- Religious persecution
Religious persecution is the systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs of affiliations. The tendency of societies to alienate or repress different subcultures is a recurrent theme in human history. Moreover, because a person's religion often determines to a significant extent his or her morality and personal identity, religious differences can be significant cultural factors. Religious persecution may be triggered by religious bigotry (i.e. the denigration of practitioners religions other than those of the oppressors) or by the State when it views a particular religious group as a threat to its interests or security. Particularly (but not exclusively) in cases where the person's religion fails to emphasize a love and tolerance for all humanity, he or she may fall into the trap of considering practitioners of another religion as amoral or inferior.Fact|date=March 2008 At a societal level, this dehumanization of a particular religious group may readily turn into violence or other forms of persecution. Even those who consider
religiosityin general to be declining (i.e. those believe secularizationis progressing) would agree that religious persecution continues to be a serious issue worldwide. Global media coverage of increasing numbers of participants in religious fundamentalismand religiously related terrorism obviate the prevalence of such persecutions worldwide. Indeed, in many countries of the world today, religious persecution has resulted in so much violence that it is considered a human rightsproblem.
Forms of religious persecution
A situation in which religious persecution occurs is the opposite of
freedom of religion. However, freedom of religion is not necessarily identical with the separation of church and stateand religious pluralism. In a country that is not a secular state, freedom of religion can exist if the state religiongrants religious tolerationto all other religions and denominations.
Often it is the alleged
persecutionof individuals within a group in the attempt to maintain their religion identity, or the exercise of power by an individual or organization that causes members of a religious group to suffer. Persecution in this case may refer to confiscation or destruction of property, incitement to hate, arrest, imprisonment, beatings, torture, and execution.
Denial of benefits and denial of certain civil rights and liberties are less severe, and are either described as mild forms of religious persecution or as
religious discrimination. There clearly is a difference between denying a religious group tax-exempt status and threatening them with imprisonment.
Religious persecution and ethnicity
Other acts of violence, such as
war, torture, and ethnic cleansingmight not necessarily be aimed at religion. Populations that belong to different ethnic groups often also belong to different religions or denominations. Although the difference between religious and ethnical identity might sometimes be obscure (see: Ethnoreligious), the infamous cases of Genocideof the 20th century could not be explained by religious differences. [Still, cases such as the Pontic tragedy, the Armenian Genocide, the Assyrian Genocideor the current Darfur conflict(see: Janjaweed) Fact|date=October 2007 are sometimes seen as religious persecution.]
The most infamous case of
antisemitismin the 20th century, the systematic mass murderof millions of European Jewsby the Nazis, was not religious persecution, since the Nazis persecuted the Jews as a race, not as a religion. The Shoah made no distinction between secular Jews, atheistic Jews, orthodox Jews and Jews that had converted to Christianity. Only the persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nazi Germanycan be seen as religious persecution; About 12,000 of them were arrested. However, they were given the opportunity to renounce their faith and pledge to support the war in order to avoid being incarcerated. [.cite book|title=Persecution and Resistance of Jehovah's Witnesses During the Nazi Regime|author=Hans Hesse|url=http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN3861087502&id=mcxD0qxHMO0C&printsec=frontcover|year=2001|pages=9,10] (For more information see the article Religion in Nazi Germany).
Reasons for religious persecution
The descriptive use of the term religious persecution is rather difficult. Religious persecution has taken place a least since the
Persecution of early Christians in the Roman Empire, and has happened in completely different historical, geographical and social contexts, but nevertheless, some generalizations are necessary. In the Western worldour now common rejection of religious persecution originated in 17th century England. The English 'Call for Toleration' was the turning point in the Christian debate on religious persecution. This time has been debated thoroughly by historians, whereas, for the obvious reason of the over-abundance of material, historians generally avoid writing books on the whole of human history.
The most ambitious chronicle of that time is W.K.Jordans
magnum opus"The Development of Religious Toleration in England, 1558-1660" (four volumes, published 1932-1940). Jordan wrote as the thread of fascismrose in Europe, and this work is seen as a defence of the fragile valuesof humanismand tolerance. [Coffey 2000, 2]
The demand for religious uniformity
Separation of Church and Stateis a modern phenomenon. In modern western civil law any citizen may join and leave a religious organisation at will, but this understanding of religious tolerationas civil toleration only emerged a few centuries ago. By contrast, in early modern Europethe subjects were required to attend the state church; This attitude can be described as "territoriality" or "religious uniformity", and its underlying assumption is brought to a point by a statement of the Anglican theologian Richard Hooker: "There is not any man of the Church of England but the same man is also a member of the [English] commonwealth; nor any man a member of the commonwealth, which is not also of the Church of England." ["The Works of Richard Hooker", II, p. 485; quoted after: John Coffey (2000), p. 33 ]
Before a vigorous debate about religious persecution took place in England (starting in the 1640s), for centuries in Europe, religion had been tied to territory. In England there had been several Acts of Uniformity; in continental Europe the Latin phrase "
cuius regio, eius religio" had been used. Persecution meant that the state was committed to secure religious uniformity by coercive measures, as eminently obvious in a statement of Roger L'Estrange: "That which you call persecution, I translate Uniformity". [quoted after Coffey (2000), 27]
However, in the 17th century writers like
John Locke, Richard Overtonand Roger William broke the link between territory and faith, which eventually resulted in a shift from territoriality to religious voluntarism.Coffey 2000: 58.] It was Locke, who, in his Letter Concerning Toleration defined the state in purely secular terms:Coffey 2000: 57.] "The commonwealth seems to me to be a society of men constituted only for the procuring, preserving, and advancing their own civil interests."John Locke (1698): A Letter Concerning Toleration; [http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/locke/locke2/locke-t/locke_toleration.html Online edition] ] Concerning the church, he went on: "A church, then, I take to be a voluntary society of men, joining themselves together of their own accord.".]
Civil tolerance and ecclesiastical tolerance
This is not only the core of the concept of the
Separation of Church and State, and thus the intellectual basis of the Secular state, this is also relevant for Christian debate on persecution and toleration. Whereas "civil tolerance" allows each group of believers to form their own congregation, the degree of diversity tolerated within a particular church falls under the concept of "ecclesiastical tolerance". [John Coffey (2000), p. 12 ] The New Testament is rather strict regarding dissent within the Church. Not having the notion of separation of church and state at their disposal (or not accepting it), Christian theologians like Joseph Hall could reason from the ecclesiastical intolerance of the early Christian church in the New Testamentto the civil intolerance of the Christian state. [John Coffey (2000), p. 33 ]
Persecution for heresy and blasphemy
The persecution of beliefs that are deemed schismatic is one thing; the persecution of beliefs that are deemed heretic or blasphemous is another. Although a public disagreement on secondary matters might be serious enough, it has often only led to
religious discrimination. A public renouncement of core elements of a religious doctrine under the same circumstances, on the other hand, would have put one far greater danger. While a Dissenterfrom its official Church was only faced with fines and imprisonment in Protestant England, six people were executed for heresy or blasphemy during the reign of Elizabeth I of England, and two more in 1612 under James I of England. [ John Coffey (2000), p. 26 ]
Christian heresy, Heresy in Orthodox Judaism
Persecution for political reasons
More than 300 Roman Catholics were put to death by English governments between 1535 and 1681 for treason, thus for secular than religious offences. [ John Coffey (2000), p. 26 ] In 1570,
Pope Pius Vhad issued the bull Regnans in Excelsis, which absolved Catholics from their obligations to the government. [Coffey 2000: 85.] This dramatically worsened the situation of the Catholics in England. English governments continued to fear Popish Plot. An English act of government from the year 1585 declared that the purpose of Jesuitmissionaries who had come to Britain was " to stir up and move sedition, rebellion and open hostility". [Coffey 2000: 86.] Consequently Jesuit priests like Saint John Ogilviewere hanged. This somehow contrasts with the image of the Elizabethan eraas the time of William Shakespeare, but compared to the antecedent Marian Persecutionsthere is an important difference to consider. Mary I of Englandhad been motived by a religious zeal to purge heresy from her land, and during her short reign from 1553 to 1558 about 290 Protestants [Coffey 2000: 81.] had been burned at the stake for heresy, whereas Elizabeth I of England"acted out of fear for the security of her realm." [Coffey 2000: 92.]
Although his book was written before the September 11 attacks, John Coffey explicitly compares the English fear of a
Popish Plotwith the contemporary Islamophobiain the Western world. ["Like the extremist Islamic clerics who today provide inspiration for terrorist campaigns, the [Catholic] priests could not be treated like men who only sought the spiritual nourishment of the flock." Coffey 2000: 38&39.] Among the Muslims imprisoned in the Guantanamo Bay detention campthere also were Mehdi Ghezaliand Murat Kurnazwho could not have been found to have any connections with terrorism, but had travelled to Afghanistanand Pakistanbecause of their religious interests.
Egypt, according to Jewish tradition, came monotheistic Judaism, under Moses, one of its prophets. Among the Ten Commandmentsof that religion was one that forbade the worship of any other god than Yahweh. When Imperial Romeextended its reach to their area, various conflicts arose. Out of Judaismcame Christianity, which because it was monotheistic and also encouraged conversion was a much more powerful threat to the established pantheistic order than had been Judaism. The Jewish exemption from the requirement to participate in public cults was lifted and the anti-monotheistic religious persecution of the Christians began under Nero. By the eighth century Christianity had attained a clear ascendancy in Europe and neighboring regions and a period of consolidation began marked by the pursuit of heretics and various other forms of monotheistic religious persecution. Christian monotheistic religious persecution perhaps reached its apex with the Inquisition.
Meanwhile south and east of the Christian empires yet another monotheist religion had arisen:
Islam. Generally following the Jewish tradition of tolerance towards non-believers provided they maintained the outward habits of believers, Muslims spread across northern Africa, the Middle East, northern India, and adjoining regions.
Historical persecution by Christians, Persecution of Ancient Greek religion, Persecution of Christians."
Since the 18th century there have been many occasions where religious persecution has occurred.
Bahá'ís in Iran
The Bahá'ís are a religious community deemed as heretic in Islam. An important element in Islam is the belief that Muhammad is the
Seal of the prophets, and that there will be no other prophets after him. "This attitude serves to explain the extreme Muslim animosity toward Bahais," [www.bps.org: [http://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/faithpeople.html People of the book] ] followers of Bahá'u'lláh(1844 - 1921), who Bahais believe to be the most recent messenger from God.
Bahá'ís and various third party entities such as the
United Nations, Amnesty International, the European Union, the United Statesand peer-reviewed academic literature have stated that the members of the Bahá'í community in Iran, the nation of origin of the Bahá'í Faith, Iran's largest religious minority and the location of one of the largest Bahá'í populations in the world, have been subjected to unwarranted arrests, false imprisonment, beatings, torture, unjustified executions, confiscation and destruction of property owned by individuals and the Bahá'í community, denial of employment, denial of government benefits, denial of civil rights and liberties, and denial of access to higher education.
More recently, in the later months of 2005, an intensive anti-Bahá'í campaign was conducted by Iranian newspapers and radio stations. The state-run and influential
Kayhannewspaper, whose managing editoris appointed by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4308203.stm] , ran nearly three dozen articles defaming the Bahá'í Faith. The articles, which make use of fake historical documents, engage in a distortion of history to falsely describe Bahá'í moral principles in a manner that would be offensive to Muslims, thus inducing feelings of suspicion, distrust and hatred to members of the Bahá'í community in Iran. [http://www.bahai.org/iranthreat/mediaattack] .
Furthermore, a confidential letter sent on
October 29 2005by the Chairman of the Command Headquarters of the Armed Forced in Iran states that the Supereme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei has instructed the Command Headquarters to identify people who adhere to the Bahá'í Faith and to monitor their activiters and gather any and all information about the members of the Bahá'í Faith. The letter was brought to the attention of the international community by Asma Jahangir, the Special Rapporteur of the United Nations Commission on Human Rightson freedom of religion or belief, in a March 20, 2006press release [http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/5E72D6B7B624AABBC125713700572D09?opendocument] .
In the press release the Special Rapporteur states that she "is highly concerned by information she has received concerning the treatment of members of the Bahá'í community in Iran." She further states that "The Special Rapporteur is concerned that this latest development indicates that the situation with regard to religious minorities in Iran is, in fact, deteriorating." [http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/5E72D6B7B624AABBC125713700572D09?opendocument] .
Bahá'ís are also being persecuted in Egypt. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_identification_card_controversy]
People's Republic of China
The government of
People's Republic of Chinain mainland Chinahas banned the spiritual group Falun Gongand has conducted a massive crackdown on the groupFact|date=September 2008, including using torture and "re-education" camps to force its adherents to abandon Falun GongFact|date=September 2008. There are reports indicating that the PRC has engaged in organ harvesting from live Falun Gong adherents, among other human rightsabuses. The people whom practice this religion are harassed and tormented when found by the government for practicing the religion.Fact|date=September 2008POV-statement|date=September 2008
The trend toward
state atheismin Albaniawas taken to an extreme during the totalitarianregime, when religions, identified as imports foreign to Albanian culture, were banned altogether. This policy was mainly applied and felt within the borders of the present Albanian state, thus producing a nonreligiousmajority in the population. As the literary monthly "Nëndori" reported, the youth had thus "created the first Atheist nationin the world." From 1967 until the end of the totalitarian regime, religious practices were banned and the country was proclaimed officially Atheist, marking an event that happened for the first time in world history. Albanians born during the regime were never taught religion, so they grew up to become either Atheists or Agnostics. Although, now with Albania allowing the rights of individuals to practice religion, many Albanians have rekindled their beliefs in public and have admitted to practising religious ceremonies in secret during that time. Albanians that have fled from Albania during that time continued with their faith and have influenced a revival of religion back in Albania.
*John Coffey (2000), "Persecution and Toleration in Protestant England 1558-1689", Studies in modern History, Pearson Education
Human rights abuses
Opposition to cults and new religious movements
Religion and violence
* [http://www.ohchr.org/english/issues/religion/index.htm United Nations] - Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on freedom of religion or belief
* [http://www.uscirf.gov/ United States Commission on International Religious Freedom]
* http://atheism.about.com/od/religiousintolerance/ About.com section on Religious Intolerance
* http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/72238.pdf U.S. State Department 2006 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom
* http://www.persecution.in - Complete update about Christian persecution in India
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.