measuring methods) whereas most tanning beds sold in the US use 4.2% to 6.5% UVB ratings, and aftermarket lamps with up to 8.5% or higher being popular. Of course, these lamps have less UVA and will produce a sunburn quicker, but many Americans seem to like them because a short session produces a "reddening", or instant gratification. These lamps actually produce a slower deep tan (but a faster base tan) that fades faster, but are simply marketed as "hotter", although technically they have about the same amount of UV but with different ratios of UVA and UVB.
While the primary reason for both Americans and Europeans to use a tanning bed is cosmetic, there are many other reasons why they are used. It is common for people to tan simply because it makes them feel good. Also, most tanning beds generate a large amount of heat, including
infrared, which has deep penetrating action that can relieve minor muscleaches.
The tan produced by a tanning bed is not as deep as a tan produced in the sun. This is because tanning beds have higher overall levels of UV than the sun on a typical day, so the exposure times are shorter than the average session spent in the sun to achieve the same amount of tan. This can cause someone with a dark indoor tan to go outside and get a bad sunburn quickly because the deeper levels of their
skinhave not been exposed previously, and have no natural protection above what white skin would have. It is strongly recommended that a person does NOT tan indoor and outdoors on the same day, due to the likely chance that they will get overexposed. Because overexposure actually destroys melanin, getting a sunburn will result in LESS tanning. The popular wisdom that you "need to burn to tan" or that a sunburn will turn into a tan is simply wrong, and greatly increases your chances for skin cancer later in life.Fact|article|date=November 2007
In many ways, tanning beds are simply light fixtures that you lie down on to tan. Most tanning beds use
choke ballasts, a technology that has been around for about 100 years, consisting of a simple inductorwhich limits amount of current passing through, and requires a lamp starter to preheat the ends of the lamp briefly at start. Newer ballast systems include magnetic ballasts, electronic ballastsand more recently high frequency ballaststhat induce tanning and other fluorescent lamps to work using less wattage, by using higher frequencies. In general, newer ballast designs produce less heat and are more energy efficient. All choke ballasts require 230V only because no one has found a need for 120V choke ballasts in tanning manufacturing.
The ballasts regulate the power that is sent to the lamps, so that if you install a 160W lamp in a tanning bed that has 100W ballasts, only 100W will be delivered to the lamp. The lamp will still ignite and offers no benefits over a 100W lamp, and may actually create less UV since it is designed for higher current. It will not damage the system, although installing 160W lamps with a 100W ballast will result in very short lamp life, as the 160W lamp cathode/anode sets are typically designed to run at much higher temperature. The
lamp starterpart of the bed (small tan cylinder) is used only on beds with choke ballasts and is a simple plasma starting switch. It has no bearing on how powerful the bed is. Either it works (the lamp lights) or doesn't. They are installed one per lamp on beds that use them, and are generally replaced every couple of years in salons or every 6 to 10 years for infrequently used systems.
fluorescent lamps(and other plasma devices such as neon lamps), low pressure tanning lamps work when the ballast directs enough energy to the lamp that a plasma is generated inside the lamp. The lamps are coated on the inside with special phosphors and contain a small amount of mercury (20mg typical). Unlike high pressure lamps, the glass that is used in low pressure lamps automatically filters out all UVC. Once the plasma is fully flowing (less than one second), the plasma literally strips away the outer electrons from the mercury, sending them into the phosphor, which produces photons in the proper spectrum for tanning. The electrons, now in a lower energy state, will jump back into place onto the first mercury atom they find with an electron missing.
The surfaces on which the tanner lies and shield the user by physical separation from the lamps on the bench and canopy are typically referred to as the "acrylics". Acrylics are manufactured from a base material of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA), type UVT (UV-transmitting), which has been formulated to have a spectral transmittance in the wavelength region 290-400 nm [ASTM International.(2002). "Standard Specification for Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Plastic Sheet". Designation: D 4802-02] . This should not be confused with a standard acrylic, or "plexiglass", which would not transmit within this spectral range effectively inhibiting the tanning properties of the unit.
