Valente v. The Queen

Valente v. The Queen

- ! bgcolor="6699FF" | Case opinions
-
"Valente v. The Queen", [1985] 2 S.C.R. 673 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on protection of judicial independence under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Background

A Provincial Court of Ontario judge held he could not decide a sentence appeal for a conviction of careless driving under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act because he was not in a position to judge whether he was independent, and a person charged with an offense has a right to an independent tribunal under section 11(d) of the Charter. (Upon review, appellate courts chose to interpret the judge's decision as holding that he was "not" sitting as an independent judge under the meaning of section 11(d) of the Charter). Section 11(d) had come into effect in 1982, and until then only higher-level judges were independent under the Constitution. The concern was that the judiciary was vulnerable to the influence of the executive of the government. Among the listed specific concerns were that the executive set the salaries, the manner in which the executive can appoint and re-appoint judges, and the fact that judges are referred to as mere "civil servants" and receive the same sick leave and insurance plans, and the fact that the legislature does not need to approve a judge being removed from the bench. (Under the "Constitution Act, 1867", the removal of higher-level judges must be approved by the Parliament of Canada.)

The Ontario Court of Appeal held that the provincial court was an independent tribunal and so did have jurisdiction.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether a provincial court judge is sufficiently independent given their salaries and tenure.

Opinion of the Court

The Court held that provincial court judges did enjoy sufficient independence. The Court stated that a judge needs to be impartial and independent. Imparitality is "a state of mind" while independence is the quality of the relationship the judge has with the executive. The Court went on to say that even if a court acts as if it is independent, if its "objective status" does not match that of an independent court section 11(d) is triggered. Thus, section 11(d) can be considered through a test in which one asks whether it seems reasonable to believe a court is independent. This thus ensures the court has "respect and acceptance."

The Court gave three requirements for judicial independence within the meaning of section 11(d) of the Charter. There must be 1) security of tenure, 2) financial security, and 3) institutional independence in administrative matters relevant to the functioning of the judge.

On the facts, the Court found that all three requirements had been satisfied. The Court noted that difficult standards for judicial independence could not be set because section 11(d) applied to too many different types of tribunals. Thus, the degree of independence for higher-level judges under the "Constitution Act, 1867" could not be found under section 11(d). The Court found that while the security of tenure of the provincial courts was not perfect, the fact that there must be a reason for the removal of a judge and that there be a review carried out not by the executive was enough.

As for salaries, Ontario at the time took recommendations from a salary commission. This was enough to suggest serious thought goes into the setting of the salaries, though the Supreme Court added such committees may not be needed in every case. The fact that there was a law ensuring judges should have remuneration was also taken as important. Regarding comparisons of judges to civil servants, the Supreme Court said that this was not meant to suggest the government has as much control over judges as over civil servants, or to devalue the role of judges. It was enough that the salaries be secure.

Finally, the Court turned to administrative independence. The Supreme Court noted the provincial courts already independently decided which judges should hear what cases. Those who questioned the independence of the provincial courts suggested the courts should also gain more control over their budgets, salaries and how judges are promoted. The Supreme Court replied more independence may be "highly desirable," but it was not "essential for purposes of s. 11(d)."

Aftermath

Judicial independence would later be extended under the "Provincial Judges Reference" of 1997, which followed "Valente" in stating that judges should enjoy administrative independence; however, this meant overturning "obiter dicta" in "Valente" that judicial salary commissions were not needed to ensure a salary is free of political manipulation.

ee also

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
* Beauregard v. Canada
* R. v. Généreux
* MacKeigan v. Hickman
* Therrien (Re)
* Provincial Court Judges' Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice)

External links

* [http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1985/vol2/html/1985scr2_0673.html full text from LexUM]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • The opera corpus — is a list of nearly 2,500 works by more than 775 individual opera composers. Some of the works listed below are still being performed today   but many are not. The principal works of the major composers are given as well as those of historical… …   Wikipedia

  • The Mutants: Pathways of the Heart — Os Mutantes Caminhos do Coração Los Mutantes Caminos del Corazon Format Spin off / Sci fi / Telenovela Created by …   Wikipedia

  • The Grim Adventures of Billy \x26 Mandy — The Grim Adventures of Billy Mandy Saltar a navegación, búsqueda The Grim Adventures of Billy Mandy Título Las Macabras Aventuras de Billy y Mandy (España) Las Sombrías Aventuras de Billy y Mandy (Hispanoamérica) Género Animación Creado por… …   Wikipedia Español

  • The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy — Título Las Macabras Aventuras de Billy y Mandy (España) Las Sombrías Aventuras de Billy y Mandy (Hispanoamérica) Género Animación Comedia Humor negro<br MacabroEscatológico Creado por Maxwell Atoms Reparto Ver …   Wikipedia Español

  • Section Eleven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — is the section of the Canadian Constitution s Charter of Rights that protects a person s legal rights in criminal and penal matters. This includes both criminal as well as regulatory offences, as it provides rights for those accused by the state… …   Wikipedia

  • The Death of Koschei the Deathless — The Death of the Immortal Koschei or Marya Morevna is a Russian fairy tale collected by Alexander Afanasyev in Narodnye russkie skazki and included by Andrew Lang in The Red Fairy Book.[1] The character Koschei is an evil, immortal man who… …   Wikipedia

  • Catherynne M. Valente — (born May 5, 1979, Seattle, Washington) is an American poet, novelist, and literary critic. Her writing tends to be postmodern, with rich language (drawing upon her Classics education) and surrealist elements. She has also ventured into a more… …   Wikipedia

  • Billy \x26 Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen — Billy Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen Saltar a navegación, búsqueda Billy Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen Título Billy y Mandy: La Ira de la Reina Araña Ficha técnica Dirección Matt Engstrom Gordon Kent Kris Sherwood Juli Hashiguchi Dirección… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Aftermath of the Falklands War — Remains of a helicopter shot down in South Georgia Island during Falklands War. (Photo taken 1999) Contents 1 Political aftermath …   Wikipedia

  • Provincial Judges Reference — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions |The Provincial Judges Reference [the three formal titles of the decision are Manitoba Provincial Judges Assn. v. Manitoba (Minister of Justice) from the Manitoba appeal, R. v. Campbell; R. v. Ekmecic; R. v.… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”