- Timothy Williamson
Timothy Williamson (born
Uppsala ,Sweden ,6 August 1955 ) is a distinguished Britishphilosopher whose main research interests are inphilosophical logic ,philosophy of language ,epistemology andmetaphysics .He is currently the
Wykeham Professor of Logic at theUniversity of Oxford , and Fellow ofNew College, Oxford . He was previously Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at theUniversity of Edinburgh (1995-2000); Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy atUniversity College, Oxford (1988-1994); and Lecturer in Philosophy atTrinity College, Dublin (1980-1988). He was president of theAristotelian Society from 2004 to 2005.He is a
Fellow of the British Academy (FBA),Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (FRSA) and is member of the [http://www.wkdialogue.ch World Knowledge Dialogue] Scientific Board.Education
Timothy Williamson's university education was entirely at
Oxford University . He graduated in 1976 with a B.A. (first class honours) in Mathematics and Philosophy, and in 1981 with a doctorate in philosophy (D.Phil.) for a thesis examining "The Concept of Approximation to the Truth".Contribution to philosophy
Williamson has contributed to analytic
philosophy of language ,logic ,metaphysics andepistemology .On
vagueness , he holds a position known asepistemicism , which states that every seemingly vague predicate (like "bald ", or "thin ") actually has a sharp cutoff, which is impossible for us to know. That is, there is some number of hairs such that anyone with that number is bald, and anyone with even one more hair is not. In actuality, this condition will be spelled out only partly in terms of numbers of hairs, but whatever measures are relevant will have some precise cutoff. This solution to the difficultsorites paradox was considered an astonishing and unacceptable consequence, but has become a relatively mainstream view since his defense of it [sep entry|vagueness|Vagueness] . Williamson is fond of using the statement, "no one knows whether I am thin" to illustrate his view. [ [http://philosophy.hku.hk/courses/old/laurencegoldstein/phil2511/lecture7.html Phil 2511: Paradoxes ] ]In
epistemology , he suggests that the concept ofknowledge is unanalyzable. This goes against the common trend in philosophical literature up to that point, which was to argue that knowledge could be analysed into constituent concepts. (Typically this would bejustified true belief plus an extra factor). He agrees that knowledge entails justification, truth andbelief , but that it is conceptually primitive. He accounts for the importance of belief by discussing its connections with knowledge, but avoids the disjunctivist position of saying that belief can be analyzed as the disjunction of knowledge with some distinct, non-fact ive mental state.Publications
* "Identity and Discrimination", Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
* "Vagueness", London: Routledge, 1994.
* "Knowledge and Its Limits ", Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
* "The Philosophy of Philosophy", Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Williamson has also published more than 120 articles in peer-reviewed scholarly journals.
External links
* [http://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/faculty/members/index_tw.htm Timothy Williamson's homepage] at
University of Oxford 's Department of Philosophy.References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.