- The Whole Family
Infobox Book |
name = The Whole Family
image_caption = 2001 Duke University Press edition cover
author = Various
language = English
Harper & Brothers
release_date = October 15, 1908
media_type = Print (Serial)
pages = 317 pp
isbn = NA
"The Whole Family: a Novel by Twelve Authors" (1908) is a collaborative
noveltold in twelve chapters, each by a different author. This unusual project was conceived by novelist William Dean Howellsand carried out under the direction of " Harper's Bazaar" editor Elizabeth Jordan, who (like Howells) would write one of the chapters herself. Howells' idea for the novel was to show how an engagement or marriage would affect and be affected by an entire family. The project became somewhat curious for the way the authors' contentious interrelationships mirrored the sometimes dysfunctional family they described in their chapters. Howells had hoped Mark Twainwould be one of the authors, but Twain did not participate. Other than Howells himself, Henry Jameswas probably the best-known author to participate. The novel was serialized in "Harper's Bazaar" in 1907-08 and published as a book by Harpers in late 1908.
The chapters and their authors
#"The Father" by
William Dean Howells
#"The Old-Maid Aunt" by
Mary E. Wilkins Freeman
#"The Grandmother" by
Mary Heaton Vorse
#"The Daughter-in-Law" by
Mary Stewart Cutting
#"The School-Girl" by Elizabeth Jordan
#"The Son-in-Law" by
John Kendrick Bangs
#"The Married Son" by
#"The Married Daughter" by
Elizabeth Stuart Phelps
#"The Mother" by
#"The School-Boy" by
Mary Raymond Shipman Andrews
#"Peggy" by Alice Brown
#"The Friend of the Family" by
Henry Van Dyke
In the rather pedestrian opening chapter Howells introduces the Talbert family,
middle-class New Englandproprietors of a silverplate works that turns out ice-pitchers and other mundane household items. Daughter Peggy Talbert has just returned from her coeducational collegeengaged to a harmless but rather weak young man named Harry Goward.
It was Howells' intention that each of the eleven subsequent authors would examine the impact of Peggy's engagement on a different member of the Talbert family. But the very next chapter, by Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, immediately sent the novel careening off Howell's intended trajectory. Freeman made her assigned character, the "old-maid aunt" Elizabeth Talbert, into anything but a quiet old spinster. Instead she created Aunt Elizabeth as an older but vibrant and sexually attractive woman who doesn't mind getting noticed by Peggy's fiancee.
This was, as project editor Elizabeth Jordan later wote, the "explosion of a bombshell on our literary hearthstone." Howells, never particularly comfortable with frank sexuality, recoiled from Freeman's spicy conception of a character he had intended as a harmless old lady. Contributor Henry Van Dyke, who would eventually write the concluding chapter, reacted in a half-humorous, half-worried letter to Jordan:
:Heavens! What a catastrophe! Who would have thought that the old maiden aunt would go mad in the second chapter? Poor lady. Red hair and a pink hat and boys in beau knots all over the costume. What "will" Mr. Howells say? For my part I think it distinctly crewel work to put a respectable spinster into such a hattitude before the world.
As subsequent critics have pointed out, the rest of the novel became an effort by the later writers to cope somehow with this introduction of Aunt Elizabeth as a sexual competitor with Peggy for her fiancee's affections. Although some of the writers had their doubts about Freeman's work, at least her reimagination of the spinster aunt gave the book a
Eventually, after many twists and turns introduced by the subsequent contributors, Harry Goward is dismissed as a suitor, Aunt Elizabeth is sent off to
New York City, and a more suitable mate for Peggy is found in a college professor named Stillman Dane. Peggy marries Dane and the couple sails off to Europewith Peggy's brother Charles and his wife Lorraine for a honeymoon tour.
Due to the novel's unusual collaborative nature, it was perhaps inevitable that critics, both contemporary and later, concentrated more on the interactions of the various writers than the actual substance of the book. As several commentators have pointed out, each writer seemed to want to bend the novel to his or her own particular vision of the plot and characters.
