Weasel word

"Weasel words" is an informal term for words that are ambiguous and cannot be substantiated by facts. They are typically used to create an illusion of clear, direct communication.

Weasel words are usually expressed with deliberate imprecision with the intention to mislead the listeners or readers into believing statements for which sources are not readily available. Tactics that are used include:

*vague generalizations
*use of the passive voice
*non sequitur statements
*use of grammatical devices such as qualifiers and the subjunctive mood
*use of euphemisms (e.g., replacing "firing staff" with "streamlining the workforce")

Origin

The expression "weasel word" derives from the egg-eating habits of weasels. An egg that a weasel has sucked will look intact to the casual observer, but the egg is actually empty. Similarly, words or claims that turn out to be empty upon analysis are known as "weasel words." The expression first appeared in Stewart Chaplin's short story "Stained Glass Political Platform", published in 1900 in "The Century Magazine",According to "The Macmillan Dictionary of Contemporary Phrase and Fable"] which refers to them as ". . . words that suck the life out of the words next to them, just as a weasel sucks the egg and leaves the shell."

In the political sphere, this type of language is used to "spin" or alter the public's perception of an issue. In 1916, Theodore Roosevelt argued that
". . . one of our defects as a nation is a tendency to use . . . 'weasel words'; when one 'weasel word' is used . . . after another there is nothing left." cite book
last =Crystal
first =Hilary
authorlink =
coauthors =David Crystal
year =2000
title =Words on Words: Quotations about Language and Languages
publisher =University of Chicago Press
location =
id =ISBN 0226122018 p. 199]

Examples

*"A growing body of evidence..." [cite web
title=Stop him before he votes
url=http://www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=20060116_119672_119672quote=suggests that today's 18-year-olds are too immature to vote. We should be talking about raising the voting age, not lowering it...] (Where is the raw data for your review?)
* "Our product is so good, it was even given away in celebrity gift bags." (True, perhaps, but not relevant.)
* "See why more of our trucks are sold in southern California than in any other part of the country." (Southern California is a big vehicle market.)
* "Nobody else's product is better than ours." (They're all about the same.)
* "Becoming involved with this problem would be beneficial to us." (In what way would it be beneficial?)
*"People say..." (Which people? How do they know?)
*"Critics claim..." (Which critics?)
*"I heard that..." (Who told you? Is the source reliable?)
*"There is evidence that..." (What evidence? Is the source reliable?)
*"Experience shows that..." (Whose experience? What was the experience? How does it demonstrate this?)
*"It has been mentioned that..." (Can these mentioners be trusted?)
*"Popular wisdom has it that..." (Is popular wisdom a test of truth?)
*"It is known that..." (By whom and what method is it known?)

Generalizations and non sequitur statements

The vagueness of a statement may disguise the validity or the aim of that statement. Generalizing by means of quantifiers, such as "many" or "better", and the passive voice ("it has been decided") conceal the full picture.

"Non sequitur" statements are often used in advertising to make it appear that the statement is a sales point.Some generalizations are considered unacceptable in writing. This category embraces what is termed a "semantic cop-out", represented by the term "allegedly". cite book
last =Garber
first =Marjorie B.
authorlink =
coauthors =
year =
title =Academic Instincts
publisher =Princeton University Press
location =
id =ISBN 0691115710 p. 140 "it is alleged"] This phrase, which became something of a catch phrase on the weekly satirical BBC television series "Have I Got News For You", implies an absence of ownership of opinion, which casts a limited doubt on the opinion being articulated.

Extrapolating

Extrapolating through the use of grammatical devices such as qualifiers and the subjunctive can be used to introduce facts which are beyond the proof of the cited work. This is a legitimate function of language, which resembles weaseling. When it is impractical to enumerate and cite many individual works, then the use of these grammatical devices conforms to the standards established by tradition.For example: "For scientists as for so many others, evolution served as an example of a fundamental challenge to long-held convictions".

Also rhetorically valid is the use of the neuter pronoun "it" and the adverb "there" as impersonal dummy subjects, as when an author intends to distance himself/herself from the work, or to separate one part of the text from another:

* "At the beginning, it was the train that was late."
* "It was a matter of total indifference that..."
* "After the end of the Californian gold rush, there were many ghost towns."
* "There are people who wash very infrequently."