Base resins are typically cell-cast or extruded into sheet and then thermoformed to manufacture the acrylics. On occasion, depending on the complexity of the part, the resin will be injection molded. It is due to the expense of the specially formulated resin, handling considerations and manufacturing processes which drive the cost of acrylic parts, which can be high when compared to standard grade acrylic which can be purchased at your local home improvement store.
These acrylic materials should never be cleaned with any agent containing alcohol (i.e. glass cleaner), as this will adversely affect the material surface causing a phenomenon known a "crazing". This will present itself as small fissures resembling spiderwebs forming where stresses are most concentrated on the part and in the region which was subjected to the chemical attack.
These shields break down over time as they are exposed to UV and oxygen and must be reconditioned every few years. Failure to do so will reduce the transparency of the acrylic to UV rays, although to the eye it will still appear perfectly clear. The reconditioning is most commonly done with a compound called Novus #2, which is a slightly gritty cleaning compound that removes a microlayer of the acrylic, restoring to near new condition and is used in many other industries. This being said, a better practice is to replace the acrylic as the oxidation described above affects the physical properties of the material rendering it less impact resistant.
Most mainstream tanning beds built today use similar electronics, with the primary differences being in the design and quality of the frame and shell of the bed, as well as the number and type of lamps used. The newer electronics are very promising because of their lower power usage, cooler running temperature, and more environmentally friendly components.
In the United States, the maximum exposure time in most tanning beds is 20 minutes but varies from bed to bed. This is calculated by the manufacturer according to the amount of time needed to produce 4 MEDs (minimal
erythemaldoses). This is essentially 4 times the amount of UV that is required to produce a reddening on unexposed skin. A person would start with a much shorter session time and work their way to the maximum exposure time in about 4 weeks. Every tanning bed is required to have a "Recommended Exposure Schedule" on both the front of the tanning bed and in the owners manual. It must also list the original lamp that was certified for that particular tanning bed, and salon owners must replace the lamps with either the exact same lamp, or a lamp that is certified by the lamp manufacturer to be legally equivalent. Lamp replacement and salon compliance is regulated by the individual state in the USA, whereas the manufacturing and sale of new equipment is regulated by the federal government.
Since many factors can change the performance of any given individual lamp, the
FDArequires that every tanning bed model is certified separately, and lamps themselves do not have MED ratings. Lamps do have typical TE (or Time Exposure) ratings, but these are not used for certifying beds. Session times on beds can range from 5 minutes to 45 minutes, depending on many factors.
At this time, the European Union is discussing new regulations that would limit the amount of UVB allowed in tanning lamps and devices. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/newspapers/sunday_times/scotland/article737683.ece]
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is commonly opinionated by environmentalists to be "the most prominent and universal cancer-causing agent in our environment." [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10711242&dopt=Citation Skin cancer and solar UV radiation. [Eur J Cancer. 1999 - PubMed Result ] ] The US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program Report on
Carcinogens(cancer-causing agents) states that UV solar radiation, and use of sun lamps and sun beds are "known to be a human carcinogen." [ [http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm?objectid=72016262-BDB7-CEBA-FA60E922B18C2540 NTP: Report on Carcinogens (RoC) ] ] . Some scientists have suggested recently that there may be an association between UVA radiation (the type of radiation that makes up most of the radiation in tanning beds) and malignant melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer. [http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/tanning.html This Information Has Been Relocated ] ] There is persuasive evidence that each of the three main types of skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma, is caused by sun exposure. [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11684447&dopt=Citation The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. [J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001 - PubMed Result ] ] Women who visited a tanning parlor at least once a month were 55% more likely to later develop melanomathan women who didn't artificially suntan. Those who used sun lamps to tan while in their 20s had the greatest later risk, about 150% higher than similarly aged women who shunned tanning beds. [Veierod, M. The Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Oct. 15, 2003; vol 95: pp 1530-1538 cited from http://www.webmd.com/melanoma-skin-cancer/news/20031016/tanning-salons-boost-skin-cancer-risk]