Freeman's reinvention of the maiden aunt as an independent, sexually alluring woman has come in for much comment, favorable and not.
Feministcritics have applauded Freeman's imagining of Aunt Elizabeth as a lively woman of spirit and intelligence. Others, such as contributor Alice Brown, thought Aunt Elizabeth was a gauche projection of Freeman's own personal issues. Brown believed that in creating Aunt Elizabeth, Freeman was reacting subconsciously to growing older. (In 1902 at age 49 Freeman had married a man seven years younger than herself, and the marriage proved unhappy.) Whatever the truth of this conjecture, Brown's penultimate chapter tied up the loose ends of the plot and helped resolve many of the difficulties of the collaboration.
The book's treatment of the issues of
family, marriageand women's roles in society has generated some comment, often colored by the personal ideologyof the commentator. Critics of all persuasions have admired editor Elizabeth Jordan's firm control over what sometimes threatened to be a hopelessly contentious project. Contributor Edith Wyatt, for instance, originally produced an unpublishable chapter, a series of letters that were out of harmony with the rest of the book. Jordan finally coaxed a rewritten and acceptable chapter from her. Then there were the inevitable disputes over payments. Many authors were insistent on generous compensation; Elizabeth Stuart Phelps demanded no less than $750, for example, easily equivalent to $15,000 in today's pre-tax money. And simply assembling the cast of authors was no easy task, as many writers—particularly Mark Twain—declined to participate in what some regarded as a literary stunt.
Many years after the book was published, Elizabeth Jordan exclaimed in her
autobiography: "The Whole Family" was a mess!" Critic Alfred Bendixen sympathized when he wrote: "As "The Whole Family" developed, the plot increasingly focused on family misunderstandings and family rivalries, which were mirrored by the artisticrivalries of the authors. The writing of the novel became a contest as much as it was a collaboration, with each author trying hard to impose his vision on the entire work."
In his long, dense but insightful chapter, and with charged
rhetoricreminiscent of his late novels, Henry James has the aestheticson Charles Talbert rail against the frustrations that he and his equally artistic wife Lorraine experience due to the claustrophobicrealities of family life in his small New England town:
:It's in fact in this beautiful desperation that we spend our days, that we face the pretty grim prospect of new ones, that we go and come and talk and pretend, that we consort, so far as in our deep-dyed hypocrisy we do consort, with the rest of the Family, that we have Sunday supper with the Parents and emerge, modestly yet virtuously shining, from the ordeal; that we put in our daily appearance at the Works—for a utility nowadays so vague that I'm fully aware (Lorraine isn't so much) of the deep amusement I excite there, though I also recognize how wonderfully, how quite charitably, they manage not to break out with it: bless, for the most part, their dear simple hearts!
James might as well have been talking about the frustrations that many of the authors felt with the "family" of their collaborators.
The novel's contemporary reception was rather favorable, with decent sales and mostly positive reviews. However, the book's sad
Amazon.comsales rankings show that this odd but interesting collaboration has been almost completely forgotten. Although a modern reader might find some of the material dated and uneven, the novel still manages to get its plot and characters into reasonable order. The collaboration may have been an uncomfortable one, but a final product did emerge with some clever and entertaining contributions from its often squabbling authors.
*Among the twelve of them, the authors have eight first names.
*The first born author was William Dean Howells (
1837), and the last to die was Mary Heaton Vorse, in 1966. The life-gap for the group is 129 years.
*"The Whole Family", foreword by June Howard, introduction by Alfred Bendixen, Duke University Press 2001 ISBN 0-8223-2838-0
*"Publishing the Family" by June Howard, Duke University Press 2001 ISBN 0-8223-2771-6
*gutenberg|no=5066|name=The Whole Family
* [http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:qzZ3HVHEbW0J:libres.uncg.edu/edocs/etd/1048/umi-uncg-1048.pdf+%22Competing+for+the+Reader%22+Hanrahan&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1 "Competing for the Reader"] , dissertation by Heidi Michelle Hanrahan with an extensive chapter on "The Whole Family"
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.