Rocket engine nozzle

A rocket engine nozzle is a propelling nozzle usually of the de Laval type used in a rocket engine to expand and accelerate the combustion gases, from burning propellants, so that the exhaust gases exit the nozzle at hypersonic velocities.

History

The de Laval nozzle was first used in an early rocket engine developed by Robert Goddard, one of the fathers of modern rocketry. Subsequently, almost all rocket engines used this idea, including Walter Thiel's implementation which made possible Germany's V2 rocket.

Atmospheric use

The optimal size of a rocket engine nozzle to be used within the atmosphere is when the exit pressure equals ambient pressure, which decreases with altitude. For rockets travelling from the Earth to orbit, a simple nozzle design is only optimal at one altitude, losing efficiency and wasting fuel at other altitudes.

If the pressure of the jet leaving the nozzle is above ambient pressure then a nozzle is said to be 'underexpanded'; if the jet is below ambient pressure then it is 'overexpanded'.

Slight overexpansion causes a slight reduction in efficiency, but otherwise does little harm. However, if the jet pressure is approximately 2.5 times lower than ambient then 'flow separation' occurs. This can cause jet instabilities that can cause damage to the nozzle or simply cause control difficulties of the vehicle or the engine.

In some cases it is desirable for reliability and safety reasons to ignite a rocket engine on the ground that will be used all the way to orbit. In most cases the optimal pressure is ambient, however if most of the thrust comes from (ambient pressure) boosters at takeoff, then the trades push to using an overexpanded nozzle. This is the technique used on the Space shuttle's main engines.

Vacuum use

For nozzles that are used in vacuum or at very high altitude, it is impossible to match ambient pressure and rather larger area ratio nozzles are usually more efficient. However, a very long nozzle has significant mass and a length that optimises overall vehicle performance can always be found. Additionally, as the temperature of the gas in the nozzle decreases some components of the exhaust gases (such as water vapour from the combustion process) may liquefy or even freeze. This is highly undesirable and needs to be avoided.

Magnetic nozzles have been proposed for some types of propulsion (for example VASIMR), in which the flow of plasma or ions are directed by magnetic fields instead of walls made of solid materials. These can be advantageous since a magnetic field itself cannot melt and the plasma can be at millions of kelvins. But there are often thermal problems in the coils, particularly if superconducting coils are used to form the throat and expansion fields.

1-D Analysis of gas flow in rocket engine nozzles

(Main Article: De Laval nozzle)

The analysis of gas flow through de Laval nozzles involves a number of concepts and assumptions:

* For simplicity, the combustion gas is assumed to be an ideal gas.
* The gas flow is isentropic (i.e., at constant entropy), frictionless, and adiabatic (i.e., there is little or no heat gained or lost)
* The gas flow is constant (i.e., steady) during the period of the propellant burn.
* The gas flow is along a straight line from gas inlet to exhaust gas exit (i.e., along the nozzle's axis of symmetry)
* The gas flow behavior is compressible since the flow is at very high velocities.

As the combustion gas enters the rocket nozzle, it is traveling at subsonic velocities. As the throat contracts down the gas is forced to accelerate until at the nozzle throat, where the cross-sectional area is the smallest, the linear velocity becomes sonic. From the throat the cross-sectional area then increases, the gas expands and the linear velocity becomes progressively more supersonic.

The linear velocity of the exiting exhaust gases can be calculated using the following equation [http://members.aol.com/ricnakk/th_nozz.html Richard Nakka's Equation 12] ] [http://www.braeunig.us/space/propuls.htm#intro Robert Braeuning's Equation 2.22] ] [cite book|author=Sutton, George P.|title=Rocket Propulsion Elements: An Introduction to the Engineering of Rockets|edition=6th Edition|pages=636|publisher=Wiley-Interscience|year=1992|id=ISBN 0471529389]

:

In certain cases, where $P\_e$ equals $P\_o$, then:

:$I\_\{sp\}\; =,\; frac\{F\}\{dot\{m\},g\_o\},=,\; frac\{dot\{m\},V\_\{e\{dot\{m\},g\_o\},=,frac\{V\_\{e\{g\_o\}$

In cases where this may not be the case since for a rocket nozzle $P\_e$ is proportional to $dot\{m\}$, then it is possible to define a constant quantity which is the vacuum $I\_\{sp\}(vac)$ for any given engine thus:

:$I\_\{sp\}(vac)\; =,frac\{V\_e\}\{g\_o\}\; +\; frac\{P\_e,A\_e\}\{dot\{m\},g\_o\}$

and hence::$F\; =\; I\_\{sp\}(vac),g\_o,dot\{m\}\; -\; A\_e\; P\_o$

which is simply the vacuum thrust minus the force of the ambient atmospheric pressure acting over the exit plane.