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation induces two of the most common DNA mutations known in cellular biology. Those include cyclobutane–pyrimidine
dimers(CPDs) and 6–4 photo products (6–4PPs) and their Dewar valence isomers. [ [http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/PP/article.asp?doi=b201230h PPS Articles ] ] . Cells have developed a number of repair mechanisms to counteract the DNA damage caused by ultraviolet radiation and other toxins. In human cells, a repair process is initiated after DNA damage is detected in which the damaged DNA is removed before it is replicated. As humans age, their cellular repair mechanisms make more errors because they have accumulated years of oxidative stress from daily life. [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11525876&dopt=Abstract Oxidative stress and protein aggregation during bi... [Exp Gerontol. 2001 - PubMed Result ] ] . Over time, it is more difficult for the cell to find and destroy aberrant DNA. The replication of damaged DNA leads to cancer, and exposure to UV radiation sets a process in motion that can take decades to ultimately cause skin cancer [ [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1600-0749.2003.00117.x/full/?cookieSet=1 Blackwell Synergy - Cookie Absent ] ] . Similarly, most people who smoke cigarettes do not get lung cancer until decades of use have passed. Most critically, if a mutation occurs within a gene that regulates cell division, the cell becomes prone to malignancy. For example, squamous cell carcinoma(a type of skin cancer) is caused by a UVB induced mutation in the p53gene. [ [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/88/22/10124 A Role for Sunlight in Skin Cancer: UV-Induced p53 Mutations in Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Brash et al. 88 (22): 10124 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ] ]
Exposure to UV radiation has a detrimental effect on the immune system. Exposure causes changes in
antigenpresentation by Langerhans cellsand macrophages. Also, the activities of natural killer cells and T cellsis reduced. Last, cytokineregulation is disrupted by UV exposure. [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10354063&dopt=Citation The effects of ultraviolet radiation on the human ... [Br J Dermatol. 1999 - PubMed Result ] ] Ultraviolet radiation exposure may facilitate the growth of skin neoplasmsand the spreading of skin-associated infections due to stimulation of suppressor T cells. [ [http://archderm.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/127/1/99 Arch Dermatol - Abstract: In vivo ultraviolet irradiation of human skin results in profound perturbation of the immune system. Relevance to ultraviolet-induced skin cancer, January 1991, Baadsgaard 127 (1): 99 ] ]
While the dangers of UVB are widely recognized [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0091-6765(200003)108%3C71%3ASSPASC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6] [ [http://www.nature.com/jid/journal/v95/n5/abs/5612809a.html Journal of Investigative Dermatology - Abstract of article: Susceptibility to Effects of UVB Radiation on Induction of Contact Hypersensitivity as a Risk Factor for Skin Cancer in Humans ] ] [ [http://carcin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/723 COX-2 expression is induced by UVB exposure in human skin: implications for the development of skin cancer - Buckman et al. 19 (5): 723 - Carcinogenicities ] ] , the dangers of UVA are less understood. UVA is less likely to burn the skin, and it has been called the "bronzing light." However, it is clearly associated with inducing aging changes in the skin and in promoting the development of skin cancer. This is because UVA penetrates the skin more deeply than UVB, and therefore causes damage on a deeper level. Most aging of skin is due to UVA rays destroying collagen and connective tissue beneath the superficial layer of the skin. UVB rays do not reach as far below the skin. Excessive exposure to UVA radiation has its risks, which could may cause premature aging, including wrinkles, sunspots, and loss of skin elasticity. [ [http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/337/20/1419 NEJM - Pathophysiology of Premature Skin Aging Induced by Ultraviolet Light ] ]
One study conducted amongst a college student population found that awareness of the risks of tanning beds did not deter the students from using them. [ [http://archderm.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/138/10/1311 Arch Dermatol - Abstract: Awareness of the Risks of Tanning Lamps Does Not Influence Behavior Among College Students, October 2002, Knight et al. 138 (10): 1311 ] ]
Although rare, it is possible for tanning beds to be a vector for infections of
pubic lice, also known as crabs. [ [http://media.www.dailytoreador.com/media/storage/paper870/news/2004/04/19/LocalNews/Public.Areas.Could.Be.New.Source.Of.Stis-1278676.shtml Public areas could be new source of STIs - Local News ] ] If the surface of the bed is not properly cleaned or if towels provided by the salon are not washed in hot water, crab lice can survive for several days on these surfaces. Crab lice are difficult to see on the acrylic of a dimly lit tanning bed, and they are not killed by anti-bacterial or anti-viral cleaning agents used in salons. Fact|date=February 2008 They can only be killed by physical removal or by the use of insecticides such as pyrethrin.
