- Joseph Kosuth
Infobox Artist
bgcolour = #6495ED
name = Joseph Kosuth
imagesize =
caption =
birthname =
birthdate = 1945
location = Toledo,Ohio
deathdate =
deathplace =
nationality = American
field =Conceptual art
training =
movement =
works =
patrons =
influenced by =
influenced =
awards =Joseph Kosuth (born
January 31 ,1945 Toledo, Ohio ) is an influential Americanconceptual art ist.Life and work
Kosuth studied fine arts at the
School of Visual Arts inNew York City from 1965 to 1967.His art generally strives to explore the nature of
art , focusing on ideas at the fringe of art rather than on producing art "per se". Thus his art is veryself-referential , and a typical statement of his goes: :"The 'value' of particular artists afterDuchamp can be weighed according to how much they questioned the nature of art."Kosuth J., (1969), [http://www.ubu.com/papers/kosuth_philosophy.html "Art after Philosophy"] ]One of his most famous works is "
One and Three Chairs ", a visual expression ofPlato 's concept ofThe Forms . The piece features a physical chair, a photograph of that chair, and the text of a dictionary definition of the word "chair". The photograph is a representation of the actual chair situated on the floor, in the foreground of the work of art. The definition, posted on the same wall as the photograph, delineates in words the concept of what a chair is, in its various incarnations. In this and other, similar works, "Five Words in Blue Neon" and "Glass One and Three", Kosuth forwards tautological statements, where the works literally are what they say they are. [Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson, "Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology", MIT Press, 1999, pxl. ISBN 0262511177]In an addition to his artwork, he has written several books on the nature of art and artists, including "Artist as Anthropologist".In his essay "Art after Philosophy" (1969), he argued that art is the continuation of
philosophy , which he saw at an end. Like theSituationists , he rejected formalism as an exercise inaesthetics , with its function to be aesthetic. Formalism, he said, limits the possibilities for art with minimal creative effort put forth by the formalist. Further, since concept is overlooked by the formalist, "Formalist criticism is no more than an analysis of the physical attributes of particular objects which happen to exist in a morphological context". He further argues that the "change from 'appearance' to 'conception' (which begins with Duchamp's first unassisted readymade) was the beginning of 'modern art' and the beginning of 'conceptual art '." Kosuth explains that works of conceptual art are analytic propositions. They are linguistic in character because they express definitions of art. This makes themtautological . In this vein is another of his well-known pieces: InFigeac , Lot,France , on the "Place des écritures" (writings place) is a giant copy of theRosetta stone .In 2007 Kosuth participated with text about
Time at the symposium “Personal Structures Time-Space-Existence”, a project initiated by the artistRene Rietmeyer .Footnotes
References and notes
*Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson, "Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology",
MIT Press , 1999, pxl. ISBN 0262511177
*Joseph Kosuth, "Art After Philosophy and After", Collected Writings, 1966-1990. Ed. by G. Guercio, foreword byJean-Francois Lyotard ,MIT Press , 1991 (ISBN-10:0-262-11157-8 /ISBN-13:978-0-262-11157-7)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.