Essentially then, for rocket nozzles, the ambient pressure acting over the engine largely cancels but effectively acts over the exit plane of the rocket engine in a rearward direction, while the exhaust jet generates forward thrust.

Aerostatic back-pressure and optimum expansion

As the gas travels down the expansion part of the nozzle the pressure and temperature decreases and the speed of the gas increases.

The supersonic nature of the exhaust jet means that the pressure of the exhaust can be significantly different from ambient pressure- the outside air is unable to equalize the pressure upstream due to the very high jet velocity. Therefore, for supersonic nozzles, it is actually possible for the pressure of the gas exiting the nozzle to go significantly below or very greatly above ambient pressure.

If the exit pressure is too low, then the jet can separate from the nozzle. This is often unstable and the jet will generally cause large off-axis thrusts, and may mechanically damage the nozzle.

This separation generally occurs if the exit pressure goes below roughly 30-45% of ambient, but may be delayed to far lower pressures if the nozzle is designed to increase the pressure at the rim, as is achieved with the SSME (1-2 psi at 15 psi ambient).

In addition, as the rocket engine starts up or throttles, the chamber pressure varies and this generates different levels of efficiency. At low chamber pressures the engine is almost inevitably going to be grossly over-expanded.

Optimum shape

The ratio of the area of the narrowest part of the nozzle to the exit plane area is mainly what determines how efficiently the expansion of the exhaust gases is converted into linear velocity; the exhaust velocity and therefore the thrust of the rocket engine, although the gas properties have an effect as well.

The shape of the nozzle also modestly affects how efficiently the expansion of the exhaust gases is converted into linear motion. The simplest nozzle shape is a ~12 degree internal angle cone, which is about 97% efficient. Smaller angles give very slightly higher efficiency, larger angles give lower efficiency.

More complex shapes of revolution are frequently used, such as Bell nozzles or parabolic shapes. This gives perhaps 1% higher efficiency than the cone nozzle, and is shorter and lighter. These shapes are widely used on launch vehicles and other rockets where weight is at a premium. They are of course, harder to fabricate, so are typically more costly.

There is also a theoretical optimum nozzle shape for maximum exhaust speed, however, a shorter bell shape is typically used which gives better overall performance due to its much lower weight, shorter length, lower drag losses, and only very marginally lower exhaust speed. [http://www.engineeringatboeing.com/articles/nozzledesign.htm PWR Engineering: Nozzle Design] ]

Other things also very modestly affect the efficiency of a rocket nozzle, it's important that the throat be a smooth radius, the angle of the narrowing down to the throat also has a very slight affect on the overall efficiency, but this is small. The exit of the nozzle needs to be as sharp as possible to minimize the chances of separation problems at low exit pressures.

Advanced designs

A number of more sophisticated designs have been proposed, such as the plug nozzle, expanding nozzle, Stepped nozzles and the aerospike nozzle each of which adapt in some way to changing ambient pressure. There is also a SERN (Single Expansion Ramp Nozzle), a linear expansion nozzle where the gas pressure transfers work only on one side and which could be described as a single-sided aerospike nozzle.

ee also

*Choked flow - when the gas speeds reaches the speed of sound in the gas
*de Laval nozzle - a convergent-divergent nozzle designed to give supersonic speeds
*Dual-thrust rocket motors
*Jet engine - engines propelled by jets (including rockets)
*Merlin (rocket engine)
*Multistage rocket
*NK-33 - Russian rocket engine
*Pulse jet engine
*Pulsed rocket motor
*Rocket - rocket vehicles
*Rocket engines - used to propel rocket vehicles
*SERN, Single-expansion ramp nozzle - a non-axisymmetric aerospike
*Shock diamonds - these visible bands form in the exhaust of rocket engines
*Solid rocket
*Spacecraft propulsion
*Specific impulse - a measure of exhaust speed
*Staged combustion cycle (rocket) - a type of rocket engine

References

External links

* [http://www.nasa.gov/home/index.htm NASA web site]
* [http://trs.nis.nasa.gov/archive/00000186/01/sp8120.pdf NASA Space Vehicle Design Criteria, Liquid Rocket Engine Nozzles]
* [http://exploration.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/ NASA's "Beginners' Guide to Rockets"]
* [http://www.aerospaceweb.org/design/aerospike/main.shtml The Aerospike Engine]
* [http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/ Richard Nakka's Experimental Rocketry Web Site]
* [http://www.braeunig.us/space/propuls.htm#intro "Rocket Propulsion" on Robert Braeuning's Web Site]

Machine configurations|state=uncollapsed