- Khaled Qasim
Infobox WoT detainees
subject_name = Khaled Qasim
image_size =
image_caption =
date_of_birth = Birth date|1977|1|21
place_of_birth = Themeir, Yemen
date_of_death =
place_of_death =
detained_at = Guantanamo
id_number = 242
group =
alias =
charge = no charge, held inextrajudicial detention
penalty =
status =
occupation =
spouse =
parents =
children =Khaled Qasim is a
Yemen i citizen who was captured inAfghanistan and detained in theUnited States Guantanamo Bay Naval Base , inCuba .cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/news/May2006/d20060515%20List.pdf
title=List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through May 15, 2006
author=OARDEC
publisher=United States Department of Defense
date=May 15 2006
accessdate=2007-09-29
format=PDF] Qasim's Guantanamo detainee ID number is 242.Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terrorism analysts reports that Qasim was born onJanuary 21 1977 , in Themeir, Yemen.Combatant Status Review Tribunal
Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the
Geneva Conventions to captives fromthe war on terror . This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct acompetent tribunal s to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections ofprisoner of war status. Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted theCombatant Status Review Tribunal s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were "lawful combatants" -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of anenemy combatant .Qasim declined to participate in his
Combatant Status Review Tribunal . [http://wid.ap.org/documents/detainees/khaledqasim.pdf documents (.pdf)] , fromKhaled Qasim 'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal ]Allegations
The allegations Qasem would have faced during his Combatant Status Review Tribunal were.:""'a The detainee is a member of al Qaida and is associated with the
Taliban .:#"Detainee is a Yemeni citizen who traveled to Afghanistan in late 1999.:#"Detainee twice trained at theAl Farouq training camp .:#"At Al Farouq Detainee received training on the Kalashnikov rifle; M-16;PK machine gun ; RPGs;hand grenade s explosives and advanced tactical training.:#"BeforeSeptember 11, 2001 , Detainee traveled to the front lines of Afghanistan to fight against the Northern Alliance.:#"Detainee approached aTaliban representative and requested to join the Taliban.:#"Detainee’s brother was apprehended by Yemeni authorities in connection with the bombing of theUSS Cole (DDG-67) .:""'b The detainee participated in military operations against the coalition.:#"Detainee was present inTora Bora , with other al Qaida fighters duringRamadan , 2001, (Ramadan began onNovember 15 2001 ).:#"While in Tora Bora, Detainee and his associates were addressed by Usama Bin Laden.:#"Detainee was captured by a localPashtun tribe in the Tora Bora region.Personal Representative's report on his sessions with Qasim
The detainees Personal Representative reported that Qasim had told him he had been tortured in Afghanistan by his Afghan captors. He said his Afghan captors threatened to retaliate against him if he deviated from the story they told him to tell the Americans.
Initially he said he had told the Americans the story his Afghan captors had coached him to tell. He said he had stopped talking to his American interrogators when they started torturing him too.
He acknowledged coming from Yemen. He denied being trained at Al Farouq or any other camp. He said he spent all his time in Afghanistan living in a guesthouse, and had never been near the front lines. He denied ever being approached by the Taliban, and that if he had he would not have been able to understand them because he does not speak their language.
He said it was his brother who was apprehended for a role in the bombing of the Cole, but that he had nothing to do with the attack.
He denied ever participating in hostilities.
He acknowledged being present in Tora Bora, but claimed he did not know the people there were al Qaida.
He acknowledged that he had been addressed by Usama bin Laden – but it was merely a passing greeting.
When asked why he had spent so long in Afghanistan he said he was fleeing violence and mistreatment from
India n authorities. He said he was planning to go home, when the Cole was attacked. The attack threw suspicion on anyone returning from Afghanistan. Things were calming down, and he was starting to think it might be saife, when al Qaeda attacked theWorld Trade Center .Personal Representative's retraction of hearing torture allegations
The Tribunal reconvened to give the Personal Representative an opportunity to amend what he has said before. On second thought he realized that the detainee had not said he was tortured by Americans. He said he heard other detainees crying at night.
He also amended his earlier account, and said that Qasim had not said he was tortured in Afghanistan, only that he had been mistreated.
Personal Representative's final clarification over Qasim's torture claims
The Tribunal reconvened a second time, to ask for clarification on the torture question, because the detainee’s statement did say he was tortured. During the final convening of Qasim’s Tribunal his Personal Representative said that Qasim had claimed torture, and had only changed his story when the Personal Representative went back to clarify the details following the first meeting of his Tribunal.
Administrative Review Board hearing
Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual
Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.