Goldwater Institute

The Goldwater Institute is a Phoenix, Arizona-based public policy think-tank established in 1988. The president is Darcy A. Olsen. The Goldwater Institute advances public policies with emphasis on lower taxes, limited government spending, school choice, and a reduction in government management of the economy. It describes itself as "an independent, nonpartisan research and educational organization dedicated to the study of public policy in Arizona," and it is devoted to the principles championed by the late Senator Barry Goldwater such as "individual rights, economic freedom, and a government of strictly limited powers." Today the Goldwater Institute has a staff of 12 and a 2005 budget slightly over $1.4 million. In addition, the Goldwater Institute has a number of affiliated senior fellows who are not in residence, including Carrie Lukas, Dan Lips, Randy Barnett, Dr. James Gwartney, Alan Kors, and Gordon Tullock.

Financial support

The Institute's funding comes from private foundations and from hundreds of individual Arizonans. The Institute does not accept government funds. Its 2005 revenues were just under $1.5 million.

Issues

On education reform, the Goldwater Institute has published articles critical of the AIMS standardized test, critical of the No Child Left Behind Act, in favor of school vouchers for higher education, and opposed to bilingual education.

On economic policy, the Goldwater Institute has published articles favoring supply-side economics, popularized by Arthur Laffer, tax cuts, and spending reductions.

On constitutional policy, the Goldwater Institute has been critical of Arizona's Clean Elections system and campaign finance reform in general and has criticized government abuse of eminent domain power.

The Goldwater Institute opposes government bans on the use of tobacco in public establishments.

Litigation Center

The Goldwater Institute created the Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation, directed by Clint Bolick, in June 2007. The Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation will engage in lawsuits against the government to ensure adherence to constitutional law and to protect individual rights, such as property rights, from potential government intrusion. The Goldwater Institute currently funds its litigation center entirely from donations and sues on behalf of Arizonans free of charge.

The Goldwater filed its first case on June 22, 2007 defending five charter schools from Arizona's department of education. [http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation/cases.aspx] ]

Currently the Goldwater Institute has four lawsuits against government bodies in Arizona. The first, Charter School v. Horne is a suit against the Arizona Department of Education's social studies mandate.. In the second lawsuit, Turken v. Gordon the Goldwater Institute is suing the city of Phoenix over a $100 million corporate subsidy to the CityNorth development which the Goldwater Institute claims is illegal under the Arizona constitution. [ [http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation/turkenvgordon.aspx Goldwater Institute legal case: Turken v. Gordon ] ]

The Goldwater Institutes's third lawsuit seeks to terminate the "Cultural Impact Fee" in Mesa, Arizona. The cultural impact fee is tax charged to new homes to fund local museums. The fourth case, Preston v. Hallman, sues the city of Tempe on behalf of a tattoo parlor owner whose permit to operate in Tempe was revoked based on stereotypes of people with tattoos. [ [http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation/prestonvhallman.aspx Preston v. Hallman ] ]

On June 27, 2008, the Goldwater Instutute filed a special action petition with the Arizona Supreme Court, challenging the Arizona Corporation Commission's ability to promulgate environmental regulations. [Miller v. Arizona Corporation Commission, [http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation/millervacc.aspx] .] The ACC's new rules require utility companies to derive a specified share of their power from alternative sources. Included in the regulation is a provision allowing those companies to pass on the cost of compliance through rate surcharges that will total millions of dollars. This action invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, requesting a writ of mandamus to compel the ACC and Attorney General to take action to reverse the regulations.

References

See also

*Barry Goldwater
*Conservatism
*Libertarianism

External links

* [http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/ The Goldwater Institute]
* [http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/0727thur1-27.html Playing Politics with brutal crime, Arizona Republic, July 27, 2006]

Goldwater Institute in the Media

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPx3IRjQt2o
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=annS8qTBrhM
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA7S6PWBieM
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrxjuPMX3OI