- Immaculate Reception
The Immaculate Reception is the nickname given to one of the most famous plays in the history of
American football . It occurred in the AFC divisional playoff game between thePittsburgh Steelers and theOakland Raiders atThree Rivers Stadium inPittsburgh, Pennsylvania , onDecember 23 ,1972 .NFL Films has chosen it as the greatest play of all time, as well as the most controversial. ["NFL Top 10 - Controversial Calls"] The play was a turning point for the Steelers, who reversed four decades of futility with their first playoff win ever, and went on to win four Super Bowls by the end of the decade. The play's name is aneologism derived from theImmaculate Conception , adogma in theRoman Catholic Church that Mary, mother of Jesus, when conceived by her parents, bore no stain oforiginal sin . The phrase was first used on air byMyron Cope , a Pittsburgh sportscaster who was reporting on the Steelers' victory. A Pittsburgh woman, Sharon Levosky, called Cope the night of the game and suggested the name, which was coined by her friend Michael Ord. Cope used the term on television and the phrase stuck. The term was apparently meant to imply that the play was miraculous or divine in nature (seeHail Mary pass for a similar term), though "immaculate" means "clean" or "pure." [ [http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/immaculate immaculate - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary ] ]How it happened
After Raiders quarterback
Ken Stabler scored a touchdown on a 30-yard run with 1:17 left to go, thePittsburgh Steelers trailed theOakland Raiders 7-6, facing fourth-and-10 on their own 40-yard line with 22 seconds remaining in the game and no time-outs. Head coachChuck Noll called a pass play, 66 Circle Option, intended for receiverBarry Pearson [cite web|url=http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/threerivers/reception.html|title=The house that the 'Immaculate Reception' built|accessdate=2006-10-03|date=2000
publisher=The Sporting News ] , a rookie who was playing in his first NFL game. Steelersquarterback Terry Bradshaw , unable to find Pearson while avoiding two Raiders defenders, threw the ball to the Raiders' 35-yard line, toward fullback John "Frenchy" Fuqua. Raiders safetyJack Tatum collided with Fuqua just as the ball arrived. Tatum's hit knocked Fuqua to the ground and sent the ball sailing backward several yards, end over end. Steelers running backFranco Harris , after initially blocking on the play, had run downfield in case Bradshaw needed another eligible receiver. He scooped up the sailing ball just before it hit the ground, and ran the rest of the way downfield to score the touchdown that gave the Steelers a 12-7 lead and the game [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnfbKKvUG9Q&mode=related&search=] .Controversy
The critical question was: off whom did the ball bounce in the Fuqua/Tatum collision? If it bounced off Fuqua, and then Harris was the next to touch the ball, the reception was illegal since two offensive players could not touch a pass in succession (a rule that was changed in
1978 ). If the reception was illegal, the Raiders would have gained possession (via a turnover on downs), clinching a victory. If the ball bounced off Tatum, or if it bounced off Fuqua and then Tatum, the reception was legal, as a defensive player was the last to touch the ball.One official, Back Judge
Adrian Burk , signaled that the play was a touchdown, but the other game officials did not immediately make any signal. [ [http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/threerivers/reception.html The Sporting News: Three Rivers Stadium ] ] There was noinstant replay rule at the time. RefereeFred Swearingen telephoned the NFL's supervisor of officials,Art McNally , who was sitting in the press box, after which he signaled a touchdown. Although this has been described as the first known use of television replay to confirm a call, [ [http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=tvmoments/060321 ESPN.com: Page 2 : Great moments, great TV ] ] [ [http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/sports/year_in_sports/12.23.html The New York Times: This Day In Sports ] ] at the time the NFL denied that the decision was made in the press box or using a television replay. ["TV or Not TV?", New York Times, December 24, 1972.] It was later said that Swearingen was scared of backlash from the Steelers fans if he had ruled the other way. Fans immediately rushed the field, and it took 15 minutes to clear them so the point-after, or conversion, could be kicked to give the Steelers what turned out to be their final margin of victory, 13-7.The play is still disputed by those involved, particularly by living personnel from the Raiders and their fans, who insist the Raiders should have won. Tatum said at the time, and has maintained ever since, that the ball did not bounce off him. [ [http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/sports/year_in_sports/12.23.html The New York Times: This Day In Sports ] ] [ [http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/threerivers/reception.html The Sporting News: Three Rivers Stadium ] ] Raiders linebacker