The personal pronoun "one", as a subject or an object in formal speech, that refers either to oneself or as a generalization to anyone in a similar situation, may also be used justifiably to distance a speaker from a subject.

* "One wonders what else was being discussed that evening".
* "What can one do in circumstances such as these?"

Passive voice

The passive voice can be used in English to weasel away from blame. A passive construction occurs when the object of an action is made into the subject of a sentence, or the object (usually indicated by "by the") is missing altogether, as the sentence "mistakes were made by the politicians", for example, has been curtailed deliberately to "mistakes were made".

* "Mistakes were made."
* "Over 120 different contaminants have been dumped into the river."
* "Becoming involved with this problem would be beneficial to us."
* "It has been suggested that this article or section be..."

In the example: "Mistakes were made," it is clear that the names of the persons who made mistakes is being withheld and the intention of weaseling is obvious.
In the "over 120 different contaminants..." sentence, a more precise number of "contaminants" might have avoided the impression of weaseling, even though we might never know who the "dumpers" were.
"Becoming involved with this problem would be beneficial to us", has more to do with style than weaseling, as it would be much better to use the active voice: "It would be beneficial to us to become involved with this problem". This is a particular issue which engages the attention of many linguists and teachers who discourage the passive voice being used too frequently. [ [http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/passivevoice.html Passive Voice ] ] [ [http://ace.acadiau.ca/english/grammar/passive.htm Passive Voice ] ]

However, in the sentence
* "100 votes are required to pass the bill",

the usage of the passive voice is not necessarily connected with weaseling. The phrase, "100 votes are required to pass the bill", is probably a statement of fact, that it is exactly 100 votes which are needed for the passing of the bill, and it might be impossible to predict where these votes are to come from. For a statement to be a weasel expression, it needs other indications of disingenuousness than the mere fact that it is expressed in the passive voice.

In business

Weasel words may be used to detract from an uncomfortable fact, such as the act of firing staff. By replacing "firing staff" with "headcount reduction", one may soften meaning. cite web
title =Has Downsizing Gone too Far?
work =University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA, December, 1995.
url =http://www.iopsych.org/downsize.htm
accessdate=2007-10-05]
Jargon of this kind is used to describe things euphemistically. In certain kinds of advertisements, words are missing or withheld deliberately to influence the buyer. Words such as "more" or "better" are misleading due to the absence of a comparison:

* "...up to 50% off." (How many items were actually decreased in price by half? The statement holds true even if the price of only one item is reduced by half, and the rest by very little.)
* "... is now 20% cheaper!" (Is it really 20% cheaper than the last product?)
* "Four out of five people would agree..." (How many subjects were included in the study?)
* "... is among the (top, leading, best, few, worst, etc.)" (Top 100? Best in customer service/quality/management?)
* "...for a fraction of the original price!" (This wording suggests a much lower price even though the fraction could easily be 99/100)
* "More people are using..." (What does that mean in numbers?)
* "This product helps fight the signs of aging" (helps make you think it is the cure)

Articles and books

In "Report on Unidentified Flying Objects" (1956), U.S. Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt described astronomer Dr. J. Allen Hynek's report on the death of Air Force Pilot Thomas Mantell in pursuit of a UFO as "a masterpiece in the art of 'weasel wording'." [ [http://www.nicap.org/rufo/rufo-03.htm Report on Unidentified Flying Objects] ]

Carl Wrighter discussed weasel words in his book "I Can Sell You Anything" (1972).

Australian author Don Watson collected two volumes ("Death Sentence" and "Watson's Dictionary of Weasel Words") documenting the increasing use of weasel words in government and corporate language. He maintains a website [Examples and discussion of [http://www.weaselwords.com.au weasel words] ] encouraging people to identify and nominate examples of weasel words.

See also

* Essentially contested concept
* Glittering generality
* Newspeak
* Peacock words
* Political correctness
* Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
* Wooden language

References

External links

* [http://home1.gte.net/res1bup4/euphemism.htm Weasel Words and Other Perversions of the Language]
* [http://www.weaselwords.com.au/index3.htm weaselwords.com.au]