Davis v. Bandemer

Davis v. Bandemer
Davis v. Bandemer
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 7, 1985
Decided June 30, 1986
Full case name Davis, et al. v. Bandemer, et al.
Citations 478 U.S. 109 (more)
106 S. Ct. 2797; 92 L. Ed. 2d 85; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 122; 54 U.S.L.W. 4898
Prior history Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Holding
Claims of partisan gerrymandering was within the judiciary's remit, but failed to agree on a clear standard for judicial review of those claims. The decision was later limited with respect to many of the elements directly involving issues of redistricting and political gerrymandering, but was somewhat broadened with respect to less significant ancillary procedural issues.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority White (part II), joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens
Concurrence White (parts I, III, IV), joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun
Concurrence Burger, joined by Burger, Rehnquist
Concurrence O'Connor
Concur/dissent Powell, joined by Stevens

Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering was within the judiciary's remit, but failed to agree on a clear standard for the judicial review of the class of claims of a political nature to which such cases belong. The decision was later limited with respect to many of the elements directly involving issues of redistricting and political gerrymandering, but was somewhat broadened with respect to less significant ancillary procedural issues.

See also


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Vieth v. Jubelirer — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Vieth v. Jubelirer ArgueDate=December 10 ArgueYear=2003 DecideDate=April 28 DecideYear=2004 FullName=Richard Vieth, et al. v. Robert C. Jubelirer, President of the Pennsylvania Senate, et al. USVol=541 USPage=267 Citation=541 …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 478 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 478 of the United States Reports :* Press Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside , ussc|478|1|1986 * Thornburg v. Gingles , ussc|478|30|1986 * Davis v …   Wikipedia

  • proportional representation — A method of election which gives representation to minority interests. In connection with elections for political office, the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require proportional representation. Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S.… …   Black's law dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”