- Davis v. Mann
-
Davis v. Mann
Supreme Court of the United StatesArgued November 14, 18, 1963
Decided June 15, 1964Full case name Levin Nock Davis, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, et al. v. Harrison Mann, et al. Citations 377 U.S. 678 (more)
84 S.Ct. 1441, 12 L.Ed.2d 609Prior history Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Subsequent history affirmed and remanded for remedy Holding The Court struck down Virginia's state legislative district inequality, basing their decision on the principle of "one person, one vote." Court membership Chief Justice
Earl WarrenAssociate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan, Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Arthur GoldbergCase opinions Majority Warren, joined by Black, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, White, Goldberg Concurrence Stewart Dissent Harlan Laws applied U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Equal Protection Clause Davis v. Mann, 377 U.S. 678 (1964) was a United States Supreme Court which was one of a series of cases decided in 1964 that ruled that state legislature districts had to be roughly equal in population. It was issued along with Reynolds v. Sims and cites that case the opinion.
Contents
Facts
Voters from Arlington County and Fairfax County, Virginia challenged the apportionment of the Virginia General Assembly. Voters from Norfolk, Virginia were permitted to intervene as plaintiffs and on appeal, the United States intervened as amicus curiae to support the appellees.
Under the 1962 redistricting statute, in order to keep counties and cities wholly in a district, there were wide disparities in the population of Senate and House of Delegates districts. Arlington County, for example, was apportioned one senator for its 163,401 persons, only .61 of the representation to which it would be entitled on a strict population basis, while the smallest senatorial district, with respect to population, had only 61,730, and the next smallest 63,703. The District Court found "that the maximum population-variance ratio between the most populous and least populous senatorial districts is 2.65-to-1. Under the 1962 senatorial apportionment, applying 1960 population figures, approximately 41.1% of the State's total population reside in districts electing a majority of the members of that body." Davis at 687-688.
The Court's opinion
Having already overturned its ruling that redistricting was a purely political question in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), the Court went further in order to correct what seemed to it to be egregious examples of malapportionment which were serious enough to undermine the premises underlying republican government. Before Reynolds, urban counties and cities, like those in which the plaintiffs resided, were often drastically underrepresented in state legislatures. This was presented as one of the defenses of the Commonwealth, but the Court rejected this defense, saying "Not only does this explanation lack legal merit, but it also fails to conform to the facts. Some Virginia urban areas, such as Richmond, by comparison with Arlington, Fairfax and Norfolk, appear to be quite adequately represented in the General Assembly." Davis at 692.
The Virginia case also presented a different argument regarding the presence of large numbers of military personnel in the affected city and counties. However, the court reject appellants' argument dismissing it as a post-hoc explanation, saying there was no evidence that the legislature considered military personnel in drawing the 1962 districts.
Justice Potter Stewart issued a concurrence, in which he argued that wide disparities in population could be constitutional if the Commonwealth could articulate non-discriminatory reasons, but held that the Commonwealth could advance "no rational basis for the disfavoring of Arlington, Fairfax and Norfolk." Davis at 695.
Justice John Marshall Harlan II reiterated and adopted his dissent in Reynolds v. Sims.
Aftermath
The Commonwealth of Virginia redrew its legislative districts so that they were equipopulous, based on the 1960 decennial census data, in time for the 1967 elections.
See also
- One person, one vote
- Rotten borough, an English phenomenon
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 377
External links
Works related to Davis v. Mann at Wikisource
Categories:- Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles
- United States equal protection case law
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States electoral redistricting case law
- 1964 in United States case law
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.