- Howell torpedo
The Howell Automobile Torpedo was the first self-propelled (locomotive)
torpedo inUnited States Navy service.It was conceived by LCdr. (later Rear Admiral) John A. Howell (1840–1918), USN, in 1870, using a 60 kg (130 lb)
flywheel spun at very high speed (10000 to 12000 rpm) to store energy and drivepropellor s. Because it had no complicatedengine and fuel system, the Howell was much cheaper and easier to build than its main competitor, the Whitehead. In addition, unlike the Whitehead, the Howell was wakeless, not giving away the position of the firing vessel; its flywheel was, however, very noisy. It did demand largewinch es to "spin up" the flywheel (a drawback not solved in the Howell's operational lifetime.) Also unlike the Whitehead, itstrim did not vary up and down. (In this, it resembled the extremely unrealistic torpedoes depicted byHollywood .Fact|date=January 2008) These things were all due to the gyroscopic effect of the flywheel; any tumbling was corrected by simplependulum (an idea pioneered, it should be said, by Whitehead). It made the Howell the first torpedo to use this effect; when, in an attempt to improve stability, Whitehead (using aLudwig Obry design) adopted them in 1895, Howell sued forpatent infringement .After very protracted development -- the product of a paucity of funds, the novelty of the torpedo as a weapon, and, one must say,
myopia of the Navy's senior officers -- fifty Howell Torpedoes Mark 1 were ordered (fromHotchkiss Ordnance Co. of Providence,Rhode Island ) in 1889. This was 14.2 in (36 cm) diameter, 129.75 in (330 cm) long, with a 96 lb (43.5 kg) warhead and a range of 400 yd (365 m) at 25 knots (46 km/h). Contemporary Whiteheads, built byE.W. Bliss & Co , had superior performance, and greater growth capacity.These fifty would be the only production examples, as the Howell was superseded by a rapidly-improving Whitehead in 1892; as a consequence, the Howell's drawbacks were never cured. It is, therefore, impossible to know if quieting would have mitigated any loss of surprise to noise (as sometimes suggested). It is probable, however, USN submariners in WW2 would have been grateful for anything that would have made torpedoes simpler, cheaper, and more susceptible to interwar trials; the Whithead-based design they went to war with was an unquestioned disaster.
ources
*Blair, Clay. "Silent Victory". Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1975
*Fitzsimons, Bernard, general editor. "Howell", in "The Encyclopedia of Twentieth Century Weapons and Warfare". London: Phoebus/BBC, 1978. Volume 13, page 1371.
*"Howell torpedo", in "The Columbia Encyclopedia", Sixth Edition, online
*Kirby, Geoff. "A History of the Torpedo The Early Days", in "The Journal of the Royal Navy Scientific Service", Vol 27 No 1.
*Milford, Frederick J. "US Navy Torpedoes--Part One: Torpedoes through the thirties", in "The Submarine Review", April 1996. (a quarterly publication of the Naval Submarine League, P.O. Box 1146, Annandale, VA 22003)External links
*http://www.hansonclan.co.uk
*http://www.globalsecurity.org
*http://www.btinternet.com/~philipr/torps
*http://www.geocities.com/gwmccue
*http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp1
*http://navytorpedo.com
* [https://keyportmuseum.cnrnw.navy.mil/html/howell_torpedo.html Howell Torpedo Display at the US Naval Undersea Museum]ee also
*
Torpedo
*List of torpedoes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