Tanning Beds vs. Natural Sunlight
Tanning beds have a different ratio of UVA to UVB radiation as well as a different overall UV spectrum than sunlight does. Furthermore, the radiation levels are more intense, requiring individuals to limit their exposure to very brief periods. One study found that the amount of UVA radiation, which penetrates deeper into the skin, was anywhere from about 3-8 times greater in the tanning beds than in the light from the sun. [Woollons, A., Clingen, P.H., Price, M.L., Arlett, C.F., Green, M.H.L. (1997). Induction of mutagenic DNA damage in human fibroblasts after exposure to artificial tanning lamps. British Journal of Dermatology 1997; 137: 687-692.]
While there appears to be a link between indoor tanning beds and cancer [ [http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190962205025818 Elsevier Article Locator ] ] [ [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1600-0749.2003.00117.x/full/ Blackwell Synergy - Cookie Absent ] ] , the connection is not possible to indisputably prove because people who tan indoors also tan outdoors. Furthermore, cancer shows up decades after exposure. Lastly, there is a genetic component to skin cancer. None of this changes the fact that there are risks (and benefits, such as vitamin D production) associated with exposure to ultraviolet.
Exposure to UVB [http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/67/6/1108.pdf] light in the 295 nm to 297 nm spectra (regardless of source) leads to production of
vitamin Din the skin. Vitamin D is important for a number of human functions, including the maintenance of normal blood levels of phosphorus and calcium and the promotion of healthy bones. Studies have shown that many people don't get enough of the vitamin, which may even aid in the prevention of cancer, diabetes, and HIV. [Nina Shen Rastogi, [http://www.slate.com/id/2187566/ "Is Sunbathing Good for You? Fact-Checking New Claims from the Indoor Tanning Association"] , "Slate Magazine", March 27, 2008] However, because tanning beds use bulbs that emit mostly UVA light (95% UVA and 5% UVB), tanning beds do not appreciably help the body produce vitamin D.
Tanning makes most people feel good. To understand how this happens, researchers set out to determine if endorphin levels were increased after tanning. They concluded that there were no significant differences in the mean plasma levels of β-endorphin between people who were exposed to tanning beds and those who were not. [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12452872&dopt=Abstract Plasma levels of opioid peptides after sunbed expo... [Br J Dermatol. 2002 - PubMed Result ] ] The positive psychological benefits of tanning may be due to factors other than endorphins.
It is believed that indoor tanning beds are useful for the treatment of SAD (
Seasonal Affective Disorder), [ [http://www.lookingfit.com/articles/031healt.html Dealing With SAD ] ] [ [http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/1659/1/Seasonal-Affective-Disorder-and-Tanning-Salons.html Seasonal Affective Disorder and Tanning Salons ] ] though this is disputed at present. [ [http://www.aafp.org/afp/980315ap/saeed.html Seasonal Affective Disorders - March 15, 1998 - American Academy of Family Physicians ] ] It is plausible that the benefit that many SAD patients experience are more due to tanning causing them to feel good in general, rather than treating the SAD itself.
While a tan that is developed in a tanning bed does offer some protection from overexposure to the natural sun, it is more cosmetic than a natural tan. A tan provides a natural SPF of between 2 and 4. Depending on the intensity of the sun outside, it may be advisable to use additional lotion with SPF even if a base tan is present.
