- Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board
-
Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board Court Court of Session, Inner House Keywords Employment contract, smoking Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board [1992] IRLR 469 is a UK labour law case concerning the contract of employment. It held that a variation of company workplace customs, which are incorporated into individual contracts of employment can take place after a proper consultation without breaching employees' contracts.
Contents
Facts
Ms Dryden was a nursing auxiliary in a Glasgow hospital. She smoked. After consultations, which she did not contribute to, smoking was banned. She claimed constructive dismissal on the basis that the workplace custom being unilaterally changed breached her employment contract.
Judgment
Lord Coulsfield held that a unilateral variation on the workplace rules did not amount to a breach of any contract term. The consultation process was influential in making the rule change legitimate.
See also
Employment contract cases Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41Devonald v Rosser & Sons [1906] 2 KB 728Sagar v Ridehalgh & Sons Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 310Wiluszynski v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [1989] ICR 439Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No 2) [1972] ICR 19Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board [1992] IRLR 469French v Barclays Bank plc [1998] EWCA Civ 1092Alexander v Standard Telephones Ltd (No 2) [1991] IRLR 287Kaur v MG Rover Group Ltd [2004] EWCA 1507Wilsons and Clyde Coal Ltd v English [1938] AC 57Wilson v Racher [1974] ICR 428Mahmud and Malik v BCCI SA [1997] UKHL 23Transco plc v O’Brien [2002] EWCA Civ 379Rigby v Ferodo Ltd [1988] ICR 29Cresswell v Board of Inland Revenue [1984] ICR 508Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1991] 2 All ER 293Henry v London Greater Transport Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 488Robertson v British Gas Corp [1983] ICR 351see Employment contract in English law - UK labour law
- Employment contract in English law
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41
Notes
References
External links
Categories:- United Kingdom labour case law
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.