- Underground (documentary film)
Infobox_Film
name = Underground
|thumb image_size = 200px caption =
imdb_id = 0075367
writer =
starring =Bill Ayers
Kathy Boudin
Emile de Antonio
Bernadine Dohrn
Jeff Jones
Mary Lampson
Haskell Wexler
Kathy Wilkerson
directors =Emile de Antonio Mary Lampson Haskell Wexler
editors =Emile de Antonio Mary Lampson | cinematographer =Haskell Wexler
distributor = [http://www.sphinxproductions.com/pages/film_antoniofilms.html Sphinx Productions]
released = 1976
runtime = 87 minutes
language = English
country = USA
budget ="Underground" is a 1976
documentary film about the Weathermen, the militant faction of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) who fought to overthrow theU.S. government during the 1960’s and 1970’s. The film consists of interviews with members of the group after they were forced underground and footage of the anti-war and civil rights protests during this time period. It was directed byEmile de Antonio ,Haskell Wexler andMary Lampson , who were subpoenaed by theFederal Bureau of Investigation in an attempt to confiscate the film footage in order to gain information that would help them arrest the Weathermen.Overview
"Underground" combines interviews with and archival footage of the Weathermen to provide a picture of this group, their opinions on American society, and their hopes for the future. The filmmakers use the material from their interactions with the Weathermen
Bill Ayers ,Kathy Boudin ,Bernadine Dohrn ,Jeff Jones andCathy Wilkerson to structure its exploration of the formation and direction of the group. The film begins by presenting images and words that describe the Weathermen’s process of being radicalized in the 1960’s through theCivil Rights Movement , theanti-war movement , andcommunist revolutionary struggles inCuba ,Russia andChina , as well as historical struggles in theUnited States over Native American Rights and labor issues. The film moves on to discuss the Weathermen’s analysis of American society, addressing those who have inspired them, and further explaining the reasons behind their militancy, while also introducing the issue of tactics. The final section of the film addresses the group’s use of property destruction as a way to bring about change and destabilize the current, and in their view, corrupt system. They state that “no revolution can take place successfully without an armed confrontation with the state.” While the radicals themselves are reluctant to discuss the specifics of their bombings due to their unstable position as underground fugitives, the filmmakers provide us with a list of actions which they have undertaken, thus showing the scope of these American revolutionaries. "Underground" provides an intimate look at the inner workings of the Weather Underground, and we see their discomfort with being filmed, their strong internal collective identity, and their isolation from society at large. The filmmakers do not use the interviews and juxtaposed images to promote the group or support their actions, and it is apparent that their motives for the film differ from those of the subjects that they are presenting. In the end this film provides an unprecedented look at how a bunch of middle-class Americans became militant revolutionaries, raising questions not only about the merits of their struggle, but also about past and future radical actions.Historical context
This film is informed by the political and social unrest of the 1960’s in the
United States . Thecivil rights movement ,Vietnam War (and subsequentanti-war movement ),McCarthyism , unemployment and urban decay, and liberation struggles across many nations not only played into the creation of the Weather Underground, but also were a significant factor inEmile de Antonio ’s decision to use them as the focus of his film. It was made in 1975, following the group’s involvement in bombingThe Pentagon , and an accident at theirGreenwich Village townhouse in which a bomb exploded prematurely, killing three Weathermen and driving the rest underground.Emile de Antonio attributes his decision to make this film to his own Marxist beliefs, his fascination with the political climate of the 60s and 70s, and his specific interest in the Weather Underground after reading their manifestoPrairie Fire (Rosenthal 1978). He made contact with the group, and after gaining their consent to take part in the project enlistedMary Lampson (with whom he had worked in the past), andHaskell Wexler (an established cinematographer with leftist sympathies). The three raised the money and put the film together themselves. The Weathermen agreed to participate on the condition that the filmmakers would not contact them again after the film’s completion (Paletz 1977).tyle
The situation of the Weather Underground as wanted fugitives of the