A more controversial benefit of tanning indoors rather than tanning outside is the amount of control the tanner has. If a person decides to get a suntan and wants to minimize the risk of getting a sunburn, a tanning bed offers an environment that delivers the same amount of UV in a given period of time, day after day. In contrast, the amount of UV that reaches the ground can vary from minute to minute and the longer tanning times results in deeper exposure. This doesn't make the tan in a tanning bed safer per se, but it can reduce the chance of a sunburn as it allows total control over the amount of exposure a person receives.
Tanning beds also offer time savings when compared to tanning outdoors. Most tanning beds offer a maximum session time of 20 minutes and a person can maintain a tan with 1 to 2 sessions per week. For individuals living in urban areas, or who work extended hours, a tanning bed may be the only opportunity for tanning or UV exposure of any kind.
Some people with
psoriasisor eczemaare treated with UVB light therapy. This is typically in the 310 nm to 315 nm portion of the UVB spectrum. Virtually all fluorescent tanning lamps have one spectral peak within this region of the UVB spectrum, making them an effective tool in mild to moderate cases. In some circumstances, salon memberships have been prescribed and more rarely the purchase of home tanning beds have been prescribed by doctors and may be covered by insurance policies. Tanning may temporarily help some forms of acneby drying out the skin, but it is not a solution that lasts for very long. [ [http://www.skincarephysicians.com/acnenet/FAQ.html Acne FAQs ] ] [ [http://www.celebrate.uchc.edu/girls/body/skin.html Your Skin: Acne, Psoriasis, Tanning ] ] [ [http://www.kidshealth.org/parent/general/body/acne_myths.html Acne Myths ] ] Further, most prescription or over the counter acne medications (e.g. Accutane, Benzoyl Peroxide, Retin-A) should not be used in combination with ultraviolet exposure or the user may experience negative side effects from burning to delayed healing due to photosensitivitythat these drugs (and many others) can create.
Addiction to tanning is extremely rare and may be due to several underlying psychological issues. The mechanism for addiction is unknown at this time. 'Tanorexia', as it is colloquially known, is a subset of tanning addiction and symptoms include a false and persistent belief that he or she is too pale, and will therefore exceed normally accepted limits of UV exposure. The individual will seek out this exposure indoors or outdoors, with the goal of obtaining a tan that is dark enough for his or her tastes. This condition is likely to be comorbid with
body dysmorphic disorder. [ [http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190962206014976 Elsevier Article Locator ] ] . Neither tanning addiction nor tanorexia are covered under the latest edition of the DSM-IV, though they are most likely versions of similar problems already on record. To that end, a 2005 article in The Archives of Dermatology presents a case for UV light tanning addiction to be viewed as a type of substance abuse disorder. [ [http://archderm.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/141/8/963 Arch Dermatol - Abstract: UV Light Tanning as a Type of Substance-Related Disorder, August 2005, Warthan et al. 141 (8): 963 ] ]
Although tanning beds were initially brought to America by Friedrich Wolff in
1978, he soon patented his particular blend of phosphors (since expired) and began licensing the technology to other companies. Wolff Systems has since devoted all their resources into lamp technology and development. Some of the early adopters of the Wolff technology include ETS, Inc., SCA, Sun Industries, Inc., Montego Bay, Sunal. Later, Friedrich sold Wolff Systems to his brother Jorg Wolff, who was the founder of Cosmedico, Ltd., another pioneer in the tanning industry.
Initially, tanning beds were virtually unregulated in the US, but in 1988 (and later updated in 1999) the primary source of regulation at the federal level was [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=21&PART=1040&SECTION=20&YEAR=1999&TYPE=TEXT 21 CFR 1040.20] . This law was designed primarily to ensure that all tanning beds sold or used in salons adhered to a general set of safety rules, with the primary focus on tanning bed and lamp manufacturers in regards to maximum exposure times and product equivalence. It is left up to each individual state to determine the regulations for salons themselves, and as such, many states are still not regulated beyond these basic federal rules.
