Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act

Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act

The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) of 1975 was a statute enacted by the California Legislature in August 1975 (and signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown in September) which was intended to lower medical malpractice liability insurance premiums for healthcare providers in that state by decreasing their potential tort liability. MICRA's stated justification, in turn, was to keep healthcare providers as a whole financially solvent, thus lowering the cost of healthcare services and increasing their availability. Almost all of MICRA is still in effect and still part of California law.



MICRA consists of the following parts:

  • Damage cap - non-economic damages are limited to $250,000 (and this amount is not indexed for inflation).
  • Attorney's fee cap - attorney fees that are taken from the amount of the settlement are limited.
  • Time limits - shortened statute of limitations for actions against healthcare providers.
  • Binding arbitration.
  • Periodic payments - doctors are allowed to pay the award over time.

These are codified at a number of different locations in the California Codes: Business & Professions Code Section 6146, Civil Code Sections 3333.1 and 3333.2, and Code of Civil Procedure Section 667.7.


Between 1985 and 1988, malpractice premiums rose 47 percent.[1] After 1988, the insurance premiums in California experienced a decrease. It is contested as to whether this decrease was a result of Proposition 103. Proposition 103 enacted Section 1861.01 of the California Insurance Code, which explicitly required the rollback of insurance premiums by "at least 20%".[2]


The perceived success of MICRA in helping California healthcare providers stay financially solvent in turn inspired similar tort reform initiatives in other states. A prominent example was Nevada's Question 3, which was enacted by the voters of that state in 2004 by a 60% majority. Like MICRA, Question 3 set a maximum schedule for attorney's fees, and capped noneconomic damages at a slightly higher number, $350,000. Question 3 was also known as the KODIN Initiative after its main sponsor, Keep Our Doctors In Nevada. KODIN promoted Question 3 by pointing to an alleged trend of Nevada doctors fleeing the state for states with lower malpractice premiums like California. To directly counter KODIN, the Nevada plaintiffs' bar put Questions 4 and 5 on the same ballot, and both 4 and 5 were defeated.


  1. ^ The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, How Insurance Reform Lowered Doctors' Medical Malpractice Rates in California: and How Malpractice Caps Failed, (March 7, 2003)
  2. ^ Cal. Ins. Code § 1861.01.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Medical malpractice — Tort law Part of the …   Wikipedia

  • MICRA — Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act …   Medical dictionary

  • MICRA — • Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act …   Dictionary of medical acronyms & abbreviations

  • MICRA — Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (Governmental » US Government) …   Abbreviations dictionary

  • Tort reform in the United States — refers to a topic of debate over the changes to the tort law system of liability and damages. While the phrase tort reform might imply any change in tort law or procedure, the commonly understood use in political and academic arenas describes a… …   Wikipedia

  • Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank — Court Court of Appeals of California Full case name Paul Osborn et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, versus Irwin Memorial Blood Bank et al., Defendants and Appellants …   Wikipedia

  • Capp — or CAPP may refer to: Contents 1 Surname 2 In science and technology 3 Other uses …   Wikipedia

  • Insider Exclusive — The INSIDER EXCLUSIVE TV show regularly produces original Dateline, 60 Minutes, 20/20, and Prime Time style TV Shows for the public and broadcasts them on major cable networks such as PBS, CNN, MSNBC, Tru TV, Fox, TimeWarner and Comcast, Cox,… …   Wikipedia

  • Tort reform — refers to the idea of changing the rules applicable to the law of tort. Tort deals with compensation for wrongs and harm done by one party to another s person, property or other protected interests (e.g. reputation, under libel and slander laws) …   Wikipedia

  • Health care reform debate in the United States — See also: Health care reform in the United States, Health care in the United States, and Uninsured in the United States Health care in the United States Public health care Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Indian Health Service… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”