Living tree doctrine

Living tree doctrine

:"Living tree" redirects here. For the biological sense of the living tree, see Tree"In Canadian law, the living tree doctrine is a doctrine of constitutional interpretation that says that a constitution is organic and must be read in a broad and progressive manner so as to adapt it to the changing times.

The living tree doctrine has been deeply entrenched into Canadian constitutional law since the seminal constitutional case of "Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General)" also widely known as the "Persons Case" wherein Lord Sankey stated: "The British North America Act planted in Canada a living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits." This is known as the Doctrine of Progressive Interpretation. This means that the Constitution cannot be interpreted in the same way as an ordinary statute. Rather, it must be read within the context of society to ensure that it adapts and reflects changes. If constitutional interpretation adheres to the Framer's Intent and remains rooted in the past, the Constitution would not be reflective of society and eventually fall into disuse.

"The "frozen concepts" reasoning runs contrary to one of the most fundamental principles of Canadian constitutional interpretation: that our Constitution is a living tree which, by way of progressive interpretation, accommodates and addresses the realities of modern life." [Supreme Court of Canada, in its ruling, , December 2004]

The interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms also makes use of the living tree doctrine. As Justice Lamer noted in "Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act" (1985), "If the newly planted 'living tree' which is the Charter is to have the possibility of growth and adjustment over time, care must be taken to ensure that historical materials, such as the Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee, do not stunt its growth." [Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act, para. 53.]

References

ee also

*Living Constitution
*Persons Case
*Constitutional history of Canada
*Original Intent


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Living Constitution — The Living Constitution is a concept in constitutional interpretation which suggests that the Constitution should be seen as continually evolving with the society that implements it. The idea is associated with views that modern values should be… …   Wikipedia

  • Tree of life — For other uses, see Tree of life (disambiguation). An 1847 depiction of the Norse Yggdrasil as described in the Icelandic Prose Edda by Oluf Olufsen Bagge The concept of a tree of life, a many branched tree illustrating the idea that all life on… …   Wikipedia

  • Development of Jehovah's Witnesses doctrine — Part of a series on Jehovah s Witnesses Overview …   Wikipedia

  • Christian Doctrine —     Christian Doctrine     † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Christian Doctrine     Taken in the sense of the act of teaching and the knowledge imparted by teaching , this term is synonymous with CATECHESIS and CATECHISM. Didaskalia, didache, in the… …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • High living — High High, a. [Compar. {Higher}; superl. {Highest}.] [OE. high, hegh, hey, heh, AS. he[ a]h, h?h; akin to OS. h?h, OFries. hag, hach, D. hoog, OHG. h?h, G. hoch, Icel. h?r, Sw. h[ o]g, Dan. h[ o]i, Goth. hauhs, and to Icel. haugr mound, G. h[… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General) — infobox court case name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General) court=Judicial Committee of the Privy Council date decided= October 18, 1929 full name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General) citations= [Case citation#England and Wales| [1930] A.C. 124] …   Wikipedia

  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Canada This article is part of the series: Politics and government of Canada   …   Wikipedia

  • Re Same-Sex Marriage — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions | Reference re Same Sex Marriage [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698, 2004 SCC 79, was a reference question to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the constitutional validity of same sex marriage in Canada. The ruling was… …   Wikipedia

  • Stare decisis — (Anglo Latin pronunciation: /ˈstɛəri dɨˈsaɪsɨs]) is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions. The words originate from the phrasing of the principle in the Latin maxim Stare decisis et …   Wikipedia

  • Original intent — Intentionalism redirects here. For the historiographical theory, see functionalism versus intentionalism. For theories of authorial intent, see authorial intentionality and intentional fallacy …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”