- Polygonal fort
A polygonal fort is a
fortification in the style that evolved around the middle of thenineteenth century , in response to the development of powerful explosive shells.The complex and sophisticated designs of star forts that preceded them were highly effective against cannon assault, but proved much less effective against the more accurate fire of
rifled guns and the destructive power of explosive shells. The polygonal style of fortification is also described as a "flankless fort". Many were built during the government ofLord Palmerston , and so they are also often referred to as Palmerston forts. Their low profile makes them easy to overlook. In response to the vulnerabilities of star forts,military engineers evolved a much simpler but more robust style of fortification.The ditch became deep and vertical sided, cut directly into the native rock. It was laid out as a series of straight lines surrounding the fortified area that gives this style of fortification its name.The ditch was swept by fire from defensive
blockhouse s (caponier s) set in the ditch, and firing positions cut into the outer face of the ditch itself (counterscarp battery).The profile of the fort becomes very low indeed, surrounded outside the ditch by a gently sloping open area (
glacis ), so as to provide no protection for an enemy while the fort itself provides a minimal target for enemy fire, and the narrow ditch a difficult target for plunging shellfire.The
counterscarp , (the outside of the ditch) is usually vertical, while the upper edge of the scarp is steeply sloping and often revetted in stone, to help shed shells into the ditch.Access to the fort was down a curving ramp cut into the glacis, then through a
gatehouse set deep in the scarp of the ditch, reached by a rolling bridge that withdrew into the gatehouse.The majority of the fort is underground, with deep passages giving access to the counterscarp batteries and the ditches defensive blockhouses (caponniers) from within the fort.
Magazines and
machinery halls are deep under the surface, with only theemplacement s for the fort'sgun s exposed at the surface.Perhaps surprisingly the guns were often mounted in open emplacements, known as "en
barbette ", simply protected by aparapet . This was not only to lower the outline of the fortress, but also because guns of this period were rifled muzzle loaders (RML), still usingblack powder as theirpropellant , which generated large amounts of fumes and smoke.Because of the fast burning propellant,
gun barrel s were short, and accuracy still relatively low. Experience had shown that guns could be put out of action by collapsing theircasemates around them by bombardment. The gun in its open emplacement was a much harder target to hit than the massive face of a casemate.The polygonal forts provided robust and defendable gun platforms. They were built in the context of a larger defensive scheme, as forward batteries to engage the enemy and prevent them bombarding more vulnerable targets, like
city rail centres anddockyards .Forts of this style were built extensively from the middle of the
nineteenth century , but the end of the century saw the development of slower burning propellants, which allowed longer guns with much better range and accuracy and that produced much less smoke, and this along with the increasing reliability ofbreech-loading guns, favoured fortifications completely underground except for massive steelcupolas containing the guns.The increasing range of
field artillery also required corresponding increases in the depth of zone that forts needed to be defend to prevent bombardment of the resources being defended.Meanwhile the development of
machine guns andbarbed wire offered a more flexible and much cheaper means of protecting frominfantry assault compared to the polygonal fort's ditches and blockhouses.Many of the polygonal forts continued in service, even through the Second World War, since they provided convenient strongpoints, and their open emplacements readily accepted anti-aircraft batteries and quick firing guns, but the art of fortification had moved on.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.