Several companies continue to license the Wolff name and use their lamps because of the name recognition, although this has steadily diminished over the years as other lamp builders have created lamps that are arguably as good as or better. Licensing is not required to use Wolff lamps, but it is required to call a tanning bed a "Wolff System" and use the Wolff System logo, a yellow circle with horizonal bars and the name "Wolff Systems" in black. Tanning beds that use Wolff products but do not pay royalties can use only the term "Powered by Wolff," which is unique in the industry.
Most modern tanning beds have not changed much from the original systems. The lamp technology and electronics have evolved over the years, but the basic "low pressure" tanning bed has not evolved. The original electronics used in the first tanning beds, both "European choke" and magnetic, are still in use today although there are now many other choices including electronic and high frequency. The lamps are still fluorescent type, using special phosphors that create a spectrum in the UVA and UVB range although there has been a great deal of advancement over the years to make the light spectrum they emit more "sun-like".
The first original tanning lamps were discovered by accident in 1903 by a German company called Heraeus who were developing lighting systems for the home and for industrial usage. These lamps were of the high-pressure metal halide variety. They discovered that the light that was developed for visible light purposes also emitted ultra-violet light. In the 1920s and 1930's they (Heraeus) first started to market and sell single lamp, self standing tanning/wellness devices. The first high-pressure tanning beds incorporating more than a single high-pressure lamp were manufactured in the mid to late seventies by companies such as Ultrabronz and JK Ergoline and in the 1980s the first high-pressure units were exported to the United States.
These units require special filter glass to remove the UVC and the majority of the UVB that is emitted and are difficult to manufacture because the alignment of the lamps is more critical than in traditional low-pressure tanning beds. They are generally large units, with a padded area to lie on or an acrylic and 6 to 36 lamps in a canopy or canopy and bench configuration, the tanning effect is much deeper and requires only a maintenance exposure of about 2-3 times per month compared to every 48 hours for regular tanning beds. They are much more expensive to operate, thus more expensive for the user. Retail prices in the $20,000 to $35,000 range are common with individual sessions costing $20 to $45, depending on the market.
A growing trend is the home tanning bed. Many people are now opting to own their own tanning system instead of going to the salon. The primary reasons are sanitation concerns and convenience. The average home system has 16 to 24 lamps, and costs $2000 to $3000, making its price competitive (over a number of years) for tanners who frequent salons regularly. This has led to an explosion of retailers that feature smaller, home style tanning beds both on the internet and in traditional retail stores.
Another trend is spray on tanning (a form of sunless tanning), using either special booths or a hand held setup similar to an airbrush. Many people who try spray on tanning often still go to the tanning salon, and use the spray on as a way to jump start the appearance of a tan, while others use it as a way to look tan while avoiding UV exposure of any kind. This is also demonstrated by the large number of indoor tanning lotions that have "bronzers" included, which is similar to the chemicals used for spray on tans, DHA.
* [http://www.tanningbedsoutlet.com Buying Tanning Beds as well as extensive information]
* [http://www.tanningbedconcerns.com/dangers-tanning-beds.html Vitamin D research may have doctors prescribing sunshine]
* [http://www.tanningbeds.org TanningBeds.org] Q & A for owners of older tanning beds
* [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=21&PART=1040&SECTION=20&YEAR=1999&TYPE=TEXT Title 12 CFR 1040.20] US FDA regulations that cover tanning lamps and devices
* [http://www.who.int/uv/publications/sunbedpubl/en/ WHO - Artificial tanning sunbeds: risk and guidance]
* [http://home.howstuffworks.com/question639.htm/ How Stuff Works - Sunless Tanning]
* [http://www.healthpolitics.org/archives.asp?previous=trouble_with_tanning_beds Health Politics: The Trouble with Tanning Beds]
* [http://www.theita.com/ ITA - Indoor Tanning Association]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5303522.stm BBC NEWS: "Doctors' call to regulate sunbeds"]
* [http://www.skincancer.org/artificial/index.php, The Case Against Indoor Tanning]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.