- Suburban colonization
The suburban colonization process is observed in larger cities that have suffered population and political power loss to
suburb s. Othercolonialism is often studied for the effects upon those already inhabiting the colonized area, but students of suburban colonization tend to take greater interest in the effects upon themetropole .Services and taxes favour suburbs
As hinterlands acquire more population and more power then, according to the
one man one vote principle, they get more votes in representative bodies, notably metropolitan regions or greater urban areas such as theGreater Toronto Area orGreater London . Suburban votes then come to outweighinner city votes, just as, a century earlier,urbanization or urban colonialization diminished the power of rural voters.Decisions of these bodies accordingly begin to favour people who live in suburbs, providing more car-oriented and
commuter services and more favourableproperty tax rates forsingle family home s astenant s in downtownapartment building s pay higher rates. In urban areas that are growing rapidly, services may be developed that favoururban sprawl , such as large trunksewer s, expresshighway s orshopping mall s, as other services such asyouth recreation disappear from downtown areas. This increases population drain to the suburbs asquality of life drops, but the increased population may then drive more people further out to the hinterlands which increases the political rewards (especiallypolitical donation s fromreal estate developer s building greenfield developments) for sprawl.Urban bankruptcy requires outside aid
In very extreme cases, where cities are unable to recover costs of serving a vast suburban hinterland and are politically controlled by a larger
jurisdiction , such asManhattan withinNew York state , cities may gobankrupt asNew York City in fact did in the 1970s. This had been predicted byurbanist s includingJane Jacobs who had foughtRobert Moses and his plan for theCross-Manhattan Expressway system which was eventually defeated. The City only recovered with federal aid andurban autonomy rights including the right to levy its ownincome tax which it still has.Suburban flight polarizes communities
Cities with impoverished downtown services can suffer
riot s or major unrest, asLos Angeles andDetroit did in the 1960s to 1980s. Such incidents speed the flight ofmiddle class residents to the suburbs and sometimes togated community developments where they are insulated from urban problems, and consume a very different range of services than downtown residents, which again are favoured strongly by political representatives.Forced mergers further reduce downtown power
In some cases, notably
Toronto andMontreal in the 1990s, a larger political unit will force smaller urban units to merge against the will of residents, and this further increases the hold of the outer suburban regions as they hold a majority of seats in the new aggregatedcity council . Where astrong mayor system applies, the larger number of suburban residents will likely also control that post, and the need to campaign over a larger urban area will tend to exclude grassroots candidates oranti-poverty activist candidates not funded nor supported by wealthier suburban voters or real estate developers. Those who speak for the city may live on its outer edges. Mayors may be former mayors of former suburban cities such asMel Lastman , former mayor ofNorth York who became Mayor of Toronto once those cities (and three others) were merged in 1998.The political consequences of both mergers were severe. In
Quebec , theParti Québécois government was defeated byJean Charest who permittedMontreal to hold areferendum in which it was permitted to de-amalgamate politically and regain the separate pre-merger urban identities. In Toronto no such relief occurred but aProvince of Toronto movement emerged under Jane Jacobs (who had moved to Toronto in the 1960s and again fought expressways penetrating the downtown there, notably theSpadina Expressway andFront Street Extension ), 2000 Lastman opponentTooker Gomberg and Mayor in 2003 (after Lastman) David Miller.Theoretical analyses
Joel Garreau in "Edge City" described the growth of cities on the edge of major urban areas, which became population and power centres in themselves.Dale Johnston in "Lost in the Suburbs " described a cultural and political gap that occurred inNew Jersey andOntario in the early 1990s when suburban voters began to outnumber urban or rural voters, and began to perceive that they were paying taxes to provide urban areas with services that were not duplicated in their community. Meanwhile, suburban communities would export problems to the cities, typically in the form ofdrug addict s,homelessness ,smog ,prostitution and other crimes serving suburban residents, and the need to accommodate a large number ofcommuter s and theirsewage andparking requirements. As downtown residents and suburban voters became estranged, each perceived themselves subsidizing the other, and accordingly a common solution, called in both New Jersey and Ontario the "Common Sense Revolution ", transferred funds from urban needs to suburban sprawl, triggering a decline in urban quality of life in both places, as population further spread out and downtowns became more hostile to suburban visitors.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.