- Fothad II of Cennrígmonaid
Fothad II, Bishop of Cennrígmonaid was the
bishop of Cennrígmonaid, (1059–1093) equivalent to modernSt. Andrews , for most of the reign of King Máel Coluim III mac Donnchada (1058–1093). Alternative spellings include "Fodhoch", "Fothach" and "Foderoch", and "Fothawch" (byAndrew of Wyntoun ). A "Modach filius Malmykel" is mentioned in a grant, dated 1093, as the bishop of St. Andrews. The text is from the "Registrum of the Priory of St. Andrews", and is a later translation from Gaelic. This bishop is certainly the same as Fothad II, which means Fothad's father was a man named Máel Míchéil. [See Sir Archibald Lawrie, "Early Scottish Charters Prior to A.D. 1153", (Glasgow, 1905), s.v. XI, pp. 9-10, with notes on pp. 239-40; for details about the "Registrum of the Priory of St. Andrews", see John Bannerman, "MacDuff of Fife," in A. Grant & K.Stringer (eds.) "Medieval Scotland: Crown, Lordship and Community, Essays Presented to G.W.S. Barrow", (Edinburgh, 1993), pp.20-38]According to
Andrew of Wyntoun , Fothad performed the marriage ceremony between King Máel Coluim and the woman who would be his second wife, Margaret. [John Macqueen, Winifred MacQueen, & D.E.R. Watt, (eds.), "Scottichronicon by Walter Bower in Latin and English", Vol. 3, (Aberdeen, 1995), p. 463, n. 27.] An early 12th century archdeacon ofYork claimed that Fothad, on the instructions of Queen Margaret, had submitted to theArchbishop of York , [see Alan Orr Anderson, "Scottish Annals from English Chroniclers: AD 500-1286", (London, 1908), republished, Marjorie Anderson (ed.) (Stamford, 1991), p. 131, n. 2.] although modern historians are usually inclined to doubt this. [e.g. Marjorie Ogilvie Anderson, "St. Andrews before Alexander I, in G.W.S. Barrow (ed.), "The Scottish Tradition", (Edinburgh, 1994), p. 4.]He was influential enough for his death in 1093 to be noticed by the "
Annals of Ulster ", which calls him "Fothud ardepscop Alban" (i.e. "Fothad, High Bishop [Archbishop?] of Scotland"). [AU 1093.2, [http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/G100001A/text664.html text] & [http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100001A/text663.html English translation] ; see also Alan Orr Anderson, "Early Sources of Scottish History: AD 500-1286", 2 Vols, (Edinburgh, 1922), vol. ii., p. 49]His immediate successor, according to the bishop list of
Walter Bower , was Giric; [MacQueen "et al.", "op. cit.", p. 345.] but the next consecrated bishop we know about from other sources is Turgot. The obvious question is, did the bishopric really lie vacant for a decade and a half, did Bower or his source invent Giric, or did Giric actually succeed? The former options hardly seem probable in the context.Notes
References
*Anderson, Alan Orr, "Early Sources of Scottish History: AD 500-1286", 2 Vols, (Edinburgh, 1922)
*Anderson, Alan Orr, "Scottish Annals from English Chroniclers: AD 500-1286", (London, 1908), republished, Marjorie Anderson (ed.) (Stamford, 1991)
*Anderson, Marjorie Ogilvie, "St. Andrews before Alexander I, in G.W.S. Barrow (ed.), "The Scottish Tradition", (Edinburgh, 1994), pp. 1-13
*Bannerman, John, "MacDuff of Fife," in A. Grant & K.Stringer (eds.) "Medieval Scotland: Crown, Lordship and Community, Essays Presented to G.W.S. Barrow", (Edinburgh, 1993), pp.20-38
*Barrow, G.W.S., "The Clergy of St. Andrews", in "The Kingdom of the Scots", 2nd Ed., (Edinburgh, 2003), pp. 187-202
*Lawrie, Sir Archibald, "Early Scottish Charters Prior to A.D. 1153", (Glasgow, 1905)
*MacQueen, John, MacQueen, Winifred & Watt, D.E.R. (eds.), "Scottichronicon by Walter Bower in Latin and English", Vol. 3, (Aberdeen, 1995)External links
* [http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/G100001A/text664.html Annals of Ulster s.a. 1093]
** [http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100001A/text663.html English Translation]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.