Phil Villapiano , who was covering Harris at the time, also maintains that the ball hit Fuqua. [ [http://www.thesuper70s.com/excerpt1.html The Super '70s : Memories from Pro Football's Greatest Era ] ] Fuqua has been coy, supposedly saying he knows exactly what happened that day but will never tell. [ [http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs98/news/1999/990106/01030879.html ESPN.com: Two words say it all: 'Immaculate Reception' ] ] John Madden, coach of the 1972 Raiders, has said that he will never get over the play, and has indicated that he's bothered more by the delay between the end of the play and the final signal of touchdown, than by which player the ball truly hit. After the game he indicated that from his view the football had indeed touched Tatum. [ [http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/sports/year_in_sports/12.23.html The New York Times: This Day In Sports ] ]In 1998, during halftime of the AFC Championship game, NBC showed a replay from its original broadcast. The replay presented a different angle than the NFL Films clip that is most often shown. According to a writer for the New York Daily News, "NBC's replay showed the ball clearly hit one and only one man [:] Oakland DB Jack Tatum." [Raissman, Bob, "With NFL, Networks Can't Win for Losing," New York Daily News, January 13, 1998, p.57.]
Pittsburgh sportscaster
Myron Cope , in a 1997 article [ [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE5D9173EF932A15751C1A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all Backtalk; AN IMMACULATE EXPLANATION OF THE TRUTH - New York Times ] ] and in his 2002 book "Double Yoi!", relates that two days after the game he reviewed film taken by local Pittsburgh TV stationWTAE , and that the film showed " [n] o question about it -- Bradshaw's pass struck Tatum squarely on his right shoulder." Cope states that the local film would be next to impossible to find again, because of inadequate filing procedures.In 2004 John Fetkovich, an emeritus professor of physics at
Carnegie Mellon University , analyzed the NFL Films clip of the play. He came to the conclusion, based the trajectory of the bounced ball and conservation of momentum, that the ball must have bounced off of Tatum, who was running upfield at the time, rather than Fuqua, who was running across and down the field. [ [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04292/397451.stm The physics of the matter say the Immaculate Reception ball hit Tatum ] ] Timothy Gay, a physics professor and a longtime fan of the Raiders, [ [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04278/389980.stm Pigskin physics and the Immaculate Reception ] ] cited Fetkovich's work with approval in his book "The Physics of Football," and concluded that "the referees made the right call in the Immaculate Reception."Another widely held point of contention to the play was whether or not the ball had hit the ground before Harris snatched it and ran with it. The sideline views of both film and video gave no answer, as Harris had caught the ball out of frame, and came running into frame from the right side on his path to the end zone. The only other known NBC video was an end zone shot from above and behind the goalposts and, in keeping with the mystery of the play, one of the posts was exactly in the line of sight of Harris' hands and the ball. The best NFL Films shot of the play, from ground level, which is probably the most-often seen clip (along with audio of an excited
Jack Flemming , the Steelers' radio announcer at the time) is a tight shot from the end zone of Harris snaring the ball, with his feet and the ground just out of frame below.Villapiano has also stated that he was illegally blocked by Steelers tight end
