Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice)

SCCInfoBox
case-name=Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice)
full-case-name=Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium,
B.C. Civil Liberties Association,James Eaton Deva and Guy Allen Bruce Smythe v. The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, the Minister of National Revenue and the Attorney General of British Columbia
heard-date=March 16, 2000
decided-date=December 15, 2000
citations= [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120, 2000 SCC 69 (CanLII)
Parallel citations: (2000), 193 D.L.R. (4th) 193; (2000), [2001] 2 W.W.R. 1; (2000), 150 C.C.C. (3d) 1; (2000), 28 Admin. L.R. (3d) 1; (2000), 28 Admin. L.R. (3e) 1; (2000), 38 C.R. (5th) 209; (2000), 79 C.R.R. (2d) 189; (2000), 83 B.C.L.R. (3d) 1
docket=
history=Judgment for the Minister of Justice at the British Columbia Court of Appeal
ruling=
ratio=
SCC=2000-2001
Majority=Binnie J. (paras. 1-161)
JoinMajority=McLachlin C.J. and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Major, and Bastarache JJ.
Concurrence/Dissent=Iacobucci J. (paras. 162-283)
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=Arbour and LeBel J.
Dissent=
JoinDissent=
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=

"Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice)" [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120, 2000 SCC 69 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on freedom of expression and equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was held that the Customs Act, which gave broad powers to customs inspectors to exclude "obscene" materials, violated the right to freedom of expression under section 2 but was justifiable under section 1.

Little Sister's Book and Art Emporium is a bookstore in Vancouver, BC that sells gay and lesbian-related literature. It imports most of its material from the United States, which has often caused trouble at the border when the material would be refused entry as it was classified as obscene. The bookstore challenged the section of the Customs Act which prohibited the importation obscene material as well as a section of the Act that put the onus on the importer to disprove obscenity.

At trial, the court found that the customs has targeted shipments to the bookstore and attempted to prevent them from getting in. Consequently, the government was found to have violated section 2 of the Charter. However, the violation was justified under section 1.

In a 6 to 3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the trial judge and found that though there was violation of section 2, it was justified under section 1.

ee also

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)

External links

*
* [http://www.mapleleafweb.com/scc/public3/decisions/2000_2scr_1120_02.html summary of case at mapleleafweb.com]