- Arkaim
Arkaim is an archaeological site situated in the Southern
Urals steppe, 8.2 km north-to-northwest of Amurskiy, and 2.3 km south-to-southeast of Alexandronvskiy, two villages in theChelyabinsk Oblast ,Russia , just to the north from theKazakhstan i border.The site is generally dated on the
17th century BC . Earlier dates, up to the 20th century BC, have been proposed. It was a settlement of theSintashta-Petrovka culture.Discovery and excavation
The site was discovered in
1987 by a team ofChelyabinsk scientists who were preparing the area to be flooded in order to create a reservoir, and examined in rescue excavations led by . At first their findings were ignored by Soviet authorities, who planned to flood the site as they had floodedSarkel earlier, but the attention attracted by news of the discovery forced the Soviet government to revoke its plans for flooding the area. It was designated a cultural reservation in 1991, and inMay 2005 the site was visited by PresidentVladimir Putin .The settlement
Although the settlement was burned and abandoned, much detail is preserved. Arkaim is similar in form but much better preserved than neighbouring
Sintashta , where the earliestchariot was unearthed. The site was protected by two circular walls. There was a central square, surrounded by two circles of dwellings separated by a street. The settlement covered ca. 20,000 m². The diameter of the enclosing wall was 160 m. It was built from earth packed into timber frames, and reinforced with unburned clay brick, with a thickness of 4-5 m. and a height of 5.5 m. The settlement was surrounded with a 2 m-deep moat.There are 4 entrances into the settlement through the outer and inner wall with the main entrance to the west. The dwellings were between 110-180 m² in area. The outer ring of dwellings number 39 or 40, with entrances to a circular street in the middle of the settlement. The inner ring of dwellings number 27, arranged along the inner wall, with doors to the central square of 25 m by 27 m. The central street was drained by a covered channel. Zdanovich estimates that approximately 1500 to 2500 people could have lived in the settlement.
Surrounding Arkaim's walls, were arable fields, 130-140 m by 45 m, irrigated by a system of canals and ditches. Remains of
millet andbarley seeds were found.The 17th century date suggests that the settlement was about co-eval to, or just post-dating, the
Indo-Aryan migration into South Asia andMesopotamia (theGandhara grave culture appearing in theNorthern Pakistan from ca.1600 BC , the Indo-EuropeanMitanni rulers reachedAnatolia before1500 BC , both roughly 3,000 km removed from the Sintashta-Petrovka area), and that it was either an early Iranian culture, or an unknown branch of Indo-Iranian that did not survive into historical times.In pseudoarchaeology and national mysticism
Since its discovery, Arkaim has attracted public and media attention in Russia, from a broad range of the population, including
esoteric ,New Age andpseudoscientific organizations. It is said to be the most enigmatic archaeological site within the territory ofRussia , and as with many archaeological discoveries, many conflicting interpretations have been put forward.wastika City
In order to gain publicity, the early investigators described Arkaim as "Swastika City", "Mandala City", and "the ancient capital of early
Aryan civilization, as described in theAvesta andVeda s". The swastika description refers to the floor plan of the site, which (with some imagination) may appear similar to the swastika symbol, albeit with rounded arms (similar to the "lauburu ") attached to a central ring instead of a cross.Observatory
The similarity of latitude, date, and size led some archaeoastronomists (Bystrushkin 2003) to compare Arkaim with
Stonehenge in England. According to their claims, the Neolithicobservatory at Stonehenge allowed for observation of 15 astronomical phenomena using 22 elements, whereas the contemporaneous observatory at Arkaim allowed for observation of 18 astronomical phenomena using 30 elements. The precision of measurements in Stonehenge is estimated at 10 arc-minutes to a degree, that in Arkaim being put at 1 arc-minute. Such a precision of astronomical observations was not repeated until the compilation ofAlmagest about 2 millennia later. The interpretation as an observatory for either Stonehenge or Arkaim is not universally accepted.References
*Jones-Bley, K.; Zdanovich, D. G. (eds.), "Complex Societies of Central Eurasia from the 3rd to the 1st Millennium BC", 2 vols, JIES Monograph Series Nos. 45, 46, Washington D.C. (2002), ISBN 0-941694-83-6, ISBN 0-941694-86-0.
*Panel-Philippe, G.; Stone-Peter, G., "The Constructed Past:Experimental Archeology, Education and the Public", Routledge (July 1999)ISBN 0-415117-68-2.External links
* [http://www.usu.ru/frames/?code=eng&whatsdoc=events/1999/Arkaim/ Ural State University invitation for conference]
* [http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001123/112397e.pdf Archaeology and ethnic politics: the discovery of Arkaim]
* [http://www.csen.org/koryakova2/Korya.Sin.Ark.html General information]
* [http://www.krasn.ru/geoph/kochnev_228_CD.htm Magnetic phenomena in Arkaim]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.