John McMakin just as he was about to tackle Harris following the reception. [ [http://www.thesuper70s.com/excerpt1.html The Super '70s : Memories from Pro Football's Greatest Era ] ] [ [http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/threerivers/reception.html The Sporting News: Three Rivers Stadium ] ]Aftermath of the play
The week after this playoff victory, the Steelers lost the AFC championship game to the
Miami Dolphins 21-17, [ [http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/1972.htm 1972 NFL Standings, Team & Offensive Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com ] ] who would then winSuper Bowl VII in their landmark undefeated season. The Steelers, however, would reverse four decades of futility and go on to become a dominant force in the NFL for the subsequent decade, winning fourSuper Bowl s with such stars as Bradshaw, Harris,John Stallworth , andLynn Swann and theSteel Curtain defense led byJack Ham , Jack Lambert, "Mean Joe" Greene,Mel Blount , andDwight White .1972 was the team's 40th year in the league, during which they had finished above .500 only nine times, and until then had never won a playoff game. In fact, before this game the only playoff game the team had ever played in was a loss to the
Philadelphia Eagles in 1947 after the two teams finished tied for theNFL Eastern Division championship. (The Steelers also lost to theDetroit Lions in the 1962Playoff Bowl , though this was considered anexhibition game between the two second place teams in league record books and not an actual playoff game.) They had long been regarded as one of the league's doormats (literally, as the 1944 Card-Pitt merger was 0-10 and was ridiculed as the "Carpitts," a play on the word "carpet"). As recently as 1969 the team had posted a 1-13 record, thus securing the first draft choice in the subsequent NFL draft (in which the Steelers chose Terry Bradshaw) and seeding their remarkable turnaround. Since theAFL-NFL Merger , the Steelers have the NFL's winningest record (surpassing Miami in 2007 because of the Dolphins recent struggles), have had a league-low three head coaches, and have had only nine losing seasons, none worse than 5-11. Only twice since the Immaculate Reception has the team had losing seasons two years in a row and none three years in a row.The Immaculate Reception spawned a heated rivalry between the Steelers and Raiders, a rivalry that was at its peak during the 1970s, when both teams were among the best in the league and both were known for their hard-hitting, physical play. The teams met in the playoffs in each of the next four seasons, starting with the Raiders' 33-14 victory in the 1973 divisional playoffs. Pittsburgh would use AFC championship game victories over Oakland (24-13 at Oakland in 1974 and 16-10 at Pittsburgh in 1975) as a springboard to victories in
Super Bowl IX andSuper Bowl X , before the Raiders notched a 24-7 victory at home in 1976 on their way to winningSuper Bowl XI . The two last met in the playoffs in 1983 when the eventual Super Bowl champion Raiders crushed the Steelers 38-10. The rivalry has since died down considerably in recent years, mainly because of the Raiders' recent descent into being among the NFL's worst teams, though the matchups still garner attention.The play itself would start another, rather unique rivalry between the Raiders and the rest of the league, as Oakland fans have long thought that the league has wanted to screw the Raiders (and specifically
Al Davis ) over.NFL Network in 2007 ranked the "Raiders versus the World" as the biggest feud in NFL history ["NFL Top 10 - Biggest Feuds"] .For the
1978 NFL season , the rule in question regarding the forward pass was repealed. There are no longer any restrictions on any deflections of passes.See also
*
NFL playoffs, 1972-73
*The Play
*Eli Manning pass to David Tyree
*The Catch (American football)
*Pittsburgh Sports Lore
*Music City Miracle References
* [http://mondesishouse.blogspot.com/2006/09/immaculate-reception-ranked-1-by-fox.html Mondesi's House - Immaculate Reception Ranked #1 by Fox]
Mondesi's House September 26, 2006
* [http://www.steelersfever.com/immaculate_reception.html Steelers Fever - Immaculate Reception] (Last accessed September 19, 2006)
* " [http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs98/news/1999/990106/01030879.html Two words say it all: 'Immaculate Reception'] " ESPN.com (Last accessed September 19, 2006)External links
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnfbKKvUG9Q Video of the play]
* [http://greatsportsrivalries.com/pittssteelers/ir_1972.html Images of the play]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.