- British Emperor
Although in the past the style of British Emperor has been (retroactively) applied to a few mythical and historical rulers of Britain or Great Britain, it is sometimes used as a colloquialism to designate either
Plantagenet and Tudorcaesaropapism or, more frequently, the British sovereign during the period of theBritish Raj .Mythical British Kings
Mythical British ruler,
King Arthur , is referred to in medieval Welsh texts as "ameraudur" (meaning 'Emperor').Roman Caesars and Emperors ruling in Britain
:"See also:
Roman Britain "Before the Imperial form of rule came into existence in Rome,Julius Caesar conquered (a part of) Britain, in 55 BC, and again in 54 BC. Soon thereafter Romans were chased from the British isles.Roman imperial rule started with Emperor
Claudius ' conquest in 43 AD and ended around 410. By 425 at the latest all Roman influence had withered on the British isles. [http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/overview_roman_01.shtml Overview: Roman Britain, 43 - 410 AD] by [http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/overview_roman_07.shtml Neil Faulkner] ,BBC website,2006-09-06 .]Claudius
:"See also
Claudius#Expansion of the empire andBritannicus "Claudius became the first emperor ruling over Britain, as he re-conquered parts of Britain for the Romans in 43. As a result the Roman senate wanted to bestow him the cognomen "Britannicus". The emperor refused, and gave this cognomen to his two year old son byMessalina . This son, hence known by the nameBritannicus , did however not live to adulthood (he died in 55), and never became Emperor.Hadrian
:"See also
Hadrian#Britannia "EmperorHadrian is especially remembered on the British isles forHadrian's Wall , built in the 120s and 130s.Emperors using "Britannicus" as an honorific
Several Roman Emperors used "Britannicus (Maximus)" as an honorific:
*Severan Dynasty :Septimius Severus ,Caracalla .
*Dominate :Diocletian ,Maximian .Britannic Empire (late 3rd century)
:"See also:
List of Roman Emperors#Britannic Empire 286 to 297 and List of legendary kings of Britain"In the late 3rd century, by the end of the epoch of the "barracks emperor s" in Rome, there were two Britannic Emperors, reigning for about a decade:
*Carausius (reigned 286 to 293)
*Allectus (reigned 293 to 296 or 297)Constantine dynasty
Constantius Chlorus , Emperor of theWestern Roman Empire (reigned 305-306) was the father of Constantine I (reigned 306-337). Despite claims inGeoffrey of Monmouth 's late medieval pseudo-historical "Historia Regum Britanniae " there seems to be no evidence that Constantine's mother descended from native British rulers.Imperial ambitions 930 - 1066
Kings of England displayed imperial ambition in the period from 930 to 1066: [Stubbs, William. "Constitutional History of England". Oxford, 1903. Vol.1,Ch.7,Pg.195] [Le Goff, Jacques. "La civilisation de l'Occident médieval". Paris. 1964; English translation (1988): "Medieval Civilization", ISBN 0-631-17566-0 – these three medieval monarchs are discussed in Part II, Chapter VIII.]
*Athelstan (c.895 – 939) was a collector of imperial relics had himself proclaimed "imperator" in 930, six years after the death of the lastCarolingian emperor. His successors adopted increasingly grander imperial titles until theNorman conquest in 1066. Because there was no set title, the monarchs styled themselves as they please which peaked withEthelred the Unready . The most common imperial appendage wasbasileus butimperator ,princeps , augustus, and caesar were all used sporadically.*
Canute the Great (994/995 – 1035): according to his biographer Canute ruled as an emperor over the lands he acquired (Denmark ,England andNorway ).Norman Era: Empress Maud (Matilda)
In this case the epithet "Empress" was rather used to distinguish this person from other royals called Matilda or Maud. Matilda was not Empress of Britain - she took her title from her previous marriage to
Holy Roman Emperor Henry V.The "Imperium Maius" issue
Although several English monarchs flirted with the idea of "imperial" power, this never led to an official change of the title of "King/Queen" to that of "Emperor/Empress".