FBI necessitated the filmmakers to employ an unconventional style in conducting their interviews. The footage was filmed in only three days, andWexler shot the Weathermen from behind or through a screen in order to conceal their individual identities. The film is unique in that the viewer is able to see the filmmakers but not the subjects themselves. The interactions between the Weathermen and filmmakers raise many questions about the role ofdocumentary film and the contrived nature of its set-ups. This is apparent at several points in the film where the Weathermen express concern over the filmmakers catching their faces on camera, or complain about the artificiality of the overall conversation taking place. In fact, de Antonio describes going out and burning a pile of possible incriminating film negatives following the filming (Rosenthal 1978). The collective nature of the group led the filmmakers to use group interviews, and allow individuals to talk at length about their thoughts on the American social and political climate, as well as their role in this situation and bringing about change. Unlike many documentaries that actively probe interviewees, the directors of Underground instead sit back and allow the Weathermen to speak. While they do interrupt at times, and do provoke the group with probing questions, there is a recognition of the unstable position of the people they are working with, which, in the end, results in their stepping back and letting the group express itself on its own terms. This film uses the voices of the Weathermen as narration, while employing mainly archival footage to create juxtapositions that illustrate the words. As in his other films, de Antonio purchased the rights to use images from a number of other prominent radical documentaries includingGray and Alk ’s "The Murder of Fred Hamption ",Chris Marker ’s film on the "Armies of the Night " Pentagon demonstrations,Cinda Firestone ’s "Attica ", Wexler-Fonda-Hayden’s "Introduction to the Enemy ", and his own "In the Year of the Pig " (Waugh 1976).Response
In 1975, after
Emile de Antonio ,Mary Lampson andHaskell Wexler had completed filming for "Underground", theFBI learned of their project and served all three with subpoenas in an attempt to confiscate their material in order to gain information about the location of the Weathermen that might lead to their arrest. The three, all prominent within theHollywood community, hired the best lawyers that they could find, and with the support of other filmmakers and actors, includingElia Kazan ,Shirley MacLaine ,Jack Nicholson andWarren Beatty , were able to get the subpoenas repealed (Hess 1975). The three were able to use theirFirst Amendment rights to freedom of speech, as well as the rights ofjournalistic integrity which allow for confidentiality of sources, to fight the courts and retain the right to make the film (Hess 1975; Waugh 1976; Jackson 2004). While the legal matters surrounding the production of "Underground" gained it extensive media coverage, it received mixed reviews from critics, with most critiquing the Weather Underground on the basis of its tactics, rather than addressing the style or merits of the film itself. Others criticized the film for being boring, relying too heavily on narrative by the Weathermen to hold it together, yet others praised it for its striking juxtapositions and its role as a history of the situation and motivations of the radical left (Waugh 1976). Reviews aside, the film is, to this day, difficult to obtain, but, in the words of de Antonio, is significant because “…a film always captures history at 24 frames per second and that is it” (Rosenthal 1978).Bibliography
Cold War Chronicles: The Films of Emile de Antonio. (2004) Harvard Film Archive. [http://www.harvardfilmarchive.org/calendars/04_fall/deantonio.html]
Hess, J. (1975) U.S. political filmmaking: 2 stories. Jump Cut. 8 pp. 23-25 [http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/JC08folder/PoliticalFilmmaking.html]
Jackson, B. (2004) Conversations with Emile de Antonio. Senses of Cinema. [http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/04/31/emile_de_antonio.html]
Paletz, D. (1977) Underground (Emile de Antonio; Haskell Wexler; Mary Lampson). Film Quarterly. 30(4) pp. 34-37.
Rosenthal, A.; de Antonio, E. (1978) Emile de Antonio: An Interview. Film Quarterly. 32(1) pp. 4-17
Waugh, T. (1976) Underground: Weather People at Home. Jump Cut. 12/13 pp. 11-13 [http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/jc12-13folder/underground.waugh.html]
ee also
*
Weatherman (organization) External links
*imdb title|id=0075367|title=Underground
* [http://www.sphinxproductions.com/pages/film_antoniofilms.html Films of Emile de Antonio distributed by Sphinx Productions ]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.