- Comparison between U.S. states and countries nominal GDP
This is a comparison between US states and countries' nominal Gross Domestic Product. Many of the states of the
United States have largeGross Domestic Product (calledgross state product ) which would rank highly on a list of countries world GDP. For instance,California would have the 7th highest GDP in the world if thought of as a country (not including the US as a whole, if so, it would be 8th). Even the lowest ranked US state,Vermont , would still be 74th out of some 200 countries.These figures are based on the
International Monetary Fund list onList of countries by GDP (nominal) for world GDP, and theList of U.S. states by GDP (nominal) figures.Note: The US is not counted as a whole in the overall rank because this would be double counting since the states of the US are being compared to other countries.
Note: These figures are calculated using exchange rate conversions, and exchange rates fluctuate from year to year. While they are not perfect, it is better to use
Purchasing Power Parity estimates of currency conversions in making comparisons of this kind.2007
2004
ee also
*
Comparison between U.S. states and countries by GDP (PPP)
*List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita - GDP at market or government official exchange rates per inhabitant
*List of countries by GDP (PPP) - GDP calculated atpurchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates
*List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - GDP at purchasing power parity exchange rates per inhabitant
*List of countries by past GDP (nominal) - for the years between1998 and2003
*List of countries by past GDP (PPP) - for the periods between 1 AD and 1998 AD
*List of countries by future GDP estimates (nominal) - for the years2006 and2007 External links
* [http://www.bea.gov/bea/newsrel/gspnewsrelease.htm News release on 2005 gross state product] , US
Bureau of Economic Analysis ,October 26 ,2006
* [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/01/data/dbcoutm.cfm?SD=2005&ED=2005&R1=1&R2=1&CS=3&SS=2&OS=C&DD=0&OUT=1&C=512-941-914-446-612-666-614-672-311-946-213-137-911-962-193-674-122-676-912-548-313-556-419-678-513-181-316-682-913-684-124-273-339-921-638-948-514-686-218-688-963-518-616-728-223-558-516-138-918-353-748-196-618-278-522-692-622-694-156-142-624-449-626-564-628-283-228-853-924-288-233-293-632-566-636-964-634-182-238-453-662-968-960-922-423-714-935-862-128-716-611-456-321-722-243-965-248-718-469-724-253-576-642-936-643-961-939-813-644-199-819-184-172-524-132-361-646-362-648-364-915-732-134-366-652-734-174-144-328-146-258-463-656-528-654-923-336-738-263-578-268-537-532-742-944-866-176-369-534-744-536-186-429-925-178-746-436-926-136-466-343-112-158-111-439-298-916-927-664-846-826-299-542-582-443-474-917-754-544-698&S=NGDPD&CMP=0&x=31&y=8 World Economic Outlook Database] ,International Monetary Fund (IMF), April 2006
* [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/01/data/dbaoutm.cfm?SD=2005&ED=2005&R1=1&R2=1&CS=5&SS=2&OS=C&DD=0&OUT=1&C=001-998&S=NGDPD&CMP=0&x=60&y=9 World and EU (World Economic Outlook Database)] IMF, April 2006
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.