Imperium maius
In
Christian Europe the use of the title emperor was more than an affectation. A king recognises that the church is an equal or superior in the religious sphere, emperors do not. This was illustrated by Henry VIII ofEngland who started to use the wordimperium in his dispute with PopeClement VII over theannulment of his first marriage. The distinction began to blur when kings began to claim divine rights.English kings and the "imperium maius"
King
William I of England thought it important enough to request and get a Papal blessing for his conquest of England.Richard I of England refused to show deference toHenry VI, Holy Roman Emperor when held prisoner by him, declaring "I am born of a rank which recognizes no superior but God". [Elizabeth Longford, Elizabeth Harman Pakenham Longford (1989). "The Oxford Book of Royal Anecdotes", Oxford University Press, ISBN 0192141538. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Z4cYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22I+am+born+of+a+rank+which+recognizes+no+superior+but+God%22&dq=%22I+am+born+of+a+rank+which+recognizes+no+superior+but+God%22&pgis=1 p. 85] ] After Henry I agreed to theConcordat of London in 1107 the English kings recognised the supremacy of the Pope in matters spiritual. For example, whenThomas Becket was murdered, KingHenry II of England was forced to recognise that, although he ruled temporal matters, spiritual matters came under the authority of the Church in Rome.This changed with the dispute between
Henry VIII of England andPope Clement VII over Henry's wish to have his marriage toCatherine of Aragon annulled. TheAct in Restraint of Appeals (1533) explicitly stated that:Where by divers sundry old authentic histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this realm of England is an empire, and so hath been accepted in the world, governed by one supreme head and king, having the dignity and royal estate of theimperial crown of the same. [ [http://faculty.history.wisc.edu/sommerville/123/123week9.htm The opening words of the Act in restraint of Appeals, 1533] ] The next year the First Act of Supremacy (1534) explicitly tied the head of church to the imperial crown::The only supreme head in earth of theChurch of England called Anglicana Ecclesia, and shall have and enjoy annexed and united to the imperial crown of this realm. [ [http://faculty.history.wisc.edu/sommerville/123/123week9.htm Excerpt from The Act of Supremacy (1534)] ] The Crown of Ireland Act, passed by the Irish Parliament in 1541, (effective 1542) changed the traditional title used by the Monarchs of England for the reign over Ireland, fromLord of Ireland toKing of Ireland and naming Henry head of theChurch of Ireland , for similar reasons.During the reign of Mary Tudor the First Act of Supremacy was annulled, but during the reign of Elizabeth I the
Second Act of Supremacy , with simiar wording to the First Act, was passed in 1559. During theEnglish Interregnum the laws were annulled, but the acts which caused the laws to be in abeyance were themselves, deemed to be null and void by the Parliaments of theEnglish Restoration , so by act of ParliamentThe Crown of England and (later the British and UK crowns) are imperial crowns.George III rejects the idea of being called Emperor
In 1801 the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was created after the merging of the British and Irish parliaments. It was suggested that George III be declaredEmperor of this new union, and therefore become Emperor of the growingBritish Empire .Both the title of Emperor of the British and Irish and of Emperor of the British and Hanoverian Dominions were proposed as a replacement for the title of King.
George III rejected the idea of being called "Emperor", believing that tradition should be upheld.
British monarchs with the title Emperor/Empress of India (1877-1947)
When a royal marriage made it obvious to the British in 1877 that their Queen Victoria would be outranked by her own daughter who would someday become German Empress, the British government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, conferred the additional title "
Empress of India " by an Act of Parliament; it was also formally justified as the expression of Britain succeeding asparamount ruler of the subcontinent the former Mughal 'Padishah of Hind', using indirect rule through hundreds ofprincely state s formally under protection, not colonies, but accepting the British Sovereign as their 'feudal' suzerain. That title was relinquished by George VI with effect from 15 August 1947, whenIndia was granted independence.The
Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927 in which it was agreed that the United Kingdom and the dominions were "equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by common allegiance to the Crown, and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations". This in effect along with theStatute of Westminster, 1931 marked the beginning of the end of the British Empire and set the basis for the continuing relationship between theCommonwealth Realms and the structure of the Crown.ee also
*
Style of the British Sovereign References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.