Wissenschaft des Judentums

Wissenschaft des Judentums ("the science of Judaism" in German), refers to a nineteenth-century movement premised on the critical investigation of Jewish literature and culture, including rabbinic literature, using scientific methods to analyze the origins of Jewish traditions.

The "Verein für Cultur und Wissenschaft der Juden"

The first organized attempt at developing and disseminating "Wissenschaft des Judentums" was the "Verein für Cultur und Wissenschaft der Juden" ("Society for Jewish Culture and Knowledge"), founded around 1819 by Eduard Gans, (a pupil of Hegel), and his associates . Other members included Heinrich Heine, Leopold Zunz and Michael Beer, (youngest brother of Meyerbeer). It was an explicit attempt to provide a construct for the Jews as a "Volk" or people in their own right, independent of their religious traditions. As such it sought to validate their secular cultural traditions as being on an equal footing with those adduced by Herder and his followers for the German people. Immanuel Wolf’s influential essay "Über den Begriff einer Wissenschaft des Judentums" (On the Concept of a Jewish Science) of 1822, has such ideas in mind. The failure of the Verein, attributable largely to the far greater attraction, amongst German Jews, of identification with German culture, was followed, significantly, by the conversion to Christianity of many of its leading figures, including Gans and Heine.

The "Wissenschaft des Judentums" movement

).

Goals

Proponents of "Wissenschaft des Judentums" attempted to place Jewish culture on par with Western European culture, and endeavored to have "Jewish Studies" introduced into the university curriculum as a respectable area of study, freeing the field from the prevailing bias that regarded Judaism as an inferior precursor to Christianity and studied it as such. They also developed and advocated a style of scholarship which allowed complete freedom in the interpretation of traditional texts, and which might be pursued without concerns about the practical ramifications such interpretations might have for religious observance and religious life Harv|Glatzer|1964.

Leopold Zunz (1794–1886), one of the movement's leading figures, devoted much of his work to rabbinic literature. At the time, Christian thinkers maintained that the Jews' contribution ended with the Bible, and Zunz began to publish in the area of post-biblical rabbinic literature. His essays "Etwas uber die rabbinische literature" and "Zur Geschichte und Literatur" addressed this issue. His biography of Rashi of Troyes was pivotal. When the Prussian government forbade preaching sermons in German synagogues, on the grounds that the sermon was an exclusively Christian institution, Zunz wrote ”"History of the Jewish Sermon"” in 1832. This work has been described as "the most important Jewish book published in the 19th century." It lays down principles for the investigation of the Rabbinic exegesis (Midrash) and of the siddur (prayer-book of the synagogue).

Attitude toward religion

Despite the outstanding scholarship of "Wissenschaft" personalities such as Zunz and H. Graetz (most of whom pursued their scholarly labors on their own time as "privatgelehrter"), the "Wissenschaft" movement as a whole had a tendency to present Judaism as an historical relic Harv|Mendes-Flohr|1998 with frequently apologetic overtones Harv|Meyer|2004, and often ignored matters of contemporary relevance. As Harvtxt|Mendes-Flohr|1998 puts it:

Nevertheless, throughout most of its existence and despite certain of its most prominent practitioners, such as Steinschneider, being vocal opponents of religion, "Wissenschaft des Judentums" was very much a "religious" movement—pursued largely by rabbis at Jewish seminaries who were engaged in preparing their students for rabbinical careers Harv|Meyer|2004. Many of these "Wissenschaft" scholars, such as Z. Frankel and H. Graetz, while employing critical methods in their investigations, still considered the Jewish religion and Jewish history to be reflective of a divine revelation and guidance, while some, such as D. Hoffman, yet regarded even the Biblical "word" to be the product of divine revelation. It was this essentially religious nature of "Wissenschaft des Judentums" that made it even more dangerous in the eyes of its opponents Harv|Meyer|2004.

Attitude toward earlier scholarship

Indeed, one detects in the writings of many Wissenschaft scholars not only an intense love of scholarship "for its own sake", but also a genuine affinity for the rabbis and scholars of old, whose works they find themselves documenting, editing, publishing, analyzing, and critiquing. Indeed, far from disparaging or despising the Jewish religion and its many generations of rabbinical scholars, the majority of Wissenschaft practitioners are very keen to take "ownership" of the Jewish scholarly tradition. They see themselves as the rightful heirs and successors to Saadia and Rashi and Hillel and ibn Ezra, and in those prior generations of scholars they see their own Wissenschaft spirit and likeness.

In the Wissenschaft approach to scholarship, then, the earlier generations of scholars become "de-sanctified" and "re-humanized". Wissenschaft scholars feel completely free to pass judgment on the intellectual and scholarly capacities of earlier scholars, evaluating their originality, competence, and credibility, and pointing out their failures and limitations. The Wissenschaft scholars, while respectful of their predecessors, have no patience for a concept such as "yeridat ha-dorot". For them, the classical authorities are no more beyond dispute and critique than are contemporary scholars; the opinions of ibn Ezra and Steinschneider may be presented in the same sentence without any sense of impropriety, and either one may then be debunked with the same forwardness. No doubt this de-sanctification of the Jewish luminaries provided further grist for the opponents of the movement.

Legacy

Although the "Wissenschaft" movement produced a vast number of scholarly publications of lasting value, and its influence still reverberates through Jewish Studies departments (and, indeed, some yeshivas) around the word, it is possible to regard the publication of the "Jewish Encyclopedia" in 1901–1906 as the culmination and final flowering of this era in Jewish studies Harv|Levy|2002. The choice of English over German as the language for this epochal work is a further sign that an era of German scholarship was drawing to a close. In the early years of the new century the "Wissenschaft" culture and style of scholarship was transplanted to a certain extent to bodies such as the "Institute for Jewish Studies" at Hebrew University (e.g., Gershom Scholem) and Jewish Studies departments at American universities such as Brandeis and Harvard (e.g., Harry Austryn Wolfson).

Opposition

The "Wissenschaft" movement drew criticism from traditional elements in the Jewish community, who regarded it as sterile at best, and at worst damaging to the religious community. A key opposition leader was Samson Raphael Hirsch. He and other traditional religious scholars representing urban and sophisticated Orthodox constituencies regarded the "Wissenschaft" movement as draining traditional Jewish knowledge of its "sacral power" Harv|Mendes-Flohr|1998, and utterly failing to meet the needs of the living Jewish community. The Orthodox orientation of "Wissenschaft" figures such as David Zvi Hoffmann did not spare them from Hirsch's condemnation.

Guttmann and his "Philosophie des Judentums"

Julius Guttmann is best known for "Die Philosophie des Judentums" (Reinhardt, 1933), translations of which are available in Hebrew, Spanish, English, Japanese, etc. The English title is "Philosophies of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzweig" (New York, 1964). The unusual plural "Philosophies" in the book's title is not a translation glitch, but rather reflects the book's attitude toward the diversity of Jewish thought and Jewish thinkers; there is not a singular "Jewish philosophy."

Harvtxt|Roth|1962/1999 sees in this publication "the last product in the direct line of the authentic Judaeo-German 'Science of Judaism'" (more commonly known as Wissenschaft des Judentums). While the movement did not utterly expire with the publication Guttman's work—its spirit living on in the work of G. Scholem and H.A. Wolfson among many others—it is certainly the case that the Wissenschaft movement in Germany had by the 1930s already ceased to thrive.

The original German edition of Philosophie des Judentums ends with Hermann Cohen, the primary influence on Guttman's own philosophy, while the later Hebrew edition includes Franz Rosenzweig. It is also notable that Guttman's work excludes major thinkers of the Kabbalistic school, which reflects his own attitude toward Jewish philosophy (Werblowsky 1964).

List of "Wissenschaft des Judentums" personalities

*Leopold Zunz
*D. Hoffman
*H. Graetz
*M. Steinschneider
*S.J. Rapoport
*Gershon Scholem
*Solomon Schechter
*W. Bacher
*J. Guttmann

References

*Citation
first=Glatzer
last=Nahum M.
editor-last = Altmann
editor-first = Alexander
contribution = The beginnings of modern Jewish studies
contribution-url =
title=Studies in Nineteenth-Century Jewish Intellectual History
year=1964
pages=27–45
place =Cambridge, MA
publisher=Harvard University Press
url=
doi=
id=

*.

*.

*.

* Schorsch, Ismar From Text to Context: The Turn to History in Modern Judaism (1994) ISBN 0-87451-664-1

See also

* Jewish studies
* Hochschule für die Wissenschaft des Judentums

External links

* Goldestein Goren Intl. Center, e-lectures Wissenschaft des Judentums [http://hsf.bgu.ac.il/cjt/files/electures/glWissenschaft.htm]
* Iancu, Carol "From the "Science of Judaism" to the "New Israeli historians" - landmarks for a history of Jewish historiography" [http://www.unibuc.ro/eBooks/filologie/hebra/2-10.htm]