- Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006
Infobox UK Legislation
short_title= Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006
parliament=United Kingdom Parliament
long_title=An Act to make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds.
statute_book_chapter=2006 c. 1
introduced_by=
territorial_extent=England and Wales
royal_assent=16 February 2006
commencement=1 October 2007 (partially) [ [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/uksi_20072490_en_1 Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (Commencement No. 1) Order 2007] ]
amendments=None
related_legislation= 1984 c. 60, 1986 c. 64
status= In force|The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 is an Act of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom (citation 2006 c. 1) which creates an offence of inciting (or 'stirring up') hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion. The Act was the Labour Government's third attempt to bring in this offence: provisions were originally included as part of theAnti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill in 2001, but were dropped after objections from theHouse of Lords . The measure was again brought forward as part of theSerious Organised Crime and Police Bill in 2004-5, but was again dropped in order to get the body of that Bill passed before the 2005 general election.The Act is notable because two amendments made in the House of Lords failed to be overturned by the Government in the House of Commons.
Most of the act came into force on 1 October 2007.
Previous attempts at legislation
After the terrorist attacks of
11 September 2001 , the Government in Britain brought forward the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill. Clause 38 of that Bill would have had the effect of amending Part 3 of thePublic Order Act 1986 to extend the existing provisions on incitement to racial hatred to cover incitement to religious hatred. When the Bill reached the House of Lords, an amendment to remove the clause was passed by 240 votes to 141. The Commons reinstated the clause, but the Lords again removed it. Finally, the thenHome Secretary ,David Blunkett , accepted that the Commons had to accede to the Lords' insistence that the clause be left out of the Bill.On
8 January 2002 , aPrivate Member's Bill was brought before the House of Lords by Lord Avebury, who sought in his Religious Offences Bill to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to include religious hatred offences, in exactly the same manner as the Government's 2001 Bill. Although the reaction to the Bill itself was not favourable, the House did appoint a Select Committee to look into the whole law relating to religious offences, including the possibility of repealing the law relating toblasphemy . There were no specific recommendations from the Committee, and in a debate on its conclusions on22 April 2004 , the Government confirmed that it intended to press ahead with the creation of an incitement to religious hatred offence.The Government brought the proposal back before Parliament in the Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill in the Session leading up to the general election in May 2005. During the Lords debate on the relevant section of the Bill, on
5 April 2005 (the day on which the general election was called), the provision was removed. When the Bill returned to the Commons on7 April , the Government announced that it was dropping the measure so as to secure the passage of the Bill as a whole before the Dissolution of Parliament.At the general election, the Labour Party confirmed that, were it to be re-elected, it would bring in a Bill to outlaw incitement to religious hatred: "It remains our firm intention to give people of all faiths the same protection against incitement to hatred on the basis of their religion. We will legislate to outlaw it and will continue the dialogue we have started with faith groups from all backgrounds about how best to balance protection, tolerance and free speech" (Labour Party manifesto, 'Forward not back' (2005), p111-112).
Controversy
The bill contains wording to amend the Public Order Act 1986:
*Section 29A
**Meaning of "religious hatred"
***In this Part "religious hatred" means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.*Section 29B:
**(1) A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.Critics of the Bill (before the amendments noted below, adding the requirement for the intention of stirring up hatred) claimed that the Act would make major religious works such as the
Bible and theQur'an illegal in their current form in the UK. Comedians andsatirist s also feared prosecution for their work. While sympathising with those who promoted the legislation, in particular British Muslims, actor and comedianRowan Atkinson said: "I appreciate that this measure is an attempt to provide comfort and protection to them but unfortunately it is a wholly inappropriate response far more likely to promote tension between communities than tolerance."Cite web|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article23559.ece|title= Atkinson takes fight with religious hatred Bill to Parliament|accessdate=2007-08-30|publisher=The Independent |year=2007|author=Danielle Demetriou|format=HTML] Leaders of major religions and race groups, as well as non-religious groups such as theNational Secular Society and English PEN spoke out against the Bill.Supporters of the Bill responded that all UK legislation has to be interpreted in the light of the
Human Rights Act , which guarantees freedom of religion and expression, and so denied that an Act of Parliament is capable making any religious text illegal.The
House of Lords passed [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds05/text/51025-21.htm#st_188 amendments] to the Bill on25 October 2005 which have the effect of limiting the legislation to "A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening... if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred". This removed the abusive and insulting concept, and required the intention - and not just the possibility - of stirring up religious hatred.The Government attempted to overturn these changes, but lost the House of Commons votes on
31st January 2006 .History
*
11 July 2005 - the bill was passed by the House of Commons and was passed up to theHouse of Lords .
*11 October 2005 - The bill was read by the House of Lords as a 300-strong group of protestors demonstrated in Hyde Park. Forty-seven Lords spoke in the debate, of whom nine came out in support of the bill. [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds05/text/51011-31.htm]
*31 January 2006 - The Commons supported an amendment from the House of Lords by 288 to 278, contrary to the position of the Government. A second Lords amendment was approved by 283 votes to 282 in the absence of Prime MinisterTony Blair , who had apparently underestimated support for the amendment. This made the bill the Labour government's second defeat since the 2005 election. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4664398.stm]
*16 February 2006 - The Bill receivedRoyal Assent to become the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 c. 1.
*1 October 2007 - The act came partially into force with the publication of aStatutory Instrument . Remaining provisions awaiting commencement are the insertion of sections 29B(3), 29H(2), 29I(2)(b) and 29I(4) into the Public Order Act 1986:See also
*
Censorship in the United Kingdom
*Freedom of speech
*Incitement Notes
Voting
A complete summary of the voting in the various divisions of this bill may be found at [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/search.php?query=racial+and+religious+hatred+bill&button=Go www.publicwhip.org.uk] .
External links
*UK-SLD|2320532
* [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/20060001.htm Text of the Act]
* [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmrac.htm Hansard - Text of House of Commons Standing Committee discussion of the Bill]
* [http://www.barnabasfund.org/News/ITRHC/Amended_Public_Order_Act.htm Public Order Act, amended to reflect the proposed changes of the bill]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/4652669.stm Racial and Religious Hatred Bill] (BBC News Bill Tracker)
* [http://www.politics.co.uk/issueoftheday/todays-issue-racial-and-religious-hatred-bill-$8707000.htm politics.co.uk news roundup]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3873323.stm Q&A: Religious hatred law] (BBC News,9 June 2005 )
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4075442.stm New effort to ban religious hate] (BBC News,11 June 2005 )
* [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1817438,00.html Blackadder's revenge hits the hate bill] ("The Sunday Times",9 October 2005
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4329716.stm Protest over religious hate] (BBC News,11 October 2005 )
* [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,11026,1590048,00.html Christian group may seek ban on Qur'an] ("The Guardian ",12 October 2005